16. Should randos rule the world?
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
Imagine if a House of Parliament or Congress wasn't elected. Wouldn't that be undemocratic? Actually, it could be more democratic.
To get elected, politicians join a party, toe the party's line, raise money, and look after the powerful first. They are unrepresentative in other ways—they are twice as educated, many times better off, and middle-aged. Though in America, as in Soviet Russia towards the end, we're getting used to 80-somethings running the show.
So how do we make politicians more representative? Don't elect them.
Instead, have a people's branch selected by lottery, just as juries are. We trust juries to decide whether a suspected criminal goes free, so why shouldn't we trust people like us to have a say in our taxes or how we regulate media?
In this week's video, I explore how regular people in citizens' juries take their duties seriously, seeking compromise and turning the tide against the engines of oligarchy. It's a way to bring some calm and sanity to our democracies by allowing everyday folk to talk things over and think things through.
▶ Enjoy the next episode next week
📽️ Find this video on YouTube
🎙️ Listen to the “Talking it Through” episode where I talk more about these ideas on YouTube or Spotify
👉 Join the conversation on my Discord server