Episodes

  • Prof Responds: Harry Potter & the Unreachable Standard

    Prof Responds: Harry Potter & the Unreachable Standard
    Jun 24 2026
    This episode of Critical Magic Theory picks up where the last episode left off, this time handing the floor to the CMT community. Listeners push back, dig deeper, and refuse to agree — on whether Harry's flaws are his fault, on what standard we're even using to evaluate him, and on the question that generated the most heat: is he extraordinary? Four themes emerge from the conversation: Harry as a product of his environment, the impossible standard applied to a child, the tension between goodness as practice and goodness as grade, and the case, argued with a bevy of receipts, that Harry Potter is, actually, extraordinary. Prof weighs in throughout and closes without resolving the question. That's the point.
    Show More Show Less
    52 mins
  • Harry Potter: The Boy who Survived, not Lived

    Harry Potter: The Boy who Survived, not Lived
    Jun 17 2026
    Is Harry Potter a good person? A good friend? A victim? Extraordinary?

    We heard from over 600 listeners, and the results were more chaotic than you might expect. In this episode of Critical Magic Theory, Professor Julian Wamble digs into the survey data to explore what our answers to these four questions reveal not just about Harry, but about the standards we hold him to. From the Dursleys' cupboard to the horcrux hunt, we examine what Harry actually learned growing up and why so many of the behaviors we criticize in him trace directly back to Privet Drive.

    PRE-ORDER: Behind the Cloak: Race, Identity, and Harry Potter
    • Barnes & Noble: Behind the Cloak: Race, Identity and Harry Potter
    • Bookshop: Behind the Cloak: Race, Identity and Harry Potter
    • Amazon: Behind the Cloak: Race, Identity and Harry Potter
    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 20 mins
  • Prof Responds- Who is a Hero?

    Prof Responds- Who is a Hero?
    Jun 10 2026
    What does it mean to call someone a hero, and how much of what we believe about heroism in the Harry Potter series was shaped for us before we ever thought to question it?

    In this Prof Responds episode, Professor Julian Wamble sits with the community's response to the Heroes and Half-Bloods episode, working through three themes: the impossibility of a clean definition of heroism, the double standards of heroic accountability across age and blood status, and whether heroism freely chosen and heroism thrust upon someone are really the same thing.

    The reflection asks something harder: how much of our understanding of Harry Potter heroism is actually ours, and how much were we socialized into by the text itself?

    Harry Potter Survey
    Show More Show Less
    55 mins
  • Heroes & Halfbloods

    Heroes & Halfbloods
    Jun 3 2026
    What does it mean to be a hero in the wizarding world, and does being half-blood change the calculus? In this episode, Professor Julian Wamble examines the Battle of Hogwarts through the lens of half-blood identity, asking not just who fought but why, and what their presence tells us about heroism, selflessness, and the difference between doing something heroic and actually being a hero. From Dean Thomas showing up without a wand to Tonks and Lupin leaving a newborn at home, the half-blood characters at the Battle of Hogwarts offer the clearest window into what heroism actually requires and who among them truly earns the title.

    Harry Potter Survey
    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 8 mins
  • Prof Responds: Seamus Finnigan- The Boy Who trusted his Mom

    Prof Responds: Seamus Finnigan- The Boy Who trusted his Mom
    May 27 2026
    In this Prof Responds episode, Professor Julian Wamble returns to Seamus Finnigan to sit with what the Critical Magic Theory community had to say. Listeners dig into three themes: the machinery of Irish stereotyping in both the books and the films, and whether the cultural blind spots baked into Seamus's characterization were ever truly unconscious; Hogwarts as a British colonial institution and what it means that Irish magical families had no alternative but a school run by the British; and the question of whether Seamus Finnigan is a hero, and what our resistance to calling him one reveals about whose eyes we've spent seven books reading through. The episode closes with a reflection on children, adults, propaganda, and trust — and what the Harry Potter series quietly teaches us about which of those things we're supposed to place in which.

    Harry Potter Survey
    Show More Show Less
    56 mins
  • Seamus Finnigan & the Making of "Irish McIreland"

    Seamus Finnigan & the Making of "Irish McIreland"
    May 20 2026
    What does it mean that the number one word listeners used to describe Seamus Finnigan was Irish? In Critical Magic Theory history, no character has ever been described by their nationality before. That single data point opens an episode that goes far deeper than one minor Gryffindor. Professor Wamble moves through the Arithmancy questions, good person, good friend, good Gryffindor, good half-blood, hero, before landing on the episode's central argument: that JKR's construction of "Irish McIreland" is a case study in how white supremacy operates within whiteness itself, how stereotype substitutes for characterization, and why representation requires more than presence. Featuring listener voices throughout, this episode asks what Seamus Finnigan deserved versus what he got, and what the difference tells us about who gets to just be in the wizarding world.

    Harry Potter Survey
    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 13 mins
  • Prof Responds: D.A.D.A, Power, and the Politics of Fear

    Prof Responds: D.A.D.A, Power, and the Politics of Fear
    May 13 2026
    Professor Julian Wamble returns to the Defense Against the Dark Arts bonus episode with listener responses from Patreon, Discord, and Spotify. Three threads drive the conversation: whether Dumbledore ever actually tried to break the curse on the DADA position, whether Lucius Malfoy as Chair of Governors had reasons to keep it broken, and what magical education is failing to teach about consent, consequences, and the ethics of power. The reflection asks a bigger question: why don't we have a real-world equivalent of DADA? Because we don't need one. The conditioning DADA has to do explicitly in a classroom happens in our world through media, history, policing, and the composition of the spaces we grow up in. The fear arrives before school does. What school teaches, in the wizarding world and ours, isn't how to defend yourself. It's who the defenders are.

    Seamus Finnigan Survey
    Show More Show Less
    55 mins
  • Defense Against the What???

    Defense Against the What???
    May 6 2026
    In this episode on Hogwarts courses, Professor Julian Wamble takes on Defense Against the Dark Arts and finds more to critique than expected. The central argument: DADA was never really about defense. It only becomes urgent in reaction to crisis, and even then, it teaches fear rather than discernment. Every professor through Year 4 embodies the very darkness the class claims to oppose, from possession and fraud to stigma and deception, exposing what the institution refuses to name. Wamble pushes further, asking what "dark" actually means when love potions are legal, Obliviate is ministry policy, and Harry himself casts Cruciatus. The line between dark and light is not a wall. It is a mirror. Ultimately, Wamble argues that a true Defense Against the Dark Arts course would not just teach counter-curses. It would teach moral imagination: how to recognize harm, resist the seduction of necessity, and how to not become the monster.
    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 7 mins