The Revenue Isn’t Missing. It’s Leaking. cover art

The Revenue Isn’t Missing. It’s Leaking.

The Revenue Isn’t Missing. It’s Leaking.

Listen for free

View show details

LIMITED TIME OFFER

£0.99/mo for 3 months - terms apply. Offer ends 24 August 2026.
The Revenue Isn’t Missing. It’s Leaking.Most companies assume that getting more growth requires adding something.* More campaigns.* More headcount.* More technology.* More outbound.* More content.* More pressure.But sometimes the revenue is not missing because the company lacks activity.It is missing because the operating system underneath all that activity is leaking.I was thinking about this while walking Dusty and Tanner. If Dusty pulls toward something in the bushes and I ignore the first small movement, the whole walk can change. Tanner notices. The leashes cross. One of them sees a squirrel. Suddenly, we are not walking in one direction anymore. We are negotiating with two dogs and untangling two leashes.The original deviation was small. The compound effect was not.That is the B2B version of the butterfly effect.A lead receives a late response. An opportunity enters the pipeline too early. A sales handoff loses important context. A customer misses an onboarding milestone. An expansion signal goes unnoticed. None of those moments appears catastrophic by itself. But repeat them across hundreds of leads, dozens of deals, and an entire customer base, and they become material revenue problems.The late response becomes a lower inbound conversion rate. The early opportunity becomes an inflated forecast. The poor handoff becomes a longer sales cycle. The missed onboarding milestone becomes churn. The ignored usage signal becomes lost expansion ARR. Companies often respond by adding more speed. But when Dusty and Tanner’s leashes are tangled, walking faster does not solve anything. It makes the knot tighter. You have to stop. Untangle the leashes. Reset the direction. Then start moving again.That is what good GTM Operations should do. It untangles the operating system before the company attempts to scale it.The ROI question usually comes too earlyLeadership teams understandably ask: “What is the ROI of fixing GTM Operations?”It sounds like a financially responsible question.* But what happens when the system is too broken to measure accurately?* What is the close rate when every seller defines an opportunity differently?* What is pipeline coverage when stale deals remain open?* What is marketing conversion when inbound leads sit untouched?* What is retention performance when onboarding milestones are not tracked?* What is expansion performance when opportunities live in CSM notes instead of a repeatable process?When the data is unreliable and the process is inconsistent, the company cannot confidently measure the ROI of fixing GTM. It first has to fix enough of the system to create a credible baseline.That is why the first stage in my Growth Framework is Gauge.Gauge is where you stop pretending the dashboard is the business. You establish what is actually happening. * How quickly are leads followed up?* When is an opportunity created?* Where does the sales cycle stall?* Which pipeline is real?* Where do customers lose momentum?* How is renewal risk identified?* Who owns expansion?First, you Gauge it. Then you walk the dog. Then you fix the leaks that compound into ARR.Walking the dog - The Butterfly Effect of GTM: How 1% Improvements Compound Into ARRThe Walking the Dogs GTM ROI Calculator models several modest operational improvements.* Close rate moves from 15% to 16%.* Gross retention moves from 85% to 86%.* The sales cycle moves from 90 days to 75 days.* Expansion close rate moves from 15% to 16%.Nothing doubles. There is no heroic forecast. But the changes compound. In the expected scenario, the ROI example model with example data, I share a view that approximately $3.7 million in additional ARR. after a $1 million GTM investment, can becomes roughly $2.7 million in net ARR gain. The model estimates a 3.7-times gross ARR return and a 273% net ROI. It also shows approximately $311,000 in monthly missed ARR opportunity while the company delays action. Those numbers are illustrative and the calculator is not a magic forecast. It is a decision model.The purpose of the ROI calculator is to make the invisible cost of operational friction more visible. The example company is already spending the money. Sales and marketing were already working. Customer success was already managing accounts. The additional ARR comes from making that existing investment work better.The real question: How much are we losing?The question is not simply: “Can we justify investing in GTM Operations?” The better question is: “How much are we already losing because the system is tangled?”* How much demand is being wasted through slow routing?* How much pipeline is unreliable because stage definitions are inconsistent?* How much revenue is delayed by poor handoffs?* How much ARR is lost because onboarding risk appears too late?* How much expansion depends on intuition rather than signals?The ROI does not come from the spreadsheet. It comes from untangling the system.So, what dog does your company need to walk?* Pick...
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No reviews yet