Send us Fan Mail

The educator’s answer to Part 1, and it comes from Porto. At FAUP — the school shaped by Fernando Távora, Álvaro Siza and Eduardo Souto de Moura — spatial intuition isn’t treated as a mystical gift but as a systematically trained muscle. Three anchors hold it: (1) freehand drawing as an analytical instrument rather than a presentation tool, forcing the slow cognitive digestion of scale and shadow that software bypasses; (2) buildings understood as extensions of landscape, where students design the voids between volumes; and (3) space tied to the physical weight of materials. Shifting a studio from image-making back to space-making is the most impactful intervention a tutor can make.

Then four exercises you could put into a syllabus tomorrow. (1) Design a bathhouse or small library or similar space through a 1:20 hand-drawn section, with floor plans banned for a fortnight and a human figure in every room. (2) Build a 30 cm box, cut apertures to a real sun path, and photograph the light inside it at 9am, noon and 4pm — no rendering allowed. Sense of materiality and texture at 1:1 scale. (3) Map an urban site by continuous freehand panorama with no photographs permitted, then carve it in foam. And (4) enforce a digital detox for the first thirty per cent of the project: cardboard and clay only, software introduced once the massing has survived a desk crit. I can imagine the department meeting this would provoke — because the FAUP Porto method asks far more of the tutor.

© 2026 Talk Architecture, Author: Naziaty Mohd Yaacob. Image: FAUP Porto's second year 1:500 model in 2015 taken by Naziaty Mohd Yaacob

Support the show

Do subscribe for premium content and special features which will help to support and sustain Talk Architecture podcast on a more in-depth explanation on design thesis and processes. These special commentaries and ‘how to’ explanations are valuable insights and knowledge not found elsewhere!

Send us Fan Mail

Why is there such a lack of quality in spatial design among architecture students? I’ve watched this for a decade, and the research is clear that it isn’t a shortage of talent — it’s a systemic shift in how architecture is taught and conceptualised. Five drivers: (1) the Instagrammability of architecture, where a building is judged by one two-dimensional render rather than the experience of moving through it; (2) over-reliance on digital tools, where students jump straight into Rhino or Revit before mastering anything by hand; (3) curriculum overload, where sustainability, computational design and social justice crowd out the hours once given to spatial composition; (4) theoretical dominance, where a politically charged thesis outscores volumetric quality; and (5) disconnection from physical reality.

Some of this hits me in the gut. Trendy geometries and photorealistic lighting are exactly what I was arguing against the last time I taught second year — I once banned circular forms from a project outright, and the students didn’t like it. We used to work through Francis D.K. Ching’s Form, Space and Order sketch by sketch, and you could genuinely master spatial design that way. Phenomenology, tectonic clarity, proportion: these are core competencies, not electives. They should occupy sixty per cent of a student’s week, not ten. Digital modelling belongs in production drawings, not in the thinking.

© 2026 Talk Architecture, Author: Naziaty Mohd Yaacob. Image: Overlay on F.D.K.Ching 's book page by Naziaty Mohd Yaacob

Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify

Support the show

Do subscribe for premium content and special features which will help to support and sustain Talk Architecture podcast on a more in-depth explanation on design thesis and processes. These special commentaries and ‘how to’ explanations are valuable insights and knowledge not found elsewhere!

Send us Fan Mail

**Senior-friendly housing in Malaysia needs to move beyond multigenerational units to support true ageing in place.** The episode challenges the assumption that most elderly parents will live with adult children and highlights the full care spectrum—from independent to assisted living and nursing care—calling for affordable, evidence-based designs, home retrofits, and policies that serve middle- and lower-income groups rather than marketing trends alone. Developers should exceed basic Malaysian standards by adopting universal design that benefits seniors, families with children, expectant mothers, and persons with disabilities.

Singapore provides useful models through inclusive projects such as the Punggol Regional Library and HDB community care apartments featuring accessible layouts, grab bars, and adaptable spaces. Independent living also depends on barrier-free homes, seamless mobility, and accessible public transport, malls, and community facilities. With an ageing population projected for 2040, Malaysia must apply universal design across homes, neighbourhoods, and public spaces so seniors can remain active and included in society.

© 2026 Talk Architecture, Author: Naziaty Mohd Yaacob. Image: Naziaty Mohd Yaacob

Support the show

Do subscribe for premium content and special features which will help to support and sustain Talk Architecture podcast on a more in-depth explanation on design thesis and processes. These special commentaries and ‘how to’ explanations are valuable insights and knowledge not found elsewhere!