Episodes

  • Wonder Man • Comics Primer & Episode 1
    Jan 29 2026
    Marvel’s latest Disney+ series Wonder Man features one of their most obscure characters—a struggling actor named Simon Williams who becomes Wonder Man. Matthew hosts Will and Steve from the Hype Is My Superpower podcast to explore episode one and dive into the comic book history of this B-list Avenger who’s spent more time on movie sets than saving the world.The conversation examines why the MCU chose this particular character for a show that’s more about Hollywood and acting than superheroism. From Wonder Man’s 1960s origins with Baron Zemo and ionic rays to his modern role as an Avenger who’d rather be anywhere else, the discussion reveals how this character’s comic book history makes him surprisingly perfect for a meta-commentary on genre entertainment.Questions We Discussed
    • Has the MCU reached a point where it’s making satires about making MCU shows?
    • How does Wonder Man compare to other Marvel characters who maintain civilian careers like She-Hulk’s legal work?
    • Why did Simon Williams leave the superhero world to pursue acting full-time in the comics?
    • Does having an obscure character give Marvel more creative freedom without fan backlash?

    **************************************************************************
    This episode is a production of Superhero Ethics, a The Ethical Panda Podcast and part of the TruStory FM Entertainment Podcast Network. Check our our website to find out more about this and our sister podcast Star Wars Generations.We want to hear from you! You can keep up with our latest news, and send us feedback, questions, or comments via social media or email.
    • Email: Matthew@TheEthicalPanda.com
    • Facebook: TheEthicalPanda
    • Instagram: TheEthicalPandaPodcasts
    • Twitter: EthicalPanda77
    • Or you can join jump into the Star Wars Generations and Superhero Ethics channels on the TruStory FM Discord.

