Defamation vs. Disparagement Explained
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Defamation vs. Disparagement Explained
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
In this episode of OK at Work, Offit Kurman attorneys Sarah Sawyer and Russell Berger explain the difference between defamation and non-disparagement and why these terms often appear in business and employment agreements. They note that defamation is independently actionable without a contract and generally involves a false statement made to a third party that causes damage. Disparagement can be true or opinion-based but negative and is typically not actionable unless parties agree by contract not to disparage each other. They discuss how non-disparagement clauses, often paired with confidentiality provisions, are commonly used after disputes in employer-employee, partner, or business relationships to protect reputations and prevent harmful commentary.
00:00 Intro and Topic
01:04 Defamation Basics
01:52 Disparagement Explained
02:28 Why Contracts Include It
03:34 Finality and Confidentiality
04:32 Wrap Up and Sign Off