Citizen One: Exploring Our Urban Future cover art

Citizen One: Exploring Our Urban Future

Citizen One: Exploring Our Urban Future

By: Douglas Stuart McDaniel
Listen for free

LIMITED TIME OFFER | £0.99/mo for the first 3 months

Premium Plus auto-renews at £8.99/mo after 3 months. Terms apply.

About this listen

 Welcome to Citizen One: Exploring Our Urban Future. I’m Douglas Stuart McDaniel—author, innovation veteran, and accidental urbanist—exploring the forces shaping the cities of tomorrow. It’s not just a conversation—it’s a call to action. Here, we challenge assumptions, explore bold ideas, and rethink what cities can be—both now and in the future.

multiversethinking.substack.comDouglas Stuart McDaniel Science
Episodes
  • Premium Pulp Fiction S1 E3: A Citizen One Literary Imprint

    Premium Pulp Fiction S1 E3: A Citizen One Literary Imprint
    Jan 16 2026
    Welcome back to Citizen One: Exploring Our Urban Future and—I am excited to say—Premium Pulp Fiction. I’m your host, Douglas Stuart McDaniel, and before we go any further, I want to pause for a moment.We’re recording this at the start of a new year, in a world that feels simultaneously exhausted and overheated. Wars that refuse resolution. Cities under pressure from climate, inequality, and political fracture. Technologies advancing faster than our capacity to govern them. Institutions losing credibility while still holding enormous power. For many people listening, this year didn’t begin with hope so much as vigilance.That context matters.Citizen One was never meant to be escapist. It exists because moments like this demand clearer thinking, longer memory, and a willingness to stay present inside complexity rather than retreat from it. The stories we explore here—about cities, systems, culture, and power—are not abstractions. They are the environments we’re already living in, whether we’ve named them yet or not.So if you’re listening from a place of uncertainty, fatigue, or quiet resolve, you’re not alone. This space is for people who are still paying attention, still asking better questions, and still trying to understand how the future is being shaped in real time—often without our consent, but never without consequence.With that in mind, let’s step into today’s episode.Before I begin, I also wanted to share some important context with you. Citizen One is much more than a podcast. It is an emerging media brand where we explore stories at the intersection of innovation, culture, memory, and the past, present and future of cities.But today, we’re stepping into a slightly different kind of narrative frontier. I want to take a moment to introduce Premium Pulp Fiction, our Citizen One literary imprint and publishing empire.This episode is also a crossover—one that connects what we do here at Citizen One with a parallel storytelling project rooted in the same curiosity about systems, human complexity, and consequence, but expressed through fiction.It’s called Premium Pulp — an independent traditional publishing imprint where quality, depth, and risk-bearing imagination come first.At its core, Premium Pulp Fiction publishes speculative fiction, noir-inflected narratives, historical fiction, and narrative nonfiction concerned with power, memory, technology, and the quieter mechanics of how societies endure, adapt, and fail over time.Beginning this year, we will be publishing a very small number of carefully selected titles, and unlike many modern indie or hybrid publishers, we fully finance standard book production. Our authors never pay for book production or global distribution; they also receive the resources to leverage an integrated marketing and publicity ecosystem built from a network of preferred, vetted, award-winning suppliers.Over the last 15–20 years, most small presses have been forced into one of three survival models:1. Author-funded or cost-sharing modelsThese include hybrid presses, “assisted publishing,” or thinly disguised vanity presses. Production costs are shifted to the author—sometimes partially, sometimes entirely—and the imprint’s role becomes administrative rather than editorial. Marketing support, when offered, is usually modular, outsourced, or pay-to-upgrade.2. Grant-subsidized or institutionally anchored pressesUniversity presses, arts-council-backed imprints, or nonprofit literary houses can sometimes fully fund authors, but they rely on external subsidy. Their marketing reach is often limited, conservative, or academically scoped, and publicity ecosystems are modest by design.3. Micro-indies operating on sweat equityThese presses finance production out of pocket, but at minimal levels—basic editing, templated design, limited print runs—and expect authors to self-market aggressively. Publicity ecosystems are informal at best and nonexistent at worst.What almost never exists anymore is a small, independent imprint that does all three of the following at once:* Fully finances production (developmental editing through distribution)* Retains editorial authority and risk (rather than transferring it to the author)* Provides an integrated marketing and publicity ecosystem rather than ad-hoc supportThat model used to be normal. It was called publishing.While publishers exist across a wide range of sizes and models, the largest U.S. trade houses—commonly referred to as the Big Five—retain the scale, capital, and specialized editorial, marketing, and publicity infrastructure required to support broad distribution and coordinated campaigns at volume. Most small and independent presses operate with significantly smaller budgets and far fewer specialized departments, and as a result, authors are often expected to source, coordinate, or directly manage much of their promotional and publicity work themselves.This context is what makes...
    Show More Show Less
    13 mins
  • Citizen One S2 E9: Taş Tepeler, 9000 BCE

