For years, Canada's housing strategy focused on increasing the number of housing units built. But even during periods of record apartment construction, family-sized homes became increasingly scarce.

In this episode of the Demografix, Mike Moffatt and Cara Stern unpack a major problem hidden inside Canada's housing statistics: the country is building fewer family-sized homes than it did 20 years ago.

Why are three-bedroom homes becoming so difficult to find? Why are developers building more small condos instead of homes for families? And how do zoning rules, development charges, land shortages, and housing policies shape what gets built?

The conversation explores:

• Why housing "units" and housing "homes" are not the same thing
• The dramatic decline in single-detached homes, semis, and townhouses
• Why family-sized condos remain rare and expensive
• How rising land costs and government policies affect housing supply
• The connection between housing affordability and Canada's falling birth rate
• Why many young families are leaving major cities
• Policy solutions that could help create more family-friendly housing

If Canada wants cities that work for young families, workers, and future generations, we need to start measuring success by more than just the number of housing units built.

Chapters:

00:55 What Families Actually Need In A Home

02:00 Why Three-Bedroom Apartments Are So Rare

04:09 Why Condos Stop Making Sense For Families

05:00 Canada Is Building Fewer Family-Sized Homes

07:06 The Problem With Counting “Units” Instead Of Homes

09:03 Who Shoebox Condos Actually Work For

10:07 If Demand Is Strong, Why Aren’t Builders Responding?

12:14 Why The GTA Builds Fewer Family Homes

14:02 Urban Boundaries, Sprawl, And Long Commutes

15:16 Taxes And Fees That Favor McMansions

16:52 Why Developers Don’t Build Family-Sized Apartments

18:28 Housing Costs, Birth Rates, And Families Leaving Cities

22:05 How Canada Could Fix Family Housing

Research/links:

From Policy Gridlock to Housing Growth: A Roadmap for Gentle Density

https://www.missingmiddleinitiative.ca/p/from-policy-gridlock-to-housing-growth

Hosted by Mike Moffatt & Cara Stern & Sabrina Maddeaux

Produced by Meredith Martin

Funded by the Neptis Foundation https://neptis.org/

The 2026 FIFA World Cup is finally here and Canada is on a roll! But as the excitement builds on the pitch, we're asking the tough questions: will this massive event actually deliver the economic win that was promised?

In this episode, Mike Moffatt and Sabrina Maddeaux dive into the real costs of hosting the world's biggest party. They break down the billion-dollar price tags, FIFA's business model, and whether taxpayers are getting stuck with the bill while others reap the rewards. (Producer note: This episode was recorded on June 5th, 2026.)

Topics covered:

• The economics of hosting the FIFA World Cup
• Why economists question projected economic benefits
• Public spending on stadiums, security, and infrastructure
• Tourism displacement and local business impacts
• Housing, short-term rentals, and affordability concerns
• FIFA's revenue model and tax treatment
• Transit, traffic, and quality-of-life effects for residents
• Lessons from previous World Cup host countries
• Dynamic ticket pricing and the changing fan experience

If you enjoy thoughtful discussions on housing, infrastructure, public policy, and the economic issues affecting Canada's middle class, subscribe for more episodes from The Missing Middle.

Chapters:

00:00 The World Cup's Economic Myth
00:49 The Benefits Nobody Talks About
03:32 Can Hosting the World Cup Actually Lose Money?
05:11 Why More Tourists Doesn't Mean More Growth
07:00 Who's Really Paying the $1 Billion Bill?
08:23 FIFA's Billion-Dollar Business Model
09:19 Cities Pay, FIFA Profits
10:39 The Tax Breaks You Didn't Know About
12:27 The Hidden Costs for Residents
15:21 What Past World Cups Teach Us
17:07 Are These Games Worth the Price?
17:49 Why World Cup Tickets Are Exploding in Cost
19:22 The People's Game or a VIP Experience?

