In this episode of Hypertrophy Past & Present, Jake and Chris analyse one of Dorian Yates’ early pre-Olympia training programs, breaking down the structure of his torso-limbs split and the intuitive exercise sequencing.

From there, the conversation expands into a deeper discussion on exercise selection within a workout, why multiple exercises for the same muscle in a single session can produce a superior stimulus to rotating single exercises across sessions, and how this ties into neuromechanical matching and motor unit recruitment. The episode finishes with Chris addressing common criticisms of neuromechanical matching, explaining why alternative theories fail to explain motor control, efficiency-driven muscle recruitment, and sarcomere adaptation during strength training.

Key topics include:

• Dorian Yates’ early torso-limbs program
• Why single-joint “finisher” exercises maintain recruitment levels better than extra sets
• Practical improvements to Dorian’s plan using modern biomechanics
• The physiological problem with ABC exercise splits for hypertrophy
• How to structure multi-exercise workouts without increasing gym time
• Neuromechanical matching explained simply
• Why leverage must govern muscle recruitment
• Why active length-tension theories fail as motor control models

In this episode of Hypertrophy Past & Present, Jake and Chris break down the resurgence of “advanced” training techniques like clusters, supersets, giant sets, pre-exhaust, drop sets, and rest-pause. Using an early Chuck Sipes “heavy-light” split as an example of early bodybuilding plans that incorporated some advanced methods, the conversation then explains why most of these methods are at best time-saving rather than stimulus enhancing.

The episode finishes with Jake and Chris discussing a “physiological drop set” concept, which may increase recruitment levels without suffering from the same fatigue problems as other advanced methods.

Key topics include:
-Chuck Sipes’ early “heavy-light” superset program
-Why most supersets (agonist or antagonist) reduce stimulus rather than increase it
-Why pre-exhaustion methods don't work
-Why classic drop sets tend to be the worst “advanced technique”
-Rest-pause vs clusters
-A “physiological drop set” idea

In this episode of Hypertrophy Past & Present, Jake and Chris analyse a Golden Era training plan attributed to Larry Scott and Vince Gironda, using it as a lens to explore how hypertrophy programming evolved after the introduction of anabolic drugs. From there, the conversation pivots into a deeper examination of modern debates around exercise selection, “redundant” movements, single vs multi joint training, and the current discussions around form. Chris introduces voluntary activation deficits as the unifying physiological principle.

Key topics include:

• Larry Scott’s Golden Era full-body routine
• The limits of motor unit recruitment and voluntary activation deficits
• "Redundant" exercises
• Why more total muscle mass in an exercise reduces local recruitment
• The form debate and how excessive technique focus can impair hypertrophy outcomes