    Want to get access to even more content while supporting the podcast? Become a member! For $5 a month, or $55 a year you get access to bonus episodes and bonus content at the end of most episodes. Sign up on the podcast’s main page. You can even give membership as a gift!
    You can also support our podcasts through our sponsors:
    • Purchase a lightsaber from Level Up Sabers run by friend of the podcast Neighborhood Master Alan
    • Use Audible for audiobooks. Sign up for a one year membership or gift one through this link.
    • Purchase any media discussed this week through our sponsored links.
    Show More Show Less
    48 mins
  • The Copenhagen Test & The Ethics of Espionage
    Jan 27 2026
    What do you do when following orders means sacrificing innocent lives? In this episode, we examine the new Peacock series The Copenhagen Test starring Simu Liu, exploring the ethical dilemmas facing modern intelligence operatives. Through a spy thriller that uses biometric surveillance technology as its MacGuffin, we unpack questions about collateral damage, revenge versus ideology, and whether spy agencies can ever justify their methods.Questions We DiscussedWhat is the Copenhagen test and why does the show use it as its title? We explore this impossible moral dilemma presented to special operations soldiers and intelligence agents, examining whether there are situations where no ethical choice exists.Does the show take a stance on whether US spy agencies are justified? We analyze how the series sidesteps ideological questions by making its villains motivated by money and personal revenge rather than competing political philosophies.How does the show handle collateral damage in intelligence operations? We examine powerful scenes showing the emotional aftermath of missions, particularly through the character Parker who witnesses the deadly consequences of her recommendations.Can spy fiction avoid taking political positions in today's climate? We discuss whether it's possible—or desirable—for a show to focus solely on questioning the means while deferring judgment about the ends.Is this show continuing or subverting recent trends in spy media? We trace how spy fiction has evolved from pro-agency to more skeptical portrayals, and where The Copenhagen Test fits in that trajectory.Additional TopicsThe effectiveness of Simu Liu as an action hero leading manHow the show's diverse casting enhances the storyThe show's use of near-future surveillance technology as a storytelling deviceWhether the "Russian nesting doll" villain structure sets up compelling future seasonsComparisons to The Bourne Identity, Burn Notice, and other spy thriller influences**************************************************************************This episode is a production of Superhero Ethics, a The Ethical Panda Podcast and part of the TruStory FM Entertainment Podcast Network. Check our our website to find out more about this and our sister podcast Star Wars Generations.We want to hear from you! You can keep up with our latest news, and send us feedback, questions, or comments via social media or email.Email: Matthew@TheEthicalPanda.comFacebook: TheEthicalPandaInstagram: TheEthicalPandaPodcastsTwitter: EthicalPanda77Or you can join jump into the Star Wars Generations and Superhero Ethics channels on the TruStory FM Discord.Want to get access to even more content while supporting the podcast? Become a member! For $5 a month, or $55 a year you get access to bonus episodes and bonus content at the end of most episodes. Sign up on the podcast’s main page. You can even give membership as a gift!You can also support our podcasts through our sponsors:Purchase a lightsaber from Level Up Sabers run by friend of the podcast Neighborhood Master AlanUse Audible for audiobooks. Sign up for a one year membership or gift one through this link.Purchase any media discussed this week through our sponsored links.
    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 10 mins
  • Frankenstein: Exploring Ethical Questions Across Mediums
    Jan 20 2026
    Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein continues to captivate audiences centuries after its publication, but not all adaptations emphasize the same ethical questions. Matthew and returning guest AK dive into both the original novel and Guillermo del Toro’s recent film adaptation—not to catalog their differences, but to explore how each medium handles the story’s core moral dilemmas and which approach proves more compelling.How Does the Film Emphasize “The Other” Differently?While both the book and film explore themes of parentage, responsibility, and scientific hubris, they emphasize different ethical questions. AK notes that the novel places stronger emphasis on the responsibilities of individuals in medicine and parenting, particularly through the lens of abandonment. The film, however, foregrounds questions about the grotesque other, the monstrous other, and how appearance shapes moral judgment. The visual decisions in del Toro’s adaptation—juxtaposing the creature against beautiful backdrops that shift with emotional moments—underscore this emphasis.How Does the Shift from Abandonment to Abuse Change Victor’s Responsibility?One of the most striking differences between the book and film lies in Victor Frankenstein’s initial interaction with his creation. In Shelley’s novel, Victor creates the monster, goes to bed, wakes up, and immediately flees—abandoning the creature with almost no interaction. Del Toro’s film takes a dramatically different approach: Victor spends considerable time with the creature, engaging with it in ways impossible in the book. This changes the fundamental ethical question. Does Victor bear responsibility for abandonment and neglect, or for intentional, directed abuse? The film’s choice to show an extended period of interaction—where Victor treats the creature as an object rather than a being—shifts the moral weight of his culpability.Why Does the Composite Body Matter More Now Than Ever?Victor’s method of selecting “optimal” body parts from different corpses to create his creature resonates uncomfortably with contemporary debates about human enhancement and biotechnology. The discussion explores how Victor’s approach—viewing the creature as an optimization project rather than a living being—connects to modern questions about CRISPR, genetic modification, and who decides what constitutes an “optimal” human body. These questions inevitably involve ableism and the commodification of bodies. The film’s emphasis on Victor literally selecting bodies at prisons raises urgent parallels to current concerns: Who becomes test subjects for experimental procedures like Neuralink? Are they being viewed as humans or as subjects for experimentation?Other Topics Covered:Why the novel’s nested narrative structure (stories within stories) creates a unique moral complexityHow both works explore humanity’s relationship to nature, science, and the line between achievement and hubrisThe challenge of adapting works from different historical contexts when what counted as scientific hubris has radically changedThe concept of viewing people as player characters (with their own interiority) versus non-player characters (existing only to advance your plot)Why Frankenstein’s relevance grows as biotechnology makes questions of life preservation more immediateThe conversation reveals how both Shelley’s novel and del Toro’s film use the Frankenstein story to explore timeless questions through different emphases—one focusing on neglect and parental failure, the other on abuse and the othering of those who don’t meet conventional standards of beauty or normalcy. **************************************************************************This episode is a production of Superhero Ethics, a The Ethical Panda Podcast and part of the TruStory FM Entertainment Podcast Network. Check our our website to find out more about this and our sister podcast Star Wars Generations.We want to hear from you! You can keep up with our latest news, and send us feedback, questions, or comments via social media or email.Email: Matthew@TheEthicalPanda.comFacebook: TheEthicalPandaInstagram: TheEthicalPandaPodcastsTwitter: EthicalPanda77Or you can join jump into the Star Wars Generations and Superhero Ethics channels on the TruStory FM Discord.Want to get access to even more content while supporting the podcast? Become a member! For $5 a month, or $55 a year you get access to bonus episodes and bonus content at the end of most episodes. Sign up on the podcast’s main page. You can even give membership as a gift!You can also support our podcasts through our sponsors:Purchase a lightsaber from Level Up Sabers run by friend of the podcast Neighborhood Master AlanUse Audible for audiobooks. Sign up for a one year membership or gift one through this link.Purchase any media discussed this week through our sponsored links.
    Show More Show Less
    45 mins
  • Marvel’s Drift, DC’s Reset: 2025 Review + 2026 Preview
    Jan 13 2026
    Jessica Plummer returns for a year-end superhero ethics check-in—recorded late 2025 and released as 2026 gets underway—to unpack what worked, what didn’t, and what Marvel and DC’s biggest swings revealed about power, responsibility, and heroism.We talk Marvel’s post-Endgame sprawl: scattered continuity, delayed payoffs, and what “superhero fatigue” looks like when it’s less about quantity and more about momentum. We also dig into standout projects like Thunderbolts and Fantastic Four, and why individual entries can succeed even when the larger arc feels unclear.Then we shift to DC’s early steps under James Gunn, including why Superman felt like a tonal reset, and what we’re watching as 2026 brings Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow, the upcoming Green Lantern series, and Marvel’s road to Doomsday.Resources
    • Jessica’s work: Book Riot • JessicaPlummerWrites.com
    • Sword Stone Table: Penguin Random House

