Dog Science Digest Podcast cover art

Dog Science Digest Podcast

Dog Science Digest Podcast

By: Elina Halonen
Listen for free

LIMITED TIME OFFER | £0.99/mo for the first 3 months

Premium Plus auto-renews at £8.99/mo after 3 months. Terms apply.

About this listen

 Accessible podcast-style summaries of research on dogs

dogsciencedigest.substack.comElina Halonen Science Social Sciences
Episodes
  • The Invention of the Modern Dog

    The Invention of the Modern Dog
    Apr 18 2025
    In this episode, we trace the origins of the modern pedigree dog, exploring how today’s breeds were shaped not just by biology, but by social class, fashion, blood sports, and emerging Victorian ideas about heredity. Drawing on Michael Brandow’s A Matter of Breeding and Michael Worboys’ historical analysis of breed invention in Britain, we examine how breeding moved from practical function to aesthetic ideal, and how the development of dog shows and breed clubs entrenched narrow definitions of what a dog should be. From dished bulldog faces to designer Labs, this episode explores the cost of perfection.Key topics* From function to form: how working dogs became breed stereotypes* Dog shows, conformation, and the creation of the breed standard* Victorian science, social class, and early genetics* Fashion, celebrity, and cultural trends in breed popularity* The health and welfare consequences of selective breeding* The rise of the commercial dog industryLong-read articleBook overviewThis episode draws on two complementary sources:* Michael Brandow’s A Matter of Breeding is a polemical critique of the modern dog fancy, blending personal narrative with social history. * Michael Worboys’ essay The Invention of the Modern Dog Breed and Blood in Victorian Britain offers a more academic analysis of how 19th-century British culture—and emerging ideas of heredity and animal classification—produced the concept of the pedigree breed.Together, they tell a story of transformation: from dogs as functional animals with diverse forms and roles, to dogs as aesthetic commodities, shaped to meet the social, scientific, and cultural ideals of the humans who breed, own, and display them.From function to fashion: the artificiality of breedBrandow’s critique opens with Bob, a bulldog whose anatomy illustrates how far selective breeding has strayed from canine function. His “super-sized skull,” “collapsed snout,” and immobile gait embody the disconnection between what dogs are shaped to look like and what they can actually do. This isn’t evolutionary adaptation—it’s human projection, exaggerated over generations.Breeds like the Jack Russell, Basenji, and Shiba Inu rise and fall in popularity not due to function, but because they match a cultural moment. Sleek and minimal, exotic and primitive, youthful and cheeky—dogs become lifestyle symbols, their popularity driven by advertising campaigns and celebrity endorsements rather than suitability to task or temperament.Inventing breeds: how Victorian Britain redefined the dogWorboys describes how, prior to the 1860s, dogs were classified loosely as “types,” “sorts,” or “varieties.” A retriever was something that retrieved. A spaniel was named for its region or behaviour. Variation within these groups was accepted. Breed, in the modern sense—fixed, repeatable, with a written standard—didn’t yet exist.That changed with the rise of livestock breeding models, applied first to cattle and sheep, and then to dogs. Breed became a system for controlling bloodlines. Stud books, conformation shows, and detailed descriptions of the “ideal dog” emerged. What mattered now was not what a dog could do, but how closely it matched the standard.Dog shows and the pursuit of perfectionThe Bulldog Club (founded 1875) exemplified this shift. It defined not just what a bulldog should look like, but how it must look—"broken noses," "dished faces," "broken backs." These standards were enforced through the show ring, with judges trained to reward conformity. Some features were so extreme that puppies underwent painful modifications to better match the standard.John Henry Walsh (“Stonehenge”) hoped to unify breed definitions nationally through his publications. His goal was consistency. But critics feared that rigid definitions would prioritise appearance over health, leading to exaggerated, fragile animals—an early warning still relevant today.Class, fashion, and the shaping of tasteThe Victorian elite used dogs as markers of social distinction. Breed ownership signalled wealth, status, and masculinity. The English bulldog became a mascot for elite institutions. The Labrador retriever became synonymous with landed gentry and private estates.The Duke of Windsor’s fondness for yellow Labs helped make the colour fashionable. In modern advertising, breed choice becomes an extension of identity—urban chic, rugged independence, old-money tradition. As Brandow notes, “tastes in dogs are in a constant state of flux.” But that flux reflects the culture, not the dog.Victorian science and breeding ideologyWorboys highlights the influence of scientific and pseudo-scientific ideas on dog breeding. Craniology linked skull shape to temperament. Telegony—the idea that a female dog’s first mate permanently influenced all future offspring—shaped mating decisions and female dog value. Even attempts at “rational breeding,” like Everett Millais’s ...
    Show More Show Less
    18 mins
  • The Value of Sniffing

