We Ran Quantum Circuits on Real Hardware — Here's What We Found — The Quantum Briefing
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
Before Kyon could route any customer's work to quantum hardware, we had to answer a harder question: which hardware actually performs? We ran a systematic head-to-head bake-off across three major cloud quantum providers — IBM Brisbane (127-qubit Eagle), IonQ Forte Enterprise (trapped-ion via AWS Braket), and Rigetti Cepheus-1 (108-qubit via AWS Braket) — using Bell state fidelity as the standardized benchmark. The winner would be featured in our first advertising campaign.
Topics covered:
- What Bell state fidelity is and why it predicts real algorithm performance
- Why IonQ Forte Enterprise won at 98.7% fidelity — and why it wasn't close
- How a 6-node Max-Cut problem returned 100% optimal results on live quantum hardware
- Where IBM Brisbane and Rigetti Cepheus-1 stood in the comparison
- What the entire bake-off cost (under $125) — and what that says about cloud quantum access in 2026
- The gap between "quantum hardware exists" and "quantum hardware solves your problem," and how Kyon closes it
Produced by TAI Creative — building Kyon, the first conversational quantum computing platform for business optimization.
🎙 Subscribe on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/033ENE9EqoFZnuXQrJFYbp
🎙 Subscribe on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-quantum-briefing/id6784487143
📧 Get The Quantum Briefing newsletter: https://taicreative.co/blog
🔬 Try Kyon: https://getkyon.com