What if everything we think we know about biological order is completely backward?

Three hundred thousand times a year, emergency room defibrillators hit dying human hearts with 200 joules of electricity—a brute-force "sledgehammer" that resets the organ but ignores how it actually works. But in 1992, UCLA researchers stopped a fibrillating rabbit heart using only a "whisper" of electricity. They didn't use brute force; they used geometry. By reading the mathematical shape of the heart's chaos, they proved that chaos is not the enemy of control—it is the friend of control.

In this special extended episode of Relatively Human, we explore a profound, intuition-shattering scientific thesis: life doesn't fight chaos, it uses the geometry of chaos. Across four distinct biological scales, we discover that a perfectly regular heartbeat is actually a deadly warning sign. A healthy heart requires rich, high-dimensional variability to adapt; when it loses that complex chaos, it becomes dangerously rigid and prone to failure.

The exact same mathematical inversion occurs in the brain. While an epileptic seizure looks like a chaotic electrical storm on an EEG monitor, it is actually a pathological collapse of complexity—billions of neurons hypersynchronizing into a rigid, low-dimensional loop. Health is high-dimensional chaos; disease is a collapse in dimension.

Pushing deeper into the science, we explore how life naturally poises itself at the "edge of chaos," a critical boundary that maximizes a system's ability to process and transmit information without falling into absolute turbulence or frozen rigidity. We trace this boundary from the power-law "avalanches" of firing neural circuits down to the smallest scale: Stuart Kauffman's Boolean gene networks. At this critical boundary, the mathematics remarkably predicts that the ~25,000 human genes should produce roughly 158 stable attractors—a number that beautifully mirrors the ~200 to 300 actual cell types found in the human body.

In this rigorous, mind-bending masterclass, we connect the topological "scroll waves" of a dying heart to the statistical repertoires of conscious brains. Ultimately, we pose one of the most beautiful open questions in science: do the fractal dimension of a coastline, the Fisher information rank of a statistical model, and the attractor dimension of a beating heart all measure the exact same underlying mathematical quantity?.

Tune in to discover why the system isn't breaking because it's chaotic—it's breaking because its chaos is changing shape.

If the universe is deterministic, why can’t we predict the future? And if the future is genuinely unpredictable, how does anything as fragile as a heartbeat or a thought persist from one moment to the next?

In the popular imagination, "chaos" means randomness, disorder, and destruction. In reality, chaos has a shape.

In this episode of Relatively Human, we explore one of the most profound mathematical discoveries of the 20th century: chaotic systems are trajectory-unpredictable, but statistically determined. We unpack the load-bearing mathematical chain—from Lyapunov exponents to the Kaplan-Yorke dimension to the SRB measure—to reveal how chaotic dynamics write fractal geometry, and how that geometry dictates statistical reality.

Then, we cross into the biology. We discover that life doesn't fight chaos—it relies on the shape of chaos to survive. We track the exact same mathematical structures across four vastly different scales of living systems:

• Ecology (Tier 1): How Robert May’s logistic map proved that catastrophic population crashes in fisheries aren't always environmental bad luck—they are intrinsic deterministic chaos.

• The Heart (Tier 1): How ventricular fibrillation is not electrical randomness, but organized spatiotemporal chaos driven by topological "scroll waves". We review the landmark 1992 experiment where scientists controlled a dying, chaotic heart not with brute-force shocks, but with tiny electrical nudges calculated from the attractor's own geometry.

• The Brain (Tier 2): Why an epileptic seizure is not an explosion of chaos, but a catastrophic drop in attractor dimension—a pathological collapse into rigid order.

• Gene Networks (Tier 2): How operating at the "edge of chaos" allows a genome to produce the exact right number of distinct cell types to build a human body.

The Rule of the Show: As always, every claim is confidence-scored. We clearly divide the rigorous bedrock of ergodic theory and cardiac models (Tier 1) from the actively debated, cutting-edge hypotheses of neuroscience and clinical heart rate variability (Tier 2).

Chaos is not the enemy of biological function. It is the mechanism.