Research:

BMO Capital Markets -- Canada World Cup GDP boost (up to $6.5B):

https://www.wealthprofessional.ca/news/industry-news/bmo-world-cup-2026-set-to-deliver-up-to-c65-billion-economic-boost-for-canada/392593

The World Cup is expensive, but it’s our turn to pick up the tab

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/soccer/article-the-world-cup-is-expensive-but-its-our-turn-to-pick-up-the-tab/

ProPublica -- 'You do, you pay, we take': how FIFA's host city deals work:

https://www.propublica.org/article/world-cup-2026-host-cities-revenue-houston

CBC -- FIFA/Deloitte economic impact assessment for Canada ($3.8B figure):

https://www.cbc.ca/sports/soccer/world-cup-2026-canada-fifa-economic-benefits-1.7406435

BNN Bloomberg -- Why economic impact on Vancouver and Toronto may never be known:

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/business/economics/2026/05/11/blind-side-why-world-cup-economic-impact-on-vancouver-and-toronto-may-never-be-known/

Bloomberg Tax -- FIFA 2026 World Cup tax demands on host countries:

https://news.bloombergtax.com/tax-management-international/fifa-2026-world-cup-blows-the-whistle-on-complex-tax-risks

CP24 -- Toronto holds transit fares steady; NJ Transit $48M bill; Boston $80 game-day fare:

https://www.cp24.com/local/toronto/2026/04/16/toronto-will-not-hike-cost-of-transit-during-world-cup-as-other-host-cities-announce-big-fare-increases-to-venues/

ESPN -- World Cup ticket sticker shock and dynamic pricing:

https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/48947095/2026-fifa-world-cup-sticker-shock-ugly-cost-beautiful-game-grand-event

Victor Matheson / Holy Cross -- The Economics of the World Cup (academic; stadium white elephants, tourism overestimates):

https://hcapps.holycross.edu/hcs/RePEc/hcx/HC1805-Matheson_WorldCup.pdf

Hosted by Mike Moffatt & Cara Stern & Sabrina Maddeaux

Produced by Meredith Martin

Funded by the Neptis Foundation https://neptis.org/

Canada's Federal Housing Advocate says it could take until 2060 for all Canadians to have access to an affordable home. Is that just a realistic target? And is it reasonable to ask an entire generation to give up on their homeownership dreams for the next 3.5 decades?

This week on DemograFix, Mike and Cara dive into the idea of “housing triage”: should governments focus on ending homelessness first, then tackle affordable housing for low-income Canadians, and only later address the middle-class housing crisis? Or is that a false choice?

They discuss:
-Why some advocates think housing should be solved in stages.
-Whether building more market-rate homes actually helps reduce homelessness.
-What a 2060 affordability target means for young Canadians trying to build a life.
-The politics of falling home prices—and why governments avoid the conversation.
-Whether Canada can solve the housing crisis without asking a generation to wait decades for a home.

Can we afford to prioritize one housing crisis over another? Or does solving the housing shortage mean tackling them all at once?

#Housing #CanadaHousing #HousingCrisis #RealEstate #AffordableHousing #Homeownership #CanadianPolitics #HousingPolicy #MissingMiddlePodcast

Chapters:

00:00 Housing Triage: Who Should Be Helped First?

00:01 What Is the Federal Housing Advocate?

00:03 Why the Report Says Housing Won't Be Affordable Until 2060

00:05 Should Young Canadians Accept a Lifetime of Unaffordability?

00:07 The Flaw in Treating Housing Like a Zero-Sum Game

00:09 Why Building More Homes Helps Reduce Homelessness

00:11 Can Canada Solve the Housing Crisis Within a Decade?

00:13 Why Governments Keep Missing Housing Targets

00:14 The Politics of Lower Home Prices

00:17 What Happens If Young Canadians Give Up on Canada?

Hosted by Mike Moffatt & Cara Stern & Sabrina Maddeaux

Produced by Meredith Martin

Funded by the Neptis Foundation https://neptis.org/