    Citizen One S2 E9: Taş Tepeler, 9000 BCE
    Jan 16 2026
    Cities are a form civilization often takes. They were never its starting condition.Since my first travels to Türkiye several years ago—through Istanbul, İzmir, and Ephesus—and also across archaeological sites in Egypt, Jordan, Bahrain, Morocco, and Saudi Arabia, Göbekli Tepe has remained on my research radar**. Not as an archaeological revelation or a sudden conversion to deep prehistory, but because, as a narrative architect, I’m drawn to how settlement systems form—especially the ones hiding in plain sight.**Taş Tepeler has lingered in my mind in precisely this way, not as a city or urban form, but as a system of worldbuilding and story ecology that invites harder questions about how civilizations function beneath their visible forms: coordination, legitimacy, labor, belief, and power.The logic that structures human worlds long before they crystallize into cities.Taş Tepeler offers evidence of something more elusive and, in many ways, more instructive: civilization as coordinated life before urbanization. We don’t see clear evidence of dense settlement cores. No large concentration of permanent housing blocks. No streets, markets, or municipal hierarchy. None of the architectural signals we rely on to tell ourselves that “civilization has begun.”And yet the civic coordination is unmistakable. Across multiple sites, deliberately distributed across the landscape, we see coordination that exceeds kinship or coincidence. A shared symbolic grammar appears again and again, not as local improvisation but as something collectively maintained. Labor is organized at a scale that no single community could sustain alone. People gather repeatedly—on rhythms that imply scheduling, expectation, and return—rather than accident or crisis.Memory here is not stored in text or archive, but anchored in place. That anchoring is not passive. It is actively staged.There is so much exciting work going on now across the Taş Tepeler sites: archaelogical work, paleo-environmental research, cultural heritage management, and ethnoarchaeology. And recent excavations reveal narrative systems embedded directly into architecture: reliefs depicting sequences rather than symbols, animals and humans shown in motion and interaction, vessels and figurines designed to be handled, repositioned, and displayed. These are not static images. They appear to be prompts for retelling.Some installations appear deliberately constructed to accommodate small groups seated together, facing shared visual fields—spaces where stories could be enacted, repeated, and remembered through gesture and movement as much as through speech. If this is not theatre in the modern sense, it is unmistakably performative.In societies without writing, narrative is not entertainment. It is governance. Stories encode precedent, obligation, consequence, and identity. They allow rules to survive complexity without law codes, and memory to persist without archives.Taş Tepeler suggests that long before writing externalized memory onto clay or parchment, humans externalized it into space, sequence, and ritualized performance. Authority does not reside in an office or a law code; it operates across time and distance through participation, repetition, and shared obligation. Nowhere is this clearer than in the way these communities treated their own past.Structures were not simply abandoned when they fell out of use. They were deliberately backfilled—often with more labor than their original construction required—sealed with care, and preserved as memory rather than erased. Human remains were curated, repositioned, and integrated into walls and floors over generations. New structures were built alongside old ones, not on top of them, maintaining a legible landscape of accumulated history.This is not disposal. It is archiving—performed spatially rather than textually. The way human remains appear at Taş Tepeler adds another layer to this memory architecture. Rather than isolated grave fields, fragments of human bones and prepared crania recur in niches, built contexts, and fill deposits. This integration of the human body into the fabric of communal space is not random. It is part of the same durable system of place-based remembrance that we see in architecture, narrative imagery, and the sequencing of built enclosures — a set of conventions that carries memory across generations without text or archive.What emerges is an early form of memory architecture: a system in which collective history is embedded into the built environment itself, allowing authority, identity, and obligation to persist across centuries without documents, institutions, or states.Civilization here is not remembered. It is inhabited. These are not private acts or isolated rituals. They are public behaviors, negotiated in common, and sustained across generations.That is what makes them _civic_—even in the absence of streets, councils, or walls. Settlement is not the ...
    Show More Show Less
    36 mins
  • David Bowie, Prince, Timothy Leary, and an AI-Powered Race With Time