1. Lorenz, E. N. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20(2), 130–141.
2. Kaplan, J. L., & Yorke, J. A. (1979). Chaotic behavior of multidimensional difference equations. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 730, 204–227.
3. Eckmann, J.-P., & Ruelle, D. (1985). Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors. Reviews of Modern Physics, 57(3), 617–656.
4. May, R. M. (1976). Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature, 261, 459–467.
5. Weiss, J. N., Garfinkel, A., Karagueuzian, H. S., Qu, Z., & Chen, P.-S. (1999). Chaos and the transition to ventricular fibrillation. Circulation, 99(21), 2819-2826.
6. Garfinkel, A., Spano, M. L., Ditto, W. L., & Weiss, J. N. (1992). Controlling cardiac chaos. Science, 257, 1230–1235.
7. Kleiger, R. E., Miller, J. P., Bigger, J. T., & Moss, A. J. (1987). Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. American Journal of Cardiology, 59, 256–262.
8. Babloyantz, A., & Destexhe, A. (1986). Low-dimensional chaos in an instance of epilepsy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 83, 3513–3517.
9. Beggs, J. M., & Plenz, D. (2003). Neuronal avalanches in neocortical circuits. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 11167–11177.
10. Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford University Press.

What do a devastating summer heatwave, the dynamic stripes of a growing zebrafish, the power brick charging your laptop, and the fault-tolerant core of a quantum computer all have in common?

For decades, science has filed these phenomena into completely different cabinets: meteorology, biology, electrical engineering, and quantum mechanics. But if you strip away the specific materials—the wind, the pigment, the electrons—nature is secretly reusing the exact same geometric trick over and over again.

In this mind-bending episode of Relatively Human, Sarah and theoretical physicist Dr. Aris take you on a scientific detective journey to uncover the deep mathematical blueprints that govern our universe. We begin in the chaotic skies of 1963 with Edward Lorenz's discovery of the "Butterfly Effect," before learning how an abstract topological rule called the Poincaré-Hopf theorem (the "Hairy Ball Theorem") mathematically forces the atmosphere to create swirling storms. From there, we explore the planetary traffic jams of Quasi-Resonant Amplification (QRA) and shrink a hurricane down to the size of a single electron to witness anyons—quantum topological singularities that physically remember their own pasts.

Bridging the gap into the visible world, we explore Alan Turing’s 1952 reaction-diffusion models to see how zebrafish paint their own stripes, and dive into the circuits of your laptop charger to discover how human engineers unwittingly replicated nature's exact resonant blueprints using Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS).

Finally, we step out onto the bleeding edge of speculative physics (Tier 3) to ask a massive question: Are these phenomena just a coincidence, or is this all one single mathematical entity? Discover why moderate "leaky" resonators with a Q-factor of 3 to 10 might just be the universal grammar of everything.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Top 10 Citations:

1. Lorenz, E.N. (1963). "Deterministic nonperiodic flow." J. Atmos. Sci., 20(2), 130–141.

2. Poincaré, H. (1885). "Sur les courbes définies par les équations différentielles." J. Math. Pures Appl., 4e série, 1, 167–244.

3. Hopf, H. (1926). "Vektorfelder in n-dimensionalen Mannigfaltigkeiten." Math. Ann., 96(1), 225–250.

4. Petoukhov, V., et al. (2013). "Quasiresonant amplification of planetary waves..." PNAS, 110(14), 5336–5341.

5. Delplace, P., et al. (2017). "Topological origin of equatorial waves." Science, 358(6366), 1075–1077.

6. Thouless, D.J., et al. (1982). "Quantized Hall conductance..." Phys. Rev. Lett., 49(6), 405–408.

7. Kitaev, A.Yu. (2003). "Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons." Ann. Phys., 303(1), 2–30.

8. Nakamura, J., et al. (2020). "Direct observation of anyonic braiding statistics." Nat. Phys., 16, 931–936.

9. Turing, A.M. (1952). "The chemical basis of morphogenesis." Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 237(641), 37–72.

10. Liu, K.H., et al. (1986). "Resonant switches—Topologies and characteristics." IEEE Trans. Power Electron., PE-1(1), 62–73.

