On this episode of Reaganism, Roger Zakheim sits down with Rich Goldberg to discuss the U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding and its immediate implications for sanctions relief, oil exports, and financial access for Iran. Roger and Rich unpacked how the deal differs from the JCPOA, emphasizing that while the agreement creates a short-term window for Iran to sell oil and access frozen assets, it does not restore the broader, long-term sanctions relief of the Obama-era deal. Rich argued that the practical effect is a significant but temporary windfall for Tehran, with potential benefits to Iran’s economy and its ability to sustain groups like Hezbollah, while also creating legal and compliance risks for buyers and banks given the continued designation of the IRGC as a terrorist organization. The discussion ended with a broader reflection on Trump’s “dollar diplomacy” approach and how economic leverage is being used to shape foreign policy in the Middle East.

On this episode of Reaganism, Reagan Institute Director Roger Zakheim sits down with Fred Ryan, Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Director of the Center for Civility and Democracy at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute to discuss the Center's newly released "Civility Handbook." The conversation highlights the challenges of civility in the United States, emphasizing the need for respectful discourse across political divides. Fred shares insights on how the Civility Handbook aims to foster unity by providing practical tools for civil engagement in various settings, including social media. The discussion also touches on historical examples of bipartisan cooperation, reflecting on President Reagan's legacy of finding common ground. The Civility Handbook is available for free to encourage widespread adoption of these principles.

On this episode of Reaganism, Reagan Institute Director Roger Zakheim sits down with Matthew Waxman of Columbia University Law School to discuss the complexities of war powers in the United States, focusing on the president's authority to use military force and the implications of the War Powers Resolution. The dialogue explores historical and contemporary issues, including the constitutional powers of Congress and the president, the impact of military operations in Iran, and the political dynamics influencing these decisions. Matthew emphasizes the importance of political checks over strictly binding legal rules, while Roger highlights the strategic value of congressional authorizations for military force.