In this audio analysis, we explore the controversial strategic framework of Eldridge Colby, an architect of Project 2025 and the grandson of former CIA Director William Colby. We examine how the “Phoenix Program” logic of the Vietnam era—which reduced human life to statistical metrics—has evolved into a modern form of “moral triage”.

📖 Full article:

🎥 Video overview:

📬 Subscribe on Substack:

The discussion breaks down the 28-point Ukraine framework, a plan that seeks to pressure Kyiv into concessions and reallocate American power under the guise of “strategic minimalism”. By treating war as a spreadsheet problem and allies as “cost centers,” this strategy ignores the historical warnings of 1938 Britain and pre-2022 Ukraine, where ambiguity and retreat only served to accelerate aggression. Join us as we analyze why this “generational distillation” of power, which views deterrence as transactional rather than predictable, may lead to managed instability and more global conflict, not less.

Join us for a detailed audio analysis of the latest People’s Daily Brief. In this episode, we break down President Trump’s high-visibility address at Davos, where he navigated the strategic and economic arguments for U.S. involvement in Greenland while explicitly rejecting military coercion.

📖 Full article:

🎥 Video overview:

📬 Subscribe on Substack:

We examine the concrete institutional consequences of recent policy shifts, including the European Parliament’s decision to pause trade negotiations and the market response to the suspension of threatened tariffs. The analysis also covers rising domestic friction, focusing on federal-local immigration enforcement disputes and litigation surrounding federal public health guidance.

Finally, we explore our predictive scenarios for U.S.-EU relations and the “moderate” stress currently facing the constitutional allocation of powers. Listen in to understand how these developments test the boundaries of executive authority and the enduring “ambition counteracting ambition” of the American governing system.

People-powered, AI-Generated

AI-assisted draft: Google NotebookLM

Edited and curated by: Guy Wolf

*Disclaimer: AI has been known to malfunction “hallucinate” therefore, a human-in-the-middle approach has been used to provide the best quality, most accurate apolitical research on this topic

Thanks for reading Educate the Planet! Subscribe now!

Join the conversation with fellow Planetary Protectors on:

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@educatetheplanet

Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/educatetheplanet.bsky.social

TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@educatetheplanet

Proudly Show your Support By Wearing Educate The Planet Merch: https://educatetheplanet-shop.fourthwall.com/

Explore our free global civic education resources at https://github.com/freeciviceducation.

Subscribe, Like, Share, and Restack to participate in the conversation, receive new posts and support our mission to Educate The Planet!

This audio analysis explores the January 21, 2026, People’s Daily Brief, focusing on the unprecedented federal–state standoff currently unfolding in Minnesota. We examine the U.S. Department of Justice’s issuance of grand jury subpoenas to Governor Tim Walz, Attorney General Keith Ellison, and the mayors of Minneapolis and St. Paul. The discussion centers on whether public opposition by these officials constitutes obstruction of federal immigration enforcement or protected political dissent.

📖 Full article:

🎥 Video overview:

📬 Subscribe on Substack:

We further analyze reported aggressive conduct by federal agents, including allegations of ICE officers confronting off-duty local police, and the judicial decisions complicating congressional oversight of detention facilities. Drawing on the historical context of Donald J. Trump’s personalist leadership style and adversarial framing of institutions, this episode provides a high-confidence assessment of the persistent friction between executive assertions and constitutional procedural constraints. Finally, we weigh predictive hypotheses regarding whether these legal confrontations will prompt higher court clarifications on federal authority or lead to negotiated safeguards for civil rights.