RELATIVELY HUMAN — S1E7: "When Weather Gets Stuck"

Episode Description Why does weather get "stuck" in relentless heat domes or catastrophic floods? We discard the outdated idea of the jet stream as a stable "river" of air, exploring it instead as an unstable, wave-channeling gradient boundary skidding over planetary topography. We trace the convergence of four scientific frontiers explaining our changing weather:

1. Climate Dynamics: Arctic amplification weakens the equator-to-pole temperature gradient, altering the atmosphere's waveguide. Quasi-Resonant Amplification (QRA) traps planetary waves, sparking events like the 2021 Pacific Northwest Heat Dome via soil moisture feedbacks. We also explore how Recurrent Rossby Wave Packets (RRWPs) drive extreme Australian heatwaves.
2. Nonlinear Dynamics: We uncover the counterintuitive discovery that persistent atmospheric blocking is actually more chaotic and unstable than normal weather, representing Unstable Periodic Orbits (UPOs) in the atmosphere's high-dimensional phase space.
3. Statistical Mechanics: Ruelle linear response theory allows scientists to predict how a chaotic climate system's statistics shift under continuous greenhouse gas forcing, a breakthrough demonstrated in state-of-the-art coupled models like the MPI-ESM.
4. Prediction Science: The "signal-to-noise paradox" reveals the real atmosphere carries a stronger, more predictable signal than models capture. We discuss how missing dynamics, particularly eddy feedbacks, drive this multi-causal problem, and why atmospheric predictability "flickers" from decade to decade.

From debates over waveguidability to predicting changes in the climate's attractor dimension, we explore the physics of stalling weather.

Citation List

• Ali, S. M., et al. (2022). Recurrent Rossby waves during Southeast Australian heatwaves and links to quasi-resonant amplification and atmospheric blocks. Weather and Climate Dynamics.
• Blackport, R., & Screen, J. A. (2020). Insignificant effect of Arctic amplification on the amplitude of midlatitude atmospheric waves. Science Advances, 6(8).
• De Cruz, L., et al. (2018). Exploring the Lyapunov instability properties of high-dimensional atmospheric and climate models. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 25, 387–412.
• Hardiman, S. C., et al. (2022). Missing eddy feedback may explain weak signal-to-noise ratios in climate predictions. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 5(57).
• Lembo, V., Lucarini, V., & Ragone, F. (2020). Beyond Forcing Scenarios: Predicting Climate Change through Response Operators in a Coupled General Circulation Model. Scientific Reports, 10, 8668.
• Li, X., et al. (2024). Role of atmospheric resonance and land-atmosphere feedbacks as a precursor to the June 2021 Pacific Northwest Heat Dome event. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(4).
• Lucarini, V., & Gritsun, A. (2020). A new mathematical framework for atmospheric blocking events. Climate Dynamics, 54, 575–598.
• Weisheimer, A., et al. (2024). The Signal-to-Noise Paradox in Climate Forecasts: Revisiting Our Understanding and Identifying Future Priorities. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 105(3).
• Wirth, V., & Polster, C. (2021). The Problem of Diagnosing Jet Waveguidability in the Presence of Large-Amplitude Eddies. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 78(10).

You started as a single cell containing roughly 750 megabytes of data—less than what is currently stored in the photo album on your smartphone. From that tiny archive, your body constructed 37 trillion cells, 200 distinct cell types, and a brain with 86 billion neurons wired in a network so complex we lack the mathematics to fully describe it.

In this episode, we tackle one of the most fundamental puzzles in biology: Where did all that information come from?.

For decades, we’ve been taught that DNA is a "blueprint". But our guest argues that this metaphor is fundamentally broken. According to the Data Processing Inequality—a bedrock theorem of information theory—if the genome were a blueprint being read like a linear chain, you should actually be simpler than your DNA, not astronomically more complex.

Instead, this episode introduces a radical new framework: The Algorithmic Decompression Architecture. In this view, your genome is not a blueprint, but a seed—a brilliantly compressed, ancient program that has been running since the moment of fertilization.

We go deep into the mechanics of how you were built, exploring:

• The Information Gap: How a single molecular "index" event can cascade into a functional state space with more digits than there are atoms in the observable universe.

• Thermodynamic Reality: How every bit of your development was "paid for" in heat, funded by your mother’s metabolism and governed by the Landauer limit.

• The Memory Kernel: The provocative claim that your cells carry a "non-Markovian" memory of their developmental history—meaning your body might "remember" the sunlight of your first home or a childhood fever in its very molecular structure.

• The Decisive Experiment: How scientists are using CRISPR-based lineage recording to test whether you are the result of a pre-determined "landscape" or an ongoing computation that integrates every signal from your environment.

