good, though a bit biased

the author speaks of his experiences in the UDSR prisons and of his experiences in the Israeli hovernment. He dxplains hia bias towsrd the end: he is a zionist, so believes jews have the right to live in ancient Jewish lands.
I am an anarchist, so I do not agree: the concept of nation states continues to cause problems.
still: a good book, not many leaps of logic (apart from yhe aforementioned nation state-matter.)

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

Yes

This is quite possibly the first time I have ever read a book of this genre and thought, “Yes - that makes perfect sense.” Using a model of the collapse of the Soviet Union, of which he has first hand experience as a dissident, Sharansky discusses the difference between “free” and “fear” societies, and how the model can be applied to nations such as the Middle East; that democracy is a result of a free society, and not the reverse; that empowering the leaders of fear societies, however well-intentioned, just doesn’t work. And that the dissidents within fear societies are the ones who need to be empowered, by linkage - that is, linking foreign aid to how a society treats its people. It’s so sad that the free world has not learnt from the lessons the USSR taught us - perhaps the saddest thing is that Russia was allowed to fall backwards into a fear society once more. Freedom is precious.
For anyone who thinks this is too “Israelcentric” - read it / listen to it anyway, if for no other reason than to be exposed to the concepts Sharansky puts forward, and to see how they can be applied to any fear society.
Maybe one day, instead of a United Nations, all nations will deservedly be in a “United Democracies”.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

very biased and no content

i found it very biased. there was no real reference to any wrongdoing by the USA or israel. Content was poor enough also. it was all just freedom this and freedom that. No real substance.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

This speaks only to the converted

This reading presents a view from a (very?) Jewish or Israeli perspective. (The distinction is discussed.) However, it comes.across as a lecture determined to explain, justify and support the Israeli approach to the Palestine situation.
I might have been more.receptive if the reader had sounded less like an English voice coach and more in tune with what the author might sound like
At times, some of the language about the Palestinians and other Arabs, bordered on racist and it was difficult to feel better informed, let alone persuaded.
As I said, this is targeted at those already converted and contributes little more than propaganda to those of a neutral persuasion.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!