    The Value of Sniffing
    Apr 15 2025
    In this episode, we explore what sniffing really means for dogs—beyond enrichment or obedience practice. Drawing on the scoping review The Value of Sniffing (Cameron et al., 2023), we examine the behavioural and physiological evidence that scent-based activities aren’t just enjoyable for dogs—they’re fundamental to their wellbeing. From scent walks to nosework training, the paper reviews how olfactory engagement can reduce stress, support agency, and build emotional resilience.Key topics* What counts as a scent activity?* Links between sniffing, wellbeing, and agency* Scent work as both enrichment and intervention* Physiological and behavioural outcomes* Practical applications for trainers and ownersLong-read articleStudy overviewCameron et al. (2023) conducted a scoping review to consolidate current research on the value of scent-based activities for dogs. Rather than focusing on scent detection or working dog performance, the review examined how everyday olfactory activities influence welfare, agency, and behaviour. The authors found consistent evidence that allowing dogs to engage their nose—through tracking, scavenging, or enrichment tasks—can reduce physiological stress markers, encourage exploratory behaviour, and support dogs’ ability to self-regulate.Crucially, the review framed sniffing not just as a tool for obedience or stimulation, but as a behavioural need. Echoing trends in animal welfare and human psychology, the paper highlighted how olfactory engagement contributes to autonomy, resilience, and emotional stability.Thematic analysisDefining scent activities: from decompression walks to structured trackingThe review distinguished between passive and active scent activities. Passive options include letting dogs sniff on walks or scatter-feeding in the garden. Active forms include structured nosework classes, mantrailing, or scent games. The key is that these activities allow dogs to use their noses voluntarily and without time pressure—supporting intrinsic motivation.Importantly, the review noted that even low-effort scent activities showed measurable benefits, suggesting that you don’t need to train a detection dog to support wellbeing.Stress and scent: sniffing as a behavioural bufferSeveral studies reviewed by Cameron et al. showed that dogs allowed to sniff more frequently had lower heart rates, more stable cortisol levels, and fewer signs of arousal or frustration. For example, one study found that dogs on “sniffari” walks had lower pulse rates than dogs walked on a strict heel. Another linked frequent sniffing with improved rest quality and reduced vocalisation in kennelled dogs.These outcomes point to sniffing as a regulatory behaviour—akin to fidgeting or daydreaming in humans—which helps modulate arousal and support calmness.Scent and agency: the right to choose where your nose goesOne of the paper’s most interesting contributions was the connection between olfactory activities and behavioural agency. Dogs who were allowed to explore scent trails at their own pace showed more exploratory behaviour overall, suggesting that giving dogs control over sensory input can improve environmental engagement and emotional confidence.Agency isn’t just a feel-good concept—it’s a measurable factor in animal welfare. The authors argue that sniffing supports agency by giving dogs meaningful control over their time, movements, and attention.Structured scent work: resilience through olfactionThe review also explored the growing use of scent work in behaviour modification, particularly for dogs with anxiety or reactivity. While not a replacement for therapeutic protocols, scent games were found to improve dogs’ tolerance for challenging situations. For example, dogs exposed to scent training during a kennel stay were more relaxed during handling sessions and showed fewer stress-related behaviours.This suggests that olfactory enrichment may act as a form of psychological buffering, helping dogs build resilience and regulate emotional responses over time.Practical takeaways* Prioritise sniffing on walks: Let dogs explore at their own pace for at least part of the walk.* Use scatter feeding or scent puzzles: Especially valuable for kennelled, anxious, or under-stimulated dogs.* Integrate scent work into training plans: Not just for fun, but as a tool for emotional regulation.* Recognise olfaction as a core need: Denying scent opportunities may be as limiting as restricting movement or social contact.Further reading* Cameron, S., Redgate, S. E., & Zulch, H. (2023). The value of sniffing: A scoping review of scent activities for canines. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 261, 105820.* Horowitz, A. (2016). Being a Dog: Following the Dog Into a World of Smell.* Rooney, N. J., & Cowan, S. (2011). Training methods and owner-dog interactions: Links with dog behaviour and learning ability. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 132(3–4), 169–177. This is a public episode. If ...
    Show More Show Less
    15 mins
  • The Art of the Sniff