    David Bowie, Prince, Timothy Leary, and an AI-Powered Race With Time
    Dec 24 2025

    I recorded this episode on Christmas Eve, not out of allegiance to any particular religious institution, but because Christmas Eve still does something rare in the calendar.

    It creates a pause that doesn’t belong to any authority. It marks an ending without demanding resolution. It gives many of us permission to stop moving for a moment and ask where we actually are.

    This episode is about time — not as abstraction, not as philosophy, and not as technology — but as lived experience. Specifically, what has happened to our shared sense of time over the last decade, and why so many of us feel so displaced inside it.

    The story inside this episode begins in 2016.

    People remember 2016 as a particularly bad year, as if it announced itself. It didn’t. It arrived quietly and then began taking things away with unsettling regularity. Bowie. Prince. Cohen. Fisher. Cultural figures who felt less like celebrities and more like structural supports. By the end of that year, the calendar itself had become suspect. Loss no longer arrived with space around it. Events stacked. Grief turned ambient.

    In hindsight, that’s why 2016 feels strangely nostalgic now. It was the last time loss still arrived with punctuation. People mourned together. The calendar still felt like a shared object, something communal rather than mechanical.

    Everything after blurred.

    COVID flattened time completely. Days lost texture. Weeks collapsed. Months passed without landmarks. “COVID time” entered the language because nothing else could hold the disorientation. When lockdowns lifted, time didn’t recover — it accelerated. Entire years compressed. Memory misfiled whole seasons. The world resumed motion without recovering rhythm.

    AI followed close behind, not as spectacle or rupture, but as subtraction. Roles disappeared quietly. Skills aged overnight. Many people weren’t fired; they were simply no longer called. By the middle of the decade, millions were still standing where March 2020 had left them, while systems continued advancing without synchronization.

    By late 2025, another phrase began circulating, first as a joke and then without humor: NPC. Not metaphorically. Literally. Background characters inside someone else’s machine. The comparison resonated because it mapped too well.

    As time felt less inhabitable, people did what humans have always done. They looked backward. Ancient calendars resurfaced. So did old warnings about time itself. The Book of Enoch reappeared, not for its angels or apocalyptic imagery, but for its insistence that when rulers alter the calendar, disorder follows. Not because the heavens change — but because human reckoning does.

    By December 2025, attention turned upward again. An interstellar object passed through public consciousness. Astronomers were calm. The math closed. There was no threat. The sky behaved perfectly, which somehow made it worse. Precision without meaning unsettled people already out of sync with the calendar.

    At the same time, arguments about years returned. Snake. Horse. Collapse. Acceleration. These weren’t predictions. They were attempts to locate ourselves inside time again.

    The episode closes by asking a quieter question.

    If earlier countercultural movements, from Timothy Leary onward, tried to escape systems that felt dishonest or misaligned, what does agency look like now that there is no outside left to retreat into?

    The answer isn’t withdrawal. It’s re-entry.

    Calendars were never neutral. They were built to make time inhabitable — to space loss, to allow for return, to insist that beginnings and endings mattered. When they fail, people don’t abandon time. They rebuild it together.

    That is the work waiting for us in 2026.

    Not to outrun time.Not to optimize it.But to inhabit it again — deliberately, imperfectly, and humanly.

    Thank you for sharing this pause in time.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit multiversethinking.substack.com
    Show More Show Less
    24 mins
No reviews yet