Ladies and gentlemen, we here at Split the Corner want to go on record and wish everyone the happiest National Thomas Crapper Day that you or anyone you know has ever experienced. Today we take a moment to celebrate this man and his irrefutable contributions not only to the world of indoor plumbing, but to society and to humankind as a whole. That is a really tough act to follow, but Kaz and Kyle are going to give it a try as they embark on a discussion based around choosing your own path by inserting themselves into different scenarios involving television. What friend group would they want to hang out with from a TV show? Is there a particular family or even just a house that they would have liked to grow up in? It's a game of hypotheticals on today's episode and, as always, we've got some pretty strong opinions coming your way!

In a world where people are constantly talking about things being a "flex", we here at Split the Corner believe we have found the ultimate one. Whatever could it be, you ask? How about inventing something and then naming it after yourself? And not only inventing something and then naming it after yourself, but that invention or discovery having the staying power to have it be discussed on a podcast in the year 2026? On today's episode of Split the Corner, Kaz and Kyle are diving into a handful of things that took this naming flex and ran with it. The guys are talking items of clothing, food, ice-sculpted water fowl, workout routines, poor ranching techniques, and a whole lot more. You might even learn a thing or two about riots inspired by vegetarianism.

Who would have thought that National Cheese Day would be a polarizing topic for discussion? The boys at Split the Corner...that's who. After doing absolutely no research on the topic whatsoever, we have confirmed that this debate on cheese is the first of it's kind on whether cheese should be on everything or not...and the results may surprise you. After Kaz and Kyle hash out their differences on the validity of cheese as a main event player, we are taking a deep dive into the justifications of unwarranted origin stories. Using The Wizard of Oz as the catalyst, the boys are discussing who or what gives anyone the right to provide a backstory to intellectual property that they didn't come up with. Where is the line between fan fiction and canon? Can you buy a piece of art and draw on it to make it fit your idea of what it should be? And if you can't do that with a painting, what gives a person the right to do it with the written word? If you were looking for hot takes on IP and a deep dive into the world of Oz, whether it's popular or not, then you have come to the right place. Cheers!