    The Art of the Sniff
    Apr 15 2025
    In this episode, we explore the science behind the sniff—what actually happens when dogs engage with scent. Drawing from recent research on canine olfactory physiology and neuroscience, we unpack how sniffing differs from passive smelling, how dogs adjust their sniffing patterns based on context, and what happens in their brain and body as they search, discriminate, and react to smells. We also explore lateralisation, heart rate dynamics, and the cognitive and emotional consequences of the canine nose at work.Key topics* Sniffing as a cognitive and physiological process* Neural pathways linking olfaction to emotion* Lateralised nostril use and hemispheric processing* Cardiac and cortical correlates of high-frequency sniffing* Differences between ground and air sniffing* The role of efficient sniffing in scent detection and learningLong-read articleStudy overviewThis episode draws on The Art of the Sniff, a synthesis of current literature on canine olfactory mechanisms, including sniffing patterns, olfactory neuroanatomy, physiological correlates of olfaction, and the emotional significance of scent. The reviewed material spans research on dogs and rats, highlighting shared mechanisms and species-specific nuances in how scent is processed, interpreted, and acted upon. The article situates sniffing not merely as a sensory act, but as a gateway into the dog’s cognitive and affective world.Sniffing is not just smelling: the anatomy of active olfactionDogs sniff at frequencies between 4–7 Hz—up to 200 times per minute. This rapid, sharp inhalation creates turbulence in the nasal cavity, enhancing the delivery of odour molecules to the olfactory epithelium (Berg et al., 2024). Approximately 12–13% of each breath is diverted via an upper flow path directly to the olfactory region, where molecules accumulate and are exposed for longer—crucial for signal detection.Unlike humans, dogs inhale from the front and exhale to the side, and each nostril samples air separately. This bilateral sampling enables precise localisation of odours in space, a critical function during tracking or detection tasks. Passive smelling, by contrast, is a lower-resolution, unconscious process that lacks the directional, cognitive engagement of sniffing.The sniffing brain: from olfactory bulb to emotion circuitsSniffing activates distinct areas of the dog’s brain compared to passive odour detection. Functional imaging studies show that the piriform cortex and medial/posterior orbitofrontal gyri are active during active sniffing—even when no odour is present. In contrast, passive smelling primarily engages lateral/anterior orbitofrontal areas, suggesting sniffing is not just a sensory act but a preparatory and attentional one.The olfactory bulb connects directly to emotional and memory-related areas including the amygdala, frontal cortex, and hippocampus. This olfactory–limbic connection explains why scent can trigger strong emotions or memories in dogs, and why familiar human scents activate the caudate nucleus, a reward-related region (Berns et al., 2015).High-frequency sniffing: what the heart and brain revealStudies in rats show that high-frequency (HF) sniffing—above 6 Hz—is not just linked to odour sampling but reflects a shift in overall arousal and motivational state. During HF sniffing, heart rate increases and the motor cortex shows elevated theta/delta ratios—typically associated with attentiveness and engagement. These physiological markers occur even when the animal is stationary, suggesting that sniffing, not movement, is driving the response.While direct canine equivalents are less studied, canine olfaction is similarly tied to heart rate and HRV (heart rate variability), particularly during emotionally charged or cognitively demanding tasks. This suggests that sniffing may serve as a marker for heightened internal engagement.The emotional nose: scent as feelingDogs process emotionally charged odours differently depending on context. They tend to initiate sniffing with the right nostril, particularly for novel or arousing scents. If the odour proves non-threatening or familiar, they may switch to the left nostril. This lateralised behaviour implies hemispheric specialisation in the processing of emotional valence: right hemisphere for vigilance and arousal, left for positive or familiar signals.Olfactory input doesn’t just inform behaviour—it modulates affect. Sniffing and scent work have been shown to increase optimistic judgement in dogs, likely through dopaminergic reward pathways. Human emotional odours also influence dogs: the scent of human fear produces longer sniff durations and more alert behaviour than happiness scents, suggesting interspecies chemosignalling plays a role in emotional contagion.Ground vs air sniffing: strategies and structureDogs shift between ground sniffing and air sniffing depending on the nature of the task. Ground sniffing involves following settled odour ...
    Show More Show Less
    34 mins
No reviews yet