The Enneads
Volume 1 (1-3)
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to basket failed.
Please try again later
Add to wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Remove from wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Adding to library failed
Please try again
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Get 30 days of Standard free
£5.99/mo after trial. Cancel monthly.
Buy Now for £15.58
-
Narrated by:
-
Peter Wickham
-
By:
-
Plotinus
Yet Plotinus, who spoke Greek, did not actually leave a written legacy of his ideas. His work was written down and compiled by a pupil, Porphyry of Tyre (c234-c305 CE). Porphyry presented Plotinus' work in six 'Enneads', each containing nine 'Tractates' - (ennea = 'nine' in Greek), amounting to 54 treatises in all. They were originally arranged into three volumes, but in this Ukemi recording they are divided into two equal parts. The first three Enneads contained in this recording are prefaced by the fascinating biography written by Porphyry, who describes Plotinus as a highly singular figure - he declined to sit for a painter or sculptor, he wouldn't eat meat from animals reared for the table, and he 'caught philosophy at the age of 20'.
The First Tractate of the First Ennead opens with 'The Animate and the Man'; subjects of other tractates include 'On Virtue', 'On True Happiness', and 'On the Primal Good and Secondary Forms of Good'. The Second Ennead opens with 'On the Cosmos or the Heavenly System' and continues with 'The Heavenly Circuit' and 'Are the Stars Causes?' The Third Ennead opens with 'Fate' and continues with two essays: 'On Providence' and then 'Our Tutelary Spirit'. Peter Wickham, in this first audiobook recording of the Enneads, presents Plotinus in a clear and steady manner.(P)2017 Ukemi Productions
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
The level of difficulty and complexity involved in the concepts, and the use of complicated sentence construction highlights how much more intelligent Plotinus was then, than the majority are today. I’ve read quite a few classics and this one doesn’t disappoint, just know that it’s not easy. However, I’m a believer that sometimes you have to go further back in time to read up on topics like those discussed here, than more modern versions, as the modern works are mostly dumbed down, whereas the classics are pure. Sure, time and science will altar some aspects of discussion, but not all, and all can be taken into account.
Complex, difficult, perplexing, and wonderful
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
extremely well read, the classic of Neoplatonism
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
very interesting
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.