The Slow Repricing: Who Pays for Climate Change?
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
Reinsurers cut catastrophe prices by up to 25% on 1 July. American homeowners still pay 46% more than in 2021. Both facts describe the same warming atmosphere.
We read the July 2026 renewal reports, the Munich Re and Swiss Re loss data, and EIOPA's protection-gap dashboard, and we follow the money from a Bermudian balance sheet to a renewal notice in Altadena.
Why does the reinsurance market cut prices in the middle of a warming trend it publicly acknowledges? Because reinsurers reprice every twelve months and can walk away. Primary carriers reprice through regulators, which takes years. Households never reprice at all — they pay, they cut cover, or they leave.
And when reinsurers gave up price this year, they kept the fine print. Attachment points held. Which leaves hail, flood and wildfire frequency sitting with primary carriers, and with their policyholders.
Featuring verbatim quotes from Thomas Blunck and Tobias Grimm (Munich Re), Balz Grollimund (Swiss Re), David Flandro (Howden Re), Jim Williamson (Everest Group), Petra Hielkema (EIOPA), Ishita Sen (Harvard Business School) and Günther Thallinger (Allianz).
Ten named sources. No fabricated quotes. No paywall.
Full article, free, with four charts
Free email tier or 2€ premium tier
The Veritas Brief is the podcast of Veritas Europaea, a reader-funded publication covering European political economy, finance and geopolitics. We take one story a week and we stay with it.