Nerdology: Implicit vs Explicit at Pangborn 2025
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Nerdology: Implicit vs Explicit at Pangborn 2025
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
In this special episode, I share a recording of the talk I gave with Richard Popper and Rachel Czapla at Pangborn 2025: "Unpacking Consumer Perceptions: Do Implicit and Explicit Measures Tell the Same Story?"
We dive into the results of a collaborative study using lip products (matte, gloss, balm) to compare three consumer research methods—CATA, scaled ratings, and a commercially friendly implicit go/no-go test (with our partners at RIWI). Our goal? To see if implicit methods truly reveal a different layer of truth in how consumers associate emotional, functional, and descriptive product attributes.
🧠 Key takeaways:
Explicit methods (CATA, ratings) tend to be more differentiating across products.
Implicit methods may reveal deeper, fast-twitch associations that reflect what “feels right” at a gut level.
Emotional adjectives weren’t necessarily stronger in implicit responses, challenging common assumptions.
These methods aren’t redundant—they reveal different cognitive processes (System 1 vs. System 2).
We close by discussing how these layered insights can be used in product development, positioning, and go/no-go decisions.