Jeremy Kyle speaks to royal historian Andrew Lownie as the crisis surrounding Prince Andrew intensifies, with suggestions any future trials linked to Jeffrey Epstein and Peter Mandelson could drag on for a year. The pair discuss Andrew’s growing isolation at Sandringham, including reports of a visit from the King’s domestic chaplain, and whether talk of repentance is genuine or simply reputation management. Lownie is blunt, arguing Andrew still appears more concerned with status and privilege than remorse, despite mounting public anger.

Attention then turns to the reported decision to bar Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie from Royal Ascot. Lownie describes the move as a highly symbolic distancing by King Charles, suggesting it may indicate deeper concerns within the palace about what could still emerge. He reiterates that the York daughters were adults during key moments of the Epstein saga and claims their business links and travel history deserve scrutiny as part of a wider pattern of royal networking and influence.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Kevin O’Sullivan is joined by historian and author Andrew Lownie to discuss the escalating Prince Andrew investigation and what he describes as a widening establishment scandal. Lownie argues that scrutiny must not stop with Andrew, insisting former palace officials, UK Trade & Investment figures and even senior royals should face serious questioning over what they knew and when. He claims there has been a long standing culture of secrecy and deference, warning that the public is no longer prepared to accept silence from the top.

Lownie also raises the stakes by suggesting the issue goes beyond personal misconduct, calling it a potential national security concern tied to Andrew’s international connections during his time as trade envoy. He questions whether key documents will ever be fully released and warns that kicking disclosures “into the long grass” will only fuel suspicion.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Angela Levin joins both Kevin O’Sullivan and Jeremy Kyle to tear into Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s latest trip to Jordan, branding it a “show off” exercise designed purely for headlines. Speaking about what she calls their third “pretend royal tour” after Nigeria and Colombia, Levin claims the Sussexes are driven by attention and rivalry, suggesting the visit is a direct response to Prince William’s recent Middle East trip. “They want to look better than William and Catherine,” she says, accusing Meghan of chasing photographs rather than delivering meaningful help.

In a separate interview, Levin turns to the deepening Prince Andrew scandal and growing scrutiny of King Charles. She argues the King never wanted Andrew as trade envoy and was ultimately “very pleased” when the role ended, but admits public trust in the monarchy is being tested “like never before.” On the Sussexes’ timing, she is scathing, calling the Jordan visit “disgusting” and alleging it is designed to distract from royal turmoil at home. As questions mount over Andrew, transparency and the future of the monarchy, Levin insists the institution can survive, but only if it navigates the crisis carefully and restores confidence.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jeremy Kyle speaks to former head of Royal Protection Dai Davies as questions intensify over what protection officers knew during Prince Andrew’s visits to Jeffrey Epstein’s properties. Davies says it is “eminently fair” that former Royal Protection officers are investigated, arguing that if they travelled with Andrew to locations in New York, the Virgin Islands and elsewhere, they “must have seen something.” He suggests officers would have conducted reconnaissance visits and liaised with local authorities, raising serious questions about what due diligence was carried out and whether warnings were ignored.

Davies goes further, alleging a long-running “conspiracy of silence” around Andrew’s conduct and calling for senior palace officials and potentially members of the Royal Family to be questioned if they were aware of relevant information. He argues that stripping Andrew of titles suggests those at the top were already convinced of serious wrongdoing, and insists the monarchy can only survive if it embraces full transparency and proves value for money. Without openness, he warns, public trust will continue to erode as the demand for accountability grows.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jeremy Kyle kicks off with US royal commentator Kinsey Schofield as the Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor scandal dominates headlines again, with Kyle pressing on why the government is refusing to release full files linked to Andrew and his trade envoy years. Schofield warns that holding documents back only fuels public suspicion, saying the public is “sick of” drip-fed revelations and wants “the full picture”. They also touch on the push to remove Andrew from the line of succession, with Schofield stressing it is legally complex and would need parliamentary action and wider Commonwealth agreement, while Kyle argues the court of public opinion has already turned and the monarchy needs sharper transparency to stop the story spiralling.

Later, author and historian Andrew Lownie tells Kyle the fallout could widen far beyond Andrew, arguing more palace staff, officials and former UK trade figures should be questioned about what they knew. Lownie says William and the King should be treated as potential “material witnesses” in terms of what the royal household knew and when, and claims the monarchy is at a crossroads where secrecy is no longer sustainable. He calls for a “reset” built on openness and proper scrutiny, warning the palace cannot rely on waiting for the problem to fade as anger grows and the questions keep coming.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Julia Hartley-Brewer speaks to historian and royal author Andrew Lownie about fresh parliamentary moves to release documents relating to Prince Andrew’s 2001 appointment as UK trade envoy. As MPs table a motion to force publication of government papers, Lownie warns of “a huge, huge scandal” that goes beyond financial and sexual allegations and could amount to a “national security scandal.” He argues Andrew was “helped and abetted by a whole series of people” and calls for ambassadors, former UK Trade & Investment officials and senior figures to be questioned under oath about what they knew and when.

The interview explores claims of a culture of “secrecy and deference” within the establishment, with Lownie suggesting senior figures, including the King, must have been aware of longstanding concerns about Andrew’s conduct. He calls for royal finances to face proper parliamentary scrutiny, unsealing of royal wills and removal of exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act. Questioning whether key documents will ever be released, Lownie predicts the issue could be delayed for years, warning that the establishment may seek to “kick this into the long grass” rather than allow full public accountability.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor denies any wrongdoing.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jeremy Kyle speaks to royal biographer Angela Levin about fresh allegations surrounding Prince Andrew’s expenses as UK trade envoy and the mounting reputational damage to the Royal Family. Levin describes the claims as “sickening” and calls Andrew “a very unpleasant human being,” warning the controversy is fuelling wider public anger and scrutiny over royal finances and transparency. The pair discuss whether the monarchy has lost prestige, with Levin arguing the institution can recover over time by focusing on the work of the King and senior working royals despite what she calls an “endless running” stream of damaging headlines.

The interview also explores growing pressure from the public, comparisons with the backlash after Princess Diana’s death, and concerns about declining trust in the monarchy. Levin says the current anger will “calm down” but admits it will be “harder” for the Royal Family in the short term, while Jeremy Kyle highlights calls for greater accountability and openness. The conversation widens to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, with Levin claiming the Sussexes are focused on protecting their “brand” as the wider royal crisis continues to dominate global headlines.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jeremy Kyle speaks to US royal commentator Kinsey Schofield about the escalating Prince Andrew scandal, fresh allegations over taxpayer-funded expenses during his time as UK trade envoy, and the growing pressure on King Charles. Discussing claims that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor charged personal massages to the public purse, Schofield remarks that he may have heard “public service and thought it meant the public service is him,” adding that he has “become a joke” amid what she calls “the worst crisis the monarchy has seen in my lifetime.” They also examine reports of a protest stunt at the Louvre, underlining the global reputational damage facing the Royal Family.

The conversation explores mounting calls for accountability, transparency over royal finances, and whether Prince Andrew should be removed from the line of succession. Schofield explains that such a move would require new legislation and agreement across the Commonwealth, while Kyle argues public scrutiny of the monarchy is only intensifying. Despite the controversy, Schofield defends the constitutional monarchy as a vital source of political neutrality and soft power, warning that losing it could risk the kind of deep political polarisation seen in the United States.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.