Introduction with depth and without bias

I was cautious at first, given that a shallow, slanted view trends to sell better than a more nuanced look; especially given the current political climate.

I was quickly, pleasantly surprised by the quality of these lectures. Mr. Esposito provides a wonderful introduction to Islam, customs, and mainstream thought while giving historical and comparative analysis. Mr. Esposito also addresses extremism, it's relation/separation to the mainstream and gives context for verses (taken out of context) commonly used to justify extremism. Mr. Esposito them goes even further to explain how extremists are actually in violation of Islam.

Throughout, Mr. Esposito gives references and points to exact instances to support the material. Thus, he avoids the all too common trap of, "trust me, I have a title. "

I would highly recommend this to anyone interested in learning more about Islam, whether they were new to the topic or well versed. Mr. Esposito uses an academic approach, so if you are expecting proscletizing you will be disappointed. But, if you have a genuine curiosity, you will not be disappointed.

23 people found this helpful

Disappointing

This course is actually a series of essays read aloud by the professor, with no attempt to make them into lectures. As a result, the monotonous pacing and complex sentence structure make it almost impossible to listen attentively. This is the first Great Course I've e we found to be so poorly done.

21 people found this helpful

Muslim review of the course

If you could sum up Great World Religions: Islam in three words, what would they be?

Accurate, fair, best

Would you be willing to try another book from The Great Courses and John L. Esposito ? Why or why not?

Yes because its the best out there.

Any additional comments?

I found the first 2 videos to be fair and truthful. John Esposito does an excellent job of explaining the religion, the diversity of the religion and the 5 pillars. He brings in the concept of Jihad masterfully at the end of the second video.

The only complaints which were really small mistakes were around the 38 second mark in the first video in which he stated that some Muslim nations ban women from driving along with other issues. The reality is only Saudi Arabia bans women from driving which Professor Esposito is cited stating on politifact. At the 11:31 mark he states that Zakat is paid in Ramadan. Zakat is actually paid 1 year from when one meets the nisab (minimum requirement of savings to be required to pay zakat). Around 22:40 mar of the first lecture Esposito states that Islam had mainly male scholars and was patriarchal. Fine but Women Muslim Scholars vastly outnumbered Christian/Jewish women scholars which were much more patriarchal. Its very important to contextualize. We cannot compare modern day Islam to modern day Christianity/Judaism. Many modern Muslim nations are less than 60 years old and Islam is 600 years younger than Christianity. However the first 1200 years of Islam, Islam was well ahead in women rights only to be surpassed in 1970 with voting, credit card and inheritance rights. In some ways Islam still stands on the moral high ground with a marriage gift, requirements of men to provide for women, requirement of men to attend religious services but not women and more. Always contextualize!!

I gave this 4 stars because it is in my opinion one of the best videos on Islam out there today that I know of. Common Ground Institute & Services is planning to release similar videos by Muslim scholars for the public. I would recommend the following scholars on You Tube for further knowledge on Islam:
-Hamza Yusuf
-Yasir Qadhi
-Omer Suleiman
-Tariq Ramadan
-Abdul Hakim Murad

Thank you
Sami Aziz
Muslim Chaplain for Wesleyan University
Hartford Seminary Masters in Muslim-Christian Relations

31 people found this helpful

Good Info, Less than I Wanted, AWFUL LECTURER

The information was good and respectful, and was presented well. I did learn stuff about Islam.

I'd been hoping for a LOT more detail, but that's largely my own fault for failing to notice that it was only a 6h course, as opposed to the 21h course I'd last purchased. Lesson learned!

But he was SO HARD to listen to! So many long random pauses! I listened to most of the course on 1.5x, and all was much improved, but there was still the occasional odd too-long pause. Even at 2x his speech patterns were distracting!

If I were to do this again, I'd look for the same lecturer's book on Audible, which looks to contain much of the same content, but is narrated by someone else.

18 people found this helpful

A few hours of why 'No true Muslim' is a terrorist

I wanted a history or theology 'course', not 9 hours of poorly justified harangues about the nature of 'true' Islam, where minorities doing really bad stuff are called extremists, and minorities doing good (by Western standards) are held up as examples of how good Islam is as a religion.

The entire series of lectures is rife with similar logic issues, from the early claim that Islam is an Abrahamic religion because it co-opted some of the tenets and history (rather than grew out of an existing Judaic tradition) to the later claim that almost all conceptions of negative aspects of Islam aren't really part of Islam because there's a group of practitioners who doesn't follow that aspect.

I didn't go in looking for an Islam bashing session, or reasons to hate Islam, but I was hoping for a more honest approach. This definitely wasn't one. It is 100% from the perspective that Islam is a wonderful religion, and any problems it has integrating with the modern world are due to the world, or minor subgroups barely worthy of any discussion or consideration except to talk about how they are polluting the 'true' meaning of Islam.

Admittedly this is a very short overview course, and there's not enough time to cover everything. The lecture on the 5 pillars was interesting, but wasn't tied to much historical context.

The discussion of the hijab was a particularly good discussion, although in the end felt a little unconvincing. Certainly there are freer societies where women choose to wear a headscarf as a means of expressing religious identity and opting out of an appearance driven culture. Tying that 1 to 1 in with the treatment of women in conservative dominated societies is a false comparison that does more harm that good to the Islamic cause.

At the end of the day, anything as nebulous and porous as religion needs to be considered from the point of view of the preponderance of its practitioners, and trying to define the 'true' version of a religion is rather meaningless, especially when going on about it comes at the expense of time that could be spent discussion the actual history or theologies of various sub groups.

7 people found this helpful

A VERY brief introduction to the subject

A fan of the Great Courses, I usually enjoy the wealth of information I can get from a single title. This title, however, was way too short. There was only one chapter (30 min) for example, about Muhammad and I cannot tell anything about the Koran from this lecture- it's structure, message, the famous comexities and paradoxes and the like.

13 people found this helpful

As a Muslim, this is fairly accurate

As a Muslim, I wanted to understand how Islam is being presented to non-Muslims in an academic way. This is fairly accurate on the fundamentals, but there were several points I would have wanted to correct the professor at, especially in the second half of the course.

36 people found this helpful

Good Material... But...

The class is interesting, and it touches various topics of interest such as the role of women within Islam, or the future of the Islam. BUT, I was hoping for a deeper explanation of the doctrine itself.

5 people found this helpful

Beginning to Understand

Would you consider the audio edition of Great World Religions: Islam to be better than the print version?

Not applicable.

Who was your favorite character and why?

No characters. It's a lecture series.

Have you listened to any of Professor John L. Esposito’s other performances before? How does this one compare?

I haven't but he was engaging.

If you were to make a film of this book, what would the tag line be?

Not possible.

Any additional comments?

I have a Christian background and didn't understand this third member of the Abrahamic tradition. There is a lot of information and you will begin to understand not only the divergence from Judaism and Christianity but the split between Sunni and Shia. I recommend it with caution because you will know that you understand more but also that a mountain of information is still out there.

13 people found this helpful

Not what I was looking for

I was hoping to get a fairly unbiased explanation of what Islam was about and the history of the religion. But in this book what I got was an angry indictment against what the author assumes is every American's opinion about Muslims.

1 person found this helpful