Excellent except for one thing... okay, maybe two

This book is great, the reader is great, it's super informative and interesting but there is one irritating thing that is making me really wish I had bought this as a real, live book instead.
You see, this book is abridged. I didn't realize that when I bought it... my bad.
It's very poorly done. I'm only two (?) hours through it and I've noticed two or three obvious breaks. One where she was going to talk about Ancel Keys' and his influence on the saturated fat debate and it completely cut to something else. That is, unfortunately, something that I really wanted to hear about.
Actually, there is one other issue with this audio book that I did not realize until the intro was read; apparently the text version has a very extensive and meticulous reference section.
In all, if you don't have time to actually read this book, then get this. Otherwise, you should buy the text version.

On the other hand, maybe if an unabridged version comes out, Audible will refund our money for this version and we can buy the complete one (*wink-wink, nudge-nudge*).

28 people found this helpful

Mostly very good, diet advice dated

The book does an excellent job of exposing the corrupting power of big money both on nutrition research and the ability of authorities to give intelligent nutrition advice. Even the abridged version was at times long-winded.

The book was more about process than about what makes good nutritional sense. It took the FDA's food pyramid as gospel, though many now think its heavy focus on grains leads to increased inflammation and excessive carb consumption with associated adverse health consequences. There is also little talk of the value of omega 3's. On the other hand, the book speaks of the danger of higher dose vitamin D without noting its potential benefits or the ability to maintain safety through blood testing.

The book a little naively seems to think that if the FDA would just be left in peace, it could be relied on to give optimal nutrition advice. In fact, the area is complex, many topics lack consensus, and gross error have been made. Remember margarine? Why anyone ever thought consuming a synthetic fat made sense is beyond me. Further, given the difficulty in getting funding for supplement research and how long it takes the research to come to definitive conclusions, one can reasonably decide to take supplements before all of the research is in. On the other hand, the book correctly notes that it hardly makes sense for supplement manufacturers to be able to come out with products without safety testing.

5 people found this helpful

Keys is still influencing nutritionist

It is a shame that after 30 years as a major influence to the SAD, Ms Nestle only understands the term nutrition as it pertains to the 1970's. When she speaks about lobbyists, she talks softly and carries no weight.

1 person found this helpful

Lots of Facts, lacks narrative.

What did you like best about Food Politics? What did you like least?

This is book is written with lots of facts and an unbiased view. However, this is very difficult to listen to because it lacks a narrative. The theme of the book is carried without but, it is very easy to put down. Perhaps I would have been more excited if the information presented was "new" information to me.

Did Kate Reading do a good job differentiating all the characters? How?

Any additional comments?

I would recommend any of Michael Pollan's books over this one. His books drive action around eating and food choices. This book is more of a reference for a white paper or essay.

1 person found this helpful

Disappointing reading of an important work

Despite my interest in this title and respect for Marion Nestle's work, I am returning this version because I dislike the arrogant, sarcastic, condescending tone of the reader. I tried, but simply couldn't bear to listen to her.

Well researched

I enjoyed Marion Nestle’s other book (What to Eat), and was equally impressed with this book. It was well researched and so interesting! So much is linked to how the food companies manipulate the public by advertising to kids.

Powerful data.

From someone who came from the industry Incredible insights and solutions. Buy this book. Practical

Felt like a boring academic lecture

I was really excited to read this book and learn more. The writer is a professor, and the writing is very academic and very boring. I almost couldn’t stand to listen to it the whole time.

Enjoyable listen

Would you listen to Food Politics again? Why?

Yes. There's a ton of good, insightful information in there. I listened to it in on 1.5 to 2x about a month or more ago, so I could definitely benefit from another listen through in a few months or so if not sooner.

Any additional comments?

This audiobook really opened up my eyes to the many different motives behind all the food information and mis-information out there. I really appreciated the added perspective and am so glad I got to listen to it.

Interesting subject but hard to listen/read

Was just too boring. Rambled on and on about same subject. After the initial chapters, felt I was repeating the same chapter over and over.