The Anti-Innovators
How Special Interests Undermine Entrepreneurship
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to basket failed.
Please try again later
Add to wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Remove from wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Adding to library failed
Please try again
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
£0.00 for first 30 days
LIMITED TIME OFFER
Get 3 months for £0.99/mo
Offer ends 29 January 2026 at 11:59PM GMT.
Prime members: New to Audible? Get 2 free audiobooks during trial.
Just £0.99/mo for your first 3 months of Audible.
1 bestseller or new release per month—yours to keep.
Listen all you want to thousands of included audiobooks, podcasts, and Originals.
Auto-renews at £8.99/mo after 3 months. Cancel monthly.
Thousands of incredible audiobooks and podcasts to take wherever you go.
Immerse yourself in a world of storytelling with the Plus Catalogue - unlimited listening to thousands of select audiobooks, podcasts and Audible Originals.
£8.99/month after 30 days. Renews automatically. See here for eligibility.
Buy Now for £1.79
-
Narrated by:
-
Kevin Stillwell
-
By:
-
James Bessen
About this listen
Multibillion-dollar valuations in Silicon Valley have obscured underlying problems in the way the United States develops technology. Government policies increasingly favor powerful interest groups over promising start-ups, stifling technological innovation.
©2015 Foreign Affairs (P)2015 Audible, Inc.interesting article, especially the points about patents, but i disagree with the idea that policy reform is needed to join commercial work and defence contracting. user privacy, data security, national security are just a few basic things that, in my opinion, require for the separation to exist. commercialising defence technology should be made only after extensive analysis and review of policy and purpose, to not risk national security. a very simple example would be commercialising the latest rocket navigation tech, should anyone be able to purchase it after development? sure, we have the very famous www example, presented here, but civilian users using it was part of the original defence plan, so it’s not really applicable. but the article is well intentioned still, since the legislation around this can bring a lot of overhead, and a desire for reform is understandable.
interesting
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.