What Really Happened in Congo cover art

What Really Happened in Congo

The CIA, the Murder of Lumumba, and the Rise of Mobutu

 Preview

Audible Standard 30-day free trial

Try Standard free
Select 1 audiobook a month from our entire collection.
Listen to your selected audiobooks as long as you're a member.
Get unlimited access to bingeable podcasts.
Standard auto renews for £5.99 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

What Really Happened in Congo

By: Stephen R. Weissman
Narrated by: Kevin Stillwell
Try Standard free

£5.99 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Buy Now for £1.79

Buy Now for £1.79

About this listen

Newly available evidence shows that the CIA engaged in pervasive political meddling and paramilitary action in Congo during the 1960s - and that the local CIA station chief directly influenced the events that led to the death of Patrice Lumumba, the country's first democratically elected prime minister.

©2014 Foreign Affairs (P)2014 Audible, Inc. Social Sciences
All stars
Most relevant
Short and worthwhile, but so much is missing! I suppose the truth which is widely known by Afrikans on the continent and in the diaspora will forever remain a mystery in public. Lumumba forever!!!

Worth a listen...

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Enjoyable and informative way of spending half an hour of your time.
Will be seeking out further works by Foreign Affairs.

Worthy of half an hour.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
a very brief description which left me wanting more..
a little disappointing as unexpected ending.

what happened in the Congo

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Lots of good background and poor conclusions.

It's written from an American perspective entirely, and is therefore at best an arse covering article. Obviously.

Interesting. Misleading. Informative.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
it seems the CIA was constantly playing catchup with Russia, who had its claws in Africa way before the US understood the potential for natural and human resources.
that sounds like one badly informed foreign affairs policy.
looking back, considering how much money was wasted in the “catchup” game, military sponsorships and “diplomatic” bribery wasn’t the right way to get mass support. military focused organisations forget the humanitarian aspect, and pump money sometimes in the wrong place.
fast-forward to today, when AIDS is recognised officially, a strongly funded AIDS policy would have done better (lifespan, human resources, financial resources, immigration, foreign investments, and more on this track).

informative

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.