The Blind Spot cover art

The Blind Spot

Why Science Cannot Ignore Human Experience

Preview

Audible Standard 30-day free trial

Try Standard free
Select 1 audiobook a month from our entire collection.
Listen to your selected audiobooks as long as you're a member.
Get unlimited access to bingeable podcasts.
Standard auto renews for £5.99 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

The Blind Spot

By: Adam Frank, Marcelo Gleiser, Evan Thompson
Narrated by: Perry Daniels
Try Standard free

£5.99 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Buy Now for £12.99

Buy Now for £12.99

About this listen

In The Blind Spot, astrophysicist Adam Frank, theoretical physicist Marcelo Gleiser, and philosopher Evan Thompson call for a revolutionary scientific worldview, where science includes-rather than ignores or tries not to see-humanity's lived experience as an inescapable part of our search for objective truth. They urge practitioners to reframe how science works for the sake of our future in the face of the planetary climate crisis and increasing science denialism.

When we try to understand reality only through external physical things imagined from this outside position, we lose sight of the necessity of experience. This is the Blind Spot, which the authors show lies behind our scientific conundrums about time and the origin of the universe, quantum physics, life, AI and the mind, consciousness, and Earth as a planetary system. The authors propose an alternative vision: scientific knowledge is a self-correcting narrative made from the world and our experience of it evolving together.

The Blind Spot goes where no science book goes, urging us to create a new scientific culture that views ourselves both as an expression of nature and as a source of nature's self-understanding, so that humanity can flourish in the new millennium.

©2024 Adam Frank, Marcelo Gleiser, and Evan Thompson (P)2024 Tantor
History History & Philosophy Movements Philosophy Science Mathematics
All stars
Most relevant
As a scientist, listening this philosophers select and party outdated point of view how science and technology should be developed, was not helpful at all.
M.Sc, PhD

Subjectivity instead of Objectivity?

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.