    **************************************************************************
    This episode is a production of Superhero Ethics, a The Ethical Panda Podcast and part of the TruStory FM Entertainment Podcast Network. Check our our website to find out more about this and our sister podcast Star Wars Generations.We want to hear from you! You can keep up with our latest news, and send us feedback, questions, or comments via social media or email.
    • Email: Matthew@TheEthicalPanda.com
    • Facebook: TheEthicalPanda
    • Instagram: TheEthicalPandaPodcasts
    • Twitter: EthicalPanda77
    • Or you can join jump into the Star Wars Generations and Superhero Ethics channels on the TruStory FM Discord.

    Want to get access to even more content while supporting the podcast? Become a member! For $5 a month, or $55 a year you get access to bonus episodes and bonus content at the end of most episodes. Sign up on the podcast’s main page. You can even give membership as a gift!
    You can also support our podcasts through our sponsors:
    • Purchase a lightsaber from Level Up Sabers run by friend of the podcast Neighborhood Master Alan
    • Use Audible for audiobooks. Sign up for a one year membership or gift one through this link.
    • Purchase any media discussed this week through our sponsored links.
    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 4 mins
  • Theodicy & Thor: Love and Thunder
    Jan 6 2026
    Thor: Love and Thunder opens with one of philosophy's oldest questions: if gods exist and have the power to prevent suffering, why don't they? But does the film actually engage with this theodicy question, or does it abandon the premise for jokes and spectacle? We compare the movie's treatment of Gorr the God Butcher to the comics' more sustained exploration of divine accountability.Questions we explored:
    • What is theodicy, and why does it matter to Gorr's story?
    • How does the comic version of Gorr differ from the film's portrayal?
    • Does Thor: Love and Thunder set up the theodicy question well but then fail to follow through?
    • Is Thor innocent of Gorr’s accusations of other gods, since Thor doesn’t cultivate the worship of mortals?
    • Why does the film version of Gorr lack encounters with other cruel or indifferent gods?
    • How does comic Thor resolve the God Butcher arc by becoming a god who suffers alongside humanity?
    • Has Thor regressed to his character from the first movie, undoing his growth from previous films?
    • Is Thor: Love and Thunder's tonal inconsistency its biggest weakness?