This conversation shifts the perspective of life from a passive readout of a message to an active, unfolding storm of complexity. You are not just a product of your genes; you are the ongoing output of a four-billion-year-old program extracting order from the world.

Listen in to discover why the universe "charged you by the bit" to exist, and how the memory of your journey is written in the shape of every branch of your biological tree..

This episode explores the provocative thesis that the difference between a state’s total collapse and its long-term survival is not found in its ideology, but in its underlying information architecture. By contrasting the Khmer Rouge’s rapid collapse in 1979 with Deng Xiaoping’s pragmatic stabilization of China in 1978, the discussion examines why nearly identical Communist ideologies produced diametrically opposite outcomes.

At the heart of this analysis is the "Purge Equation," a mathematically predictable cascade in which a state’s survival mechanism becomes decoupled from its resource generation as ideological zealots competitively exclude the technocrats needed to maintain the system. The episode bridges the gap between history and hard science, mapping political dynamics onto Gause's Competitive Exclusion Principle from ecology and Peter Turchin’s Political Stress Indicator (Ψ) to identify the signatures of a system approaching a terminal bifurcation.

Listeners will discover the concept of "critical slowing down," a physical signature of declining resilience that manifests as increasing rigidity in both failing ecosystems and fanatic regimes. The episode concludes by applying these structural lenses to the contemporary United States, assessing whether the institutional features that maintain high "effective dimensionality"—such as federalism and a free press—are being preserved or eroded. Ultimately, the conversation demonstrates that a state’s ability to protect the feedback channels carrying accurate negative information is the single most important variable separating adaptation from catastrophe.

In January 2025, the engineers at PsiQuantum achieved a milestone that had eluded the field for decades: a manufacturable, fault-tolerant photonic quantum computing chipset. But buried in their breakthrough was a fundamental physics problem: you cannot create a photon with absolute certainty, meaning the machine had to be built from inherently unreliable parts. To make it work, they devised a brilliant architecture involving probabilistic generation, heralded verification, and massive multiplexing to turn stochastic noise into reliable computation.

But they weren't the first to invent it. As we reveal in this episode of Relatively Human, that exact architectural strategy was deployed two billion years ago inside your own cells. We explore the eerie structural convergence between the world’s newest quantum computer and the mitochondrial respiratory chain. It turns out that the engineering solution for extracting reliable work from stochastic quantum events is universal, whether you are building with silicon waveguides or biological proteins.

We take you down to the nanometer scale to witness the machinery of life operating at the quantum edge. You will meet the electron transport chain, where electrons tunnel across protein gaps in a display of raw quantum mechanics. You will see ATP synthase, a biological rotary motor that spins at 8,000 RPM with near-perfect thermodynamic efficiency, producing your body weight in fuel every single day. The parallel we draw is not a metaphor; it is a precise, four-part engineering match regarding how systems verify and deploy resources.

Why does this convergence happen? We move beyond the biology to the information theory that constrains it. From Ashby’s Law of Requisite Variety to the thermodynamic costs of Landauer’s Principle, we examine the deep physical laws that force different engineers—human and evolutionary—to the same solutions. We ask the hard question: Is this architectural match a coincidence, or is it a hidden theorem of physics we haven’t discovered yet?

Join us for a journey that moves from the clean rooms of a semiconductor foundry to the inner membrane of the mitochondrion. We strictly separate established science from speculation, distinguishing where the mechanisms differ and where the architecture aligns. This is a story about the limits of physics, the creativity of evolution, and the humbling realization that nature solved our hardest engineering problems long before we even knew they existed.

In 1925, Ronald Fisher created a formula to estimate parameters from noisy data. Today, Fisher information has escaped statistics to become a fundamental quantity in quantum mechanics, evolutionary biology, and thermodynamics. From the Heisenberg uncertainty principle to the rate of natural selection, the same mathematical structure governs the flow of information.

This episode of Relatively Human investigates the "Cramér-Rao bound"—a universal speed limit on knowledge—and Chentsov’s proof that Fisher information is the unique metric of probability space. We then explore the leading theories explaining this mystery: Roy Frieden’s controversial proposal that information generates physics, and the Dimensional Scaling framework’s conjecture that Fisher information measures the effective dimensionality of our world. Join us as we hunt for Fisher’s ghost in the machine of reality.