Clean(ish) cover art

Clean(ish)

Eat (Mostly) Clean, Live (Mainly) Clean, and Unlock Your Body's Natural Ability to Self-Clean

 Preview

Get 30 days of Premium Plus free

£8.99/month after 30-day free trial. Cancel monthly.
Try for £0.00
More purchase options
Buy Now for £12.99

Buy Now for £12.99

About this listen

Clean(ish) leads listeners to a focus on real foods and a healthier home environment free of obvious toxins, without fixating on perfection. By living clean(ish), our bodies’ natural processes become streamlined and more effective, while we enjoy a vibrant life.

In Gin Stephens' New York Times best seller Fast. Feast. Repeat., she showed you how to fast (completely) clean as part of an intermittent fasting lifestyle. Now, whether you’re an intermittent faster or not, Gin shows you how to become clean(ish) where it counts: You’ll learn how to shift your choices so you’re not burdening your body with a bucket of chemicals, additives, and obesogens it wasn’t designed to handle.

Instead of aiming for perfection (which is impossible) or changing everything at once (which is hard, and rarely leads to lasting results), you’ll cut through the confusion, lose the fear, and embrace the freedom that comes from becoming clean(ish). As you learn how to lower your toxic load through small changes, smart swaps, and simple solutions, you’ll evolve simply and naturally toward a clean(ish) lifestyle that works for your body and your life!

©2022 Gin Stephens (P)2022 Macmillan Audio Diets, Nutrition & Healthy Eating Fitness, Diet & Nutrition Weight Loss & Weight Control Nutrition Healthy Diet
All stars
Most relevant
I'm overall very satisfied with the book. Jin Stevens is deligent at referencing her sources and clearly states when something is from literature, and when something is personal opinion.

HOWEVER as a researcher, it breaks my Post Doc heart that Jin Stevens feels the need to draw conclusions or ask the audience to draw conclusions from things that "possibly" are correlated, or supports a "possible" connection with anecdotal evidence, such as her family history. this is REALLY BAD because to a layman reading, "possibly" means "most likely", while for the researchers writing the journal articles she's referencing "possibly" basically means "there are indications but it might as well be pure randomness, there is no telling" (that is... "possibly" is code for "I invite you to investigate thisresea, because I didn't have the time, the want, or the money") - and Jin knows that, but sometimes seems to ignore it if there is a point she wants across.

Great book, but sometimes science best-practises take a backseat, and it really hurts the author's credibility

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Highly recommended - well written and very simple
To understand - I would recommend this book to anyone who’s interested in this topic

Amazing book

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Her first book was good. 2nd book not bad but much the same as the first book. This one is absolutely terrible.

Terrible Read. Very boring

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.