    **************************************************************************
    This episode is a production of Superhero Ethics, a The Ethical Panda Podcast and part of the TruStory FM Entertainment Podcast Network. Check our our website to find out more about this and our sister podcast Star Wars Generations.We want to hear from you! You can keep up with our latest news, and send us feedback, questions, or comments via social media or email.
    • Email: Matthew@TheEthicalPanda.com
    • Facebook: TheEthicalPanda
    • Instagram: TheEthicalPandaPodcasts
    • Twitter: EthicalPanda77
    • Or you can join jump into the Star Wars Generations and Superhero Ethics channels on the TruStory FM Discord.

    Want to get access to even more content while supporting the podcast? Become a member! For $5 a month, or $55 a year you get access to bonus episodes and bonus content at the end of most episodes. Sign up on the podcast’s main page. You can even give membership as a gift!
    You can also support our podcasts through our sponsors:
    • Purchase a lightsaber from Level Up Sabers run by friend of the podcast Neighborhood Master Alan
    • Use Audible for audiobooks. Sign up for a one year membership or gift one through this link.
    • Purchase any media discussed this week through our sponsored links.
    Show More Show Less
    58 mins
  • Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery • Theology, Patriarchy, and the Church's Sins
    Dec 30 2025
    What happens when a murder mystery becomes a theological reckoning? In Wake Up Dead Man, Rian Johnson delivers a Knives Out film that confronts Christian nationalism, toxic masculinity in the church, and the possibility of authentic faith beyond institutional corruption. Rev. Rachel Kessler, aka The Nerdy Priest, joins Matthew to unpack Father Jud's journey from failed boxer to priest, the film's sharp critique of religious authority, and why Benoit Blanc's turning down Jud’s invitation to mass is essentially the message of the movie.Questions we discussed:
    • How does the character of the Monsignor embody Christian nationalism and toxic masculinity within church leadership?
    • What does Father Jud's struggle with his violent past reveal about redemption and the nature of calling?
    • How does the film parallel Rian Johnson's themes from The Last Jedi about institutional failure and who gets to own sacred stories?
    • How does the movie distinguish between authentic Christianity and the church as an instrument of patriarchal control?
    • What's the significance of Benoit Blanc experiencing a "road to Damascus moment" but still declining to stay for Mass?
    • Why does the film end with the church renamed "Our Lady of Perpetual Grace" while the pulpit—and its temptations—remains?

    **************************************************************************
    This episode is a production of Superhero Ethics, a The Ethical Panda Podcast and part of the TruStory FM Entertainment Podcast Network. Check our our website to find out more about this and our sister podcast Star Wars Generations.We want to hear from you! You can keep up with our latest news, and send us feedback, questions, or comments via social media or email.
    • Email: Matthew@TheEthicalPanda.com
    • Facebook: TheEthicalPanda
    • Instagram: TheEthicalPandaPodcasts
    • Twitter: EthicalPanda77
    • Or you can join jump into the Star Wars Generations and Superhero Ethics channels on the TruStory FM Discord.

    Want to get access to even more content while supporting the podcast? Become a member! For $5 a month, or $55 a year you get access to bonus episodes and bonus content at the end of most episodes. Sign up on the podcast’s main page. You can even give membership as a gift!
    You can also support our podcasts through our sponsors:
    • Purchase a lightsaber from Level Up Sabers run by friend of the podcast Neighborhood Master Alan
    • Use Audible for audiobooks. Sign up for a one year membership or gift one through this link.
    • Purchase any media discussed this week through our sponsored links.
    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 17 mins
  • Rob Reiner and the Rom-Com
    Dec 23 2025
    How did Rob Reiner redefine rom-coms and the role of romance in action adventure movies? In light of the recent tragic death of Michele and Rob Reiner, Mandy Kaplan joins Matthew to talk about his legacy and then examine two defining films from the director: When Harry Met Sally... (1989) and The Princess Bride (1987). One asks whether men and women can be friends; the other explores what “true love” actually means. Together, they reveal Reiner’s unique approach to romantic storytelling and the moral questions embedded in how we connect with others.We explore how When Harry Met Sally... uses Sally’s rigid control and Harry’s defensive cynicism to examine self-deception and emotional availability, while The Princess Bride employs fairy tale structure to investigate devotion, sacrifice, and the nature of romantic commitment. Both films challenge conventional rom-com formulas to ask deeper questions about authenticity, vulnerability, and what we owe each other.Questions We Discussed
    • Can men and women actually be friends without sex complicating things, and how does When Harry Met Sally... answer this question?
    • How does The Princess Bride define “true love” differently than typical romantic stories?
    • How does Westley and Buttercup’s relationship in The Princess Bride model devotion and sacrifice?
    • What makes Rob Reiner’s approach to romantic comedy distinct from other directors in the genre?
    • How do both films explore the relationship between friendship and romantic love?
    • Does The Princess Bride’s fairy tale framework allow it to examine love more honestly than realistic rom-coms?
    • What role does vulnerability play in the ethical transformation of characters in both films?

