Andrew Miles Davis covers one of the most news-heavy weeks of the year, opening with Anthropic releasing Fable Five, the first public model from its new Mythos class, the same family as the model considered too dangerous to release publicly earlier this year. He then covers a developing AI price war as Google drops its cheapest Gemini plan to five dollars a month and OpenAI signals it is considering significant price reductions in response. Other major stories include ChatGPT integrating directly with Gmail and Outlook so users can draft and send emails without leaving the platform, Apple overhauling Siri into a full conversational AI at its WWDC conference, Google admitting in court that music uploaded to YouTube can be used to train its Lyra music model without paying artists, the EU ordering Meta to open WhatsApp to rival AI platforms, China forcing Meta to unwind its two billion dollar Manus acquisition, and MidJourney sending out invites for a mystery hardware launch with no details attached. Subscribe to In AI Nutshell for the AI news that matters to marketers, every Friday in ten minutes.

Andrew Miles Davis answers three questions from recent training sessions, starting with whether you should default to asking ChatGPT what to do in most situations and why he personally still starts with YouTube for tutorials before reaching for a large language model. He then gives his most underrated tool pick for June 2026, Copilot, explaining a genuine change of opinion over three months of deeper use and why he now pays more for it than any other AI subscription, with a prediction that Microsoft is about to have a strong second half of the year. The episode closes with an honest explanation of why the Fortnightly Fix is on a summer break, what it would take to bring it back, and why YouTube and LinkedIn video are the current priority. Subscribe to In AI Nutshell for daily ten-minute episodes and FAQ answers from someone doing this work at the frontline of corporate AI training every day.

Andrew Miles Davis delivers the second instalment of his series on why the golden era of AI is coming to an end, this time focusing on regulation, or more precisely, the current absence of it. He argues that the lack of oversight, while genuinely dangerous in some contexts, is also one of the defining features of the current window of opportunity, because once a regulatory body forms, whether that is governments, tech companies, or large corporations, it will be shaped by whoever holds the power, and that will change how the rest of us get to use these tools. He walks through the realistic candidates for who could regulate AI, explains why each option carries its own serious problems, and lands on the conclusion that the decision made in the next few years will not just determine what AI can do but who gets to decide what ordinary people can do with it. Subscribe to In AI Nutshell for daily ten-minute episodes that stay honest about where AI is actually heading.