Mindframe(s) cover art

Mindframe(s)

Mindframe(s)

By: Dave Canfield and Michael Cockerill
Listen for free

About this listen

Each week Dave and Michael talk about film and where it fits in the larger social story. Art
Episodes
  • Episode 110 - Send Help
    Feb 11 2026

    Episode 110 — Send Help

    Film Credits

    Title: Send Help
    Director: Sam Raimi
    Starring: Rachel McAdams, Dylan O'Brien, Dennis Haysbert, Chris Pang
    Genre: Survival Thriller / Dark Comedy / Psychological Horror

    Episode Summary

    In this episode, Michael and David examine Sam Raimi's Send Help, a survival thriller about two corporate survivors stranded on a deserted island after a plane crash. What begins as a struggle for survival turns into a psychological battle for power, identity, and control. The discussion focuses heavily on Linda's transformation — whether the island reveals her true nature or corrupts her — and what the film suggests about power, resentment, and human nature.

    Three-Sentence Thematic Core

    Send Help explores what happens when social hierarchies collapse and survival becomes the only currency. The film questions whether power corrupts or merely reveals what was already present within a person. Linda's journey suggests a darker possibility: that the oppressed may replicate the very systems that once diminished them.

    Main Discussion Topic 1 — Linda's Transformation
    • Starts as overlooked, competent, underappreciated worker

    • Gains survival power → shifts into control and manipulation

    • Film asks: Was this always Linda, or did the island create her?

    Topic 2 — Power and Reversal
    • Corporate hierarchy collapses on the island

    • Linda becomes capable / Bradley becomes helpless

    • Echoes Triangle of Sadness: oppressed gaining power

    Topic 3 — Cynicism vs Revelation
    • Linda mirrors the cruelty she once suffered

    • The film may betray the "underdog triumph" trope

    • Ending suggests survival ≠ moral growth

    Topic 4 — Raimi Style and Tone
    • Mix of dark humor, physical horror, and thriller tension

    • Use of Raimi-cam and kinetic physicality

    • Balance between comedy, brutality, and psychological tension

    Topic 5 — Thin Plot, Strong Character Core
    • Narrative is minimal: two people, one island, shifting dominance

    • Rachel McAdams' performance carries emotional and thematic weight

    • Film remains engaging through physical tension and character conflict

    Episode Ratings

    David: 4 / 5
    Michael: 3 / 5

    Strengths:

    • Performance (McAdams)

    • Physical humor and tension

    • Raimi stylistic energy

    Weaknesses:

    • Thin premise

    • Murky ending

    • Uneven CGI realism

    Closing / Contact

    Mindframes Film Podcast
    mindframesfilm.com
    Now Playing Network
    Facebook
    info@mindframesfilm.com

    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 17 mins
  • Episode 109: 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
    Jan 23 2026

    28 Years Later: The Bone Temple (2026)

    Episode Summary:
    In this episode, Michael and Dave dissect 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, the most visually ambitious and thematically rich installment in the iconic 28 Days Later franchise. They explore the film's eerie cult narrative, psychological undercurrents, and the shifting horror dynamics that turn humans into the real monsters. With Nia DaCosta in the director's chair and Alex Garland returning as writer, the film blends horror, satire, and surprising moments of hope. A rich conversation for fans of speculative horror and social allegory.

    🎬 Cast & Crew Details – Who Made This Film and Why It Matters
    • Director: Nia DaCosta (Candyman, The Marvels, Little Woods)

    • Writer: Alex Garland (Ex Machina, Annihilation, Men, 28 Days Later)

    • Cinematographer: Sean Bobbitt (12 Years a Slave, Widows, Hunger)

    • Key Cast:

      • Ralph Fiennes as Dr. Ian Kelson – a monument builder and reluctant scientist

      • Alfie Williams as Spike – a returning survivor struggling with identity

      • Jack O'Connell as Jimmy Crystal – the chilling, charismatic cult leader

      • Chai Lewis-Perry as Samson – a towering infected in the midst of transformation