    **************************************************************************
    This episode is a production of Superhero Ethics, a The Ethical Panda Podcast and part of the TruStory FM Entertainment Podcast Network. Check our our website to find out more about this and our sister podcast Star Wars Generations.We want to hear from you! You can keep up with our latest news, and send us feedback, questions, or comments via social media or email.
    • Email: Matthew@TheEthicalPanda.com
    • Facebook: TheEthicalPanda
    • Instagram: TheEthicalPandaPodcasts
    • Twitter: EthicalPanda77
    • Or you can join jump into the Star Wars Generations and Superhero Ethics channels on the TruStory FM Discord.

    Want to get access to even more content while supporting the podcast? Become a member! For $5 a month, or $55 a year you get access to bonus episodes and bonus content at the end of most episodes. Sign up on the podcast’s main page. You can even give membership as a gift!
    You can also support our podcasts through our sponsors:
    • Purchase a lightsaber from Level Up Sabers run by friend of the podcast Neighborhood Master Alan
    • Use Audible for audiobooks. Sign up for a one year membership or gift one through this link.
    • Purchase any media discussed this week through our sponsored links.
    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 2 mins
  • Gen V and Heroic Identity
    Dec 16 2025
    What happens when super-powered people exist primarily as commercial products? Gen V, the college-set spinoff of The Boys, explores a world where superhero status is less about heroism and more about corporate branding, entertainment value, and ruthless competition. At Godolkin University, young supes navigate a ranking system that treats them like gladiators while their powers—and identities—become marketing opportunities. Host Matthew Fox sits down with Ocean Murff to examine how this cynical universe reveals uncomfortable truths about exploitation, capitalism, and authentic self-expression.Questions we discussed:
    • What does The Boys universe reveal about superheroes if they had "the ethics of normal people" rather than mythic idealism?
    • How does Godolkin University's ranking system reflect real-world competition and commercialization of talent?
    • How does Jordan Li's gender-shifting ability work as both superpower and metaphor for non-binary identity?
    • How does the show critique corporate performative inclusion through Jordan's "trans-tastic" marketing storyline?

    **************************************************************************
    This episode is a production of Superhero Ethics, a The Ethical Panda Podcast and part of the TruStory FM Entertainment Podcast Network. Check our our website to find out more about this and our sister podcast Star Wars Generations.We want to hear from you! You can keep up with our latest news, and send us feedback, questions, or comments via social media or email.
    • Email: Matthew@TheEthicalPanda.com
    • Facebook: TheEthicalPanda
    • Instagram: TheEthicalPandaPodcasts
    • Twitter: EthicalPanda77
    • Or you can join jump into the Star Wars Generations and Superhero Ethics channels on the TruStory FM Discord.

    Want to get access to even more content while supporting the podcast? Become a member! For $5 a month, or $55 a year you get access to bonus episodes and bonus content at the end of most episodes. Sign up on the podcast’s main page. You can even give membership as a gift!
    You can also support our podcasts through our sponsors:
    • Purchase a lightsaber from Level Up Sabers run by friend of the podcast Neighborhood Master Alan
    • Use Audible for audiobooks. Sign up for a one year membership or gift one through this link.
    • Purchase any media discussed this week through our sponsored links.
    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 5 mins