The Anti-Silo: The C-Suite Accountability Crisis Episode 2 of the Anti-Silo Series cover art

The Anti-Silo: The C-Suite Accountability Crisis Episode 2 of the Anti-Silo Series

The Anti-Silo: The C-Suite Accountability Crisis Episode 2 of the Anti-Silo Series

Listen for free

View show details

LIMITED TIME OFFER | £0.99/mo for the first 3 months

Premium Plus auto-renews at £8.99/mo after 3 months. Terms apply.

About this listen

 Half of CEOs believe their jobs are on the line if AI doesn't pay off. Seventy-two percent now say they're the main decision maker on AI—double the number from last year. And yet: Gartner predicts over 40 percent of agentic AI projects will be cancelled by 2027.Not because the technology failed. Because accountability outpaced authority.Your C-suite is spending billions on AI while fighting over who owns the outcome—and while they fight, the clock is ticking.**The Scale of the Investment:**Boston Consulting Group released their annual AI survey on January 15th. The findings are staggering:- Companies plan to double their AI spending in 2026, accounting for 1.7 percent of revenues—more than twice the increase from 2025- Ninety-four percent of chief executives say they'll continue investing in AI at current or higher levels even if the investments don't pay off in the next year- Ninety percent of CEOs believe AI agents will produce measurable returns this year- CEOs are committing 30 percent of their organization's AI investment to agentic AI alone**The Confidence Gap:**CEO confidence in AI is significantly higher in the East than in the West:- India and Greater China: 75% of CEOs confident AI will deliver ROI- Europe: 61%- United States: 52%- United Kingdom: 44%Why the gap? BCG's analysis is revealing: "A larger share of Western CEOs say their organizations are investing in AI to avoid falling behind or because they feel pressure."Western executives are investing out of fear—fear of competitive irrelevance—not conviction. They're spending billions because they're terrified of being left behind, not because they have a clear strategy for value creation.IBM's 2025 CEO Study confirmed this pattern: 64 percent of CEOs acknowledge that the risk of falling behind drives them to invest in technologies before they have a clear understanding of the value those technologies bring.[CLIP] "That's not strategy. That's panic buying at enterprise scale."**The C-Suite Accountability Gap:**The farther you get from the corner office, the less confident executives become. BCG found that confidence in AI's eventual payoff drops from 62 percent among CEOs to just 48 percent among non-tech executives outside the C-suite.The CEO sees transformation. Everyone else sees uncertainty.This creates a dangerous dynamic:- The CEO is championing AI initiatives that the rest of the leadership team doesn't believe in- The CFO is skeptical of the ROI- The CIO is worried about technical debt- The CISO is concerned about attack surfaces- The General Counsel is terrified of liabilityThe CEO interprets this skepticism as resistance to change. The other executives interpret the CEO's enthusiasm as reckless optimism. Nobody's wrong—but nobody's aligned.**Role-Specific Strategic Fears:****The CEO's Fear: Competitive Irrelevance**IMD's 2026 AI trends analysis warned: "Organizations that fail to reach AI-native operations by 2027 risk being structurally uncompetitive."That's the CEO's nightmare: not that AI fails, but that competitors succeed while you hesitate.**The CFO's Fear: Unquantifiable Risk**CFOs are trained to evaluate investments through traditional ROI models—payback periods, margin impact, net present value. But AI doesn't fit those models.BCG found that most AI projects need two to four years to demonstrate value. CFOs expect returns in under a year. That mismatch creates inevitable conflict.CFO Brew quoted a finance leader: "CFOs must take an active role in AI governance. Although most view it as a technology 'system,' the necessary controls extend far beyond IT and cannot be managed by the CIO alone."**The CIO's Fear: Accountability Without Authority**Information Week's 2026 CIO trends analysis: "Enterprises rushed AI adoption without establishing who owns what. The technology moved faster than governance frameworks, leaving CIOs responsible for outcomes they can't fully control."One CIO was blunt: "The CIO's job is to establish guardrails, to provide a framework—not to absorb the consequences of ungoverned decisions."If marketing deploys a rogue AI tool, that's not an IT failure. If the CEO mandates a use case that bypasses governance, that's not an IT failure. But when something goes wrong, the board looks at IT first.**The CISO's Fear: Invisible Attack Surface**Digital Trends published analysis on "AI agent sprawl"—the uncontrolled expansion of AI agents across an organization.Their comparison: This is the shadow IT problem of the 2010s, but with exponentially more risk. Marketing deploys customer service agents. Finance deploys automated reporting bots. HR tests recruiting assistants. Each deployment expands the attack surface without centralized visibility.**The General Counsel's Fear: Undefined Liability**Forrester predicts 60 percent of Fortune 100 companies will appoint a head of AI governance in 2026. That tells you how urgent the problem has become—and how absent the accountability structure has ...
No reviews yet