Ep 103 - The UN’s Two Faces: Why Accepting One Resolution and Rejecting Another Isn’t Hypocrisy
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
About this listen
Here’s a comment I keep seeing: “Jews only like the UN when it suits them. You accepted the 1947 partition plan but reject everything else the UN does. Hypocrites.”
And here’s my response: You’re confusing two completely different things.
The UN recommending a partition in 1947 and the UN institutionalizing hereditary refugee status through UNRWA for 75 years are not the same policy. Not the same context. Not the same organization, really.
Accepting one UN proposal while criticizing another isn’t hypocrisy. It’s evaluating each on its merits.
So today, let’s talk about the UN’s two faces. How one resolution tried to solve a problem, and how another made sure that problem never gets solved.
#JewishPodcast #MiddleEast #Israel #Palestine #Antisemitism #IsraelPalestineConflict #UN #UnitedNations #Hypocricy #JewishState #PalestinianRejectionism #ArabRejectionism
00:00 - Intro
01:05 - 1947: The Partition Plan
02:55 - 1949: UNRWA Is Born
05:00 - Why UNRWA Is Different
06:09 - Two Completely Different Things
06:49 - The Hypocrisy Accusation
08:33 - Evaluating on Merits
09:36 - The Double Standard
11:07 - What UNRWA Actually Does
12:06 - The Real Hypocrisy
12:54 - Why This Matters
14:08 - Final Thought