In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, Maeve Halligan is joined by Lord Hannan of Kingsclere, Director General of the IEA, and Robert Armstrong, Director of the Institute for Free Trade.

Economic Affairs is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

This week, the discussion opens with the US midterms, where the Democrats made historic gains, from newly redrawn seats in Texas to a Senate seat in Kansas. Was the result really about the war in Iran, as some in the administration have claimed, or, with 39 per cent of voters naming the economy as their top issue and 66 per cent saying tariffs have hurt the national economy, a rejection of protectionism and its costs? The conversation examines how a tariff policy meant to reshore industry, close the trade deficit and raise revenue has delivered none of these, and how rising input costs filtered from businesses to voters across the Midwest and the Deep South. They also ask whether Trump’s following was ever a true cult of personality, whether those who went along with his trade policy should face an electoral price, and whether the Republican Party can return to limited government or the Democrats will draw the wrong lessons from their win.The discussion then turns to the UK–EU summit on 20 November, where a draft deal to scrap post-Brexit checks on food exports would require Britain to follow EU sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) rules. Is the Government trading sovereignty for a smoother border, or taking on regulatory costs across the whole economy that far outweigh the savings at the border? The panel weighs up the youth experience scheme, the return to Erasmus and the question of who pays tuition fees for EU students, and asks why Britain appears to be accepting the EU’s demands without setting out its own.The discussion closes with Michel Barnier’s warnings against “cherry picking”, whether rejoining the EU is a realistic prospect, and whether keeping the question open is more about uniting left-of-centre voters than any concrete plan to go back in. The panel argues that the real risk is not rejoining but the damage done along the way, and the danger of reopening the culture war that followed the 2016 referendum.The Institute of Economic Affairs is a registered educational charity. It does not endorse or give support for any political party in the UK or elsewhere. Our mission is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems.The views represented here are those of the speakers alone, not those of the Institute, its Managing Trustees, Academic Advisory Council members or senior staff.Subscribe, like and share!

Thanks for reading Economic Affairs! This post is public so feel free to share it.

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, Maeve Halligan is joined by Lord Hannan, Director General, and Dr Valentin Boboc, Chief Economist at the IEA.

This week, the discussion opens with a closer look at Chancellor John Healey’s Budget: 98 small measures, each with little impact, paid for with more borrowing. Is the new £100 winter heating payment for households in council tax Bands A to D a sensible support, or a costly and untargeted handout? Why is the Government using more intervention to fix high energy costs it helped create? Drawing on Perón’s Argentina and Ceaușescu’s Romania, we ask whether Britain is becoming an electorate that rewards visible handouts even as they leave it poorer. Can it still change course, as the IEA’s Alternative Budget proposed, or will the markets force a correction?

The discussion then turns to the Budget’s new surcharge on rental income, and to tribunals that now decide the “market rent”. In one case, a landlord who tried to raise the rent by £50 a month was ordered to cut it to £200 below the original level. Alongside new powers to take over empty properties, does this mark a retreat from Britain’s long commitment to property rights and free contract? We also look at how minimum wage rises have pushed youth unemployment to its highest level since 2011.

The discussion closes with Dr Boboc’s prediction that this will be the largest tax-raising Budget in history, with frozen income tax thresholds alone bringing in over £30 billion this year.

The Institute of Economic Affairs is a registered educational charity. It does not endorse or give support for any political party in the UK or elsewhere. Our mission is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems.The views represented here are those of the speakers alone, not those of the Institute, its Managing Trustees, Academic Advisory Council members or senior staff.Subscribe, like and share!

In this Institute of Economic Affairs podcast, Lord Hannan is joined by Dr Christopher Snowdon, Head of Lifestyle Economics, and Dr Kristian Niemietz, Editorial Director at the IEA.

This week, the discussion opens with whether Britain should have built a sovereign wealth fund from North Sea oil revenue, as Chancellor John Healey has suggested, pointing to Norway as the model we failed to follow. Is that comparison fair, or was Britain’s falling debt-to-GDP ratio in the 1980s itself a form of saving, just one that never got dressed up as a national fund? With the national debt now around £3 trillion, the fourth-largest in the world in absolute terms, how far could the IEA’s own Alternative Budget, built on a welfare freeze and a shift from income and savings taxes to consumption taxes, actually take us back toward surplus? And with the Budget approaching, will the Chancellor deliver meaningful reform, or a string of small, politically-driven announcements that change little?

The discussion then turns to France, where the panel debates whether the riots reflect a genuine fiscal crisis, a deficit above 5% of GDP and rising borrowing costs, built on decades of unaffordable pension and welfare spending, and whether Britain’s own creeping youth unemployment and social tensions put it on a similar trajectory. They also examine how far radicalisation and alienation in Britain stem from schools and the wider culture rather than immigration itself.

The discussion closes with Dr Snowdon’s regular nanny state story: a Manchester rent tribunal that didn’t just block a landlord’s modest, inflation-linked rent increase but ordered the rent reduced below its original level, an early example, the panel argues, of the unintended consequences of the Renters’ Rights Act. They end by invoking Bastiat’s distinction between the seen and unseen consequences of policy.

The Institute of Economic Affairs is a registered educational charity. It does not endorse or give support for any political party in the UK or elsewhere. Our mission is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems.

The views represented here are those of the speakers alone, not those of the Institute, its Managing Trustees, Academic Advisory Council members or senior staff.

Subscribe, like and share!

Don’t forget to subscribe to our Substack page, Economic Affairs: https://economicaffairs.co.uk/

Thanks for reading Economic Affairs! This post is public so feel free to share it.