    ⏱️ Timestamps & Topics – Your Guide Through the Conversation TimeTopic00:00Opening Banter & Setting the Stage for Bone Temple00:41Introducing the Film – Context Within the Franchise01:19Directorial Approach: Nia DaCosta's Vision & Filmography02:24Comparing to 2025's 28 Years Later – Evolution or Echo?04:18Characters Returning & The Cult of the Jimmies Introduced07:34Revisiting the Franchise's Viral Origins & Setting10:01Plot Overview: Bone Temples, Cults, and Scientific Obsession10:44Cinematography Upgrades & Visual Tone Shifts13:26Danny Boyle's Influence & Where DaCosta Departs15:38Narrative Tightness vs. Thematic Breadth16:23Box Office Woes & The "January Dump" Conspiracy17:35Jimmy Crystal as a Breakout Villain18:18Spoiler-Free Reviews: Performances, Style, and Reception21:46Ralph Fiennes' Complex Turn as Dr. Kelson23:32Missteps in Marketing & Missed Opportunities26:20Themes vs. Advertising: What the Film Really Offers27:26Final Thoughts and Personal Ratings ⚠️ Spoiler Discussion Highlights – Deeper Themes, Arcs, and Revelations
    • The Jimmies as Symbol & Horror:
      The gang discusses how the Jimmies reflect societal decay, inspired by the real-life figure of Jimmy Savile. Their cultish behavior and unflinching cruelty mirror deeper fears about manipulation, lost innocence, and the rot at the core of community leadership.

    • Samson's Redemption Arc:
      A standout element of the film, Samson's transformation from infected monster to near-human symbolizes the potential for recovery even in corrupted bodies and minds. His scenes with Dr. Kelson evoke tenderness, contrast with the Jimmies' savagery, and challenge the notion of what makes someone "monstrous."

    • Human Evil vs. Infected Violence:
      The conversation explores how the infected, though dangerous, follow instinct—while the Jimmies choose cruelty. This blurs the line between traditional "monster" narratives and moral horror, echoing themes from Lord of the Flies and The Road.

    • Visual Juxtaposition of Horror and Beauty:
      Bone temples, lush landscapes, and surreal moments (like cloud-gazing while high) create a strange harmony. These sequences ask whether beauty can exist in a world of collapse and whether healing is possible amid trauma.

    • Cultural Legacy & Genre Evolution:
      Dave and Michael reflect on how the 28 franchise redefined the zombie genre, and how Bone Temple may mark a new phase—one that values emotional depth and psychological horror as much as jump scares.

    Mentioned in this Episode:

    • Films: Candyman (2021), Widows, Red Dragon, Gangs of London, Deluge (1933)

    • Cultural Figures: Jimmy Savile, Mr. Rogers

    • Literary/Genre References: Lord of the Flies, The Walking Dead, Mad Max, Godzilla

    Connect with Us:
    Website: https://mindframesfilm.com

    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 13 mins
  • Episode 108- What can we expect for 2026?
    Jan 19 2026
    Show Notes Film / Topic
    • Title: Looking to 2026: The Future of Cinema

    • Focus: Industry trends, cultural anxieties, and the most anticipated films of 2026

    • IMDb: N/A (discussion episode)

    Episode Summary

    In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and David look ahead to 2026 and ask a deceptively simple question: what kind of year will it be for movies? Coming off what they consider a creatively rich—but commercially uneven—2025, the conversation explores the tension between artistic vitality and economic uncertainty. From box office struggles and bloated marketing budgets to shifting audience habits and global cinema's rising influence, the hosts balance cautious concern with genuine excitement for what's coming next.

    Themes & Discussion

    Theme 1 – Cinema Thriving Creatively, Struggling Economically
    While 2025 delivered exceptional films and performances, many acclaimed movies failed to connect with large audiences. The episode interrogates whether this gap reflects streaming habits, rising costs, marketing excess, or deeper cultural fatigue with the theatrical model.

    Theme 2 – Event Movies vs. Personal Cinema
    The hosts contrast massive IP-driven releases (Avengers: Doomsday, Dune: Part Three, Toy Story 5) with filmmaker-driven projects from auteurs like Nolan, Villeneuve, Gerwig, Eggers, Spielberg, and Iñárritu—questioning whether spectacle alone can sustain moviegoing culture.

    Theme 3 – Hope Through Global & Generational Shifts
    Despite storm clouds, there are signs of renewal: Gen Z showing renewed interest in theaters, international films breaking through, and genre cinema thriving on modest budgets. The episode argues that cinema isn't dying—it's recalibrating.

    Timestamps TimeTopic00:00Intro & framing the question of 202605:30Why 2025 was a great creative year12:00Box office disappointments & marketing excess22:00Streaming, audience fatigue, and cultural shifts34:00Big tentpoles vs. auteur-driven films47:00Superhero fatigue & the future of franchises58:00Dune, Nolan, Spielberg, and prestige cinema01:12:00Horror, genre films, and low-budget success stories01:25:00Why there's still reason to be hopeful01:32:00Final thoughts on where cinema is heading Hosts
    • Michael Cockerill

    • David Canfield

    Contact & Links
    • 🌐 https://mindframesfilm.com

    • 📘 Facebook: Mindframes Film

    • 🎧 Now Playing Network

    • ✉️ info@mindframesfilm.com

    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 32 mins
No reviews yet