Part two of Paralegal’s Memo explains why inventors use the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) after a US filing to preserve priority, buy time, and gather early patentability intelligence before choosing countries for national filings.

The episode makes one thing clear: the PCT is a procedure, not a patent.

It breaks down 10 operational pressure points—fragile priority claims, the International Search Report and Written Opinion (with 2026 rule changes and the coordination-heavy work paralegals actually carry.

Let's Connect:

LinkedIn

X.com

YouTube

Subscribe to Paralegal's Memo on LinkedIn

Don’t forget to subscribe to the print version of Paralegal’s Memo on LinkedIn — you’ll find it at bit.ly/paralegal101.

Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and nothing should be construed as legal advice. That’s why you must always consult a qualified attorney.

In this part 1 of 2 examination of the patent process, learn why bringing your idea to market is more complex than many inventors and founders expect, involving searches, disclosures, signatures, deadlines, and data checks before a filing ever reaches the USPTO or international systems. Winn outlines the paralegal’s operational role in gathering inventor materials, prior art and timelines, entity and ownership details, then coordinating forms, drawings, vendor names, priority claims, and—when using the PCT—translations, foreign agents, 30-month deadlines, and country-specific requirements.

Let's Connect:

LinkedIn

X.com

YouTube

Subscribe to Paralegal's Memo on LinkedIn

Don’t forget to subscribe to the print version of Paralegal’s Memo on LinkedIn — you’ll find it at bit.ly/paralegal101.

Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and nothing should be construed as legal advice. That’s why you must always consult a qualified attorney.

Episode 14 of Paralegal’s Memo with Winn Trivette II breaks down how recent trade secret and pharma “skinny label” decisions are reshaping 2026 IP strategy for paralegals and junior practitioners. It explains how the Defend Trade Secrets Act can extend across borders (highlighting Insulate v. EOFlow), notes major damages risk in cases like Zest Labs v. Walmart and ZN0 v. Boeing, and shows how non-traditional assets and looser pre-discovery identification rules can broaden what may qualify as a trade secret (PleaserDAO v. Rakel and Quintara Biosciences).

Let's Connect:

LinkedIn

X.com

YouTube

Subscribe to Paralegal's Memo on LinkedIn

Don’t forget to subscribe to the print version of Paralegal’s Memo on LinkedIn — you’ll find it at bit.ly/paralegal101.

Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and nothing should be construed as legal advice. That’s why you must always consult a qualified attorney.