Compelling book in an pleasant voice

What made the experience of listening to Supreme Commander the most enjoyable?

Even if not all the facts are correct, as stated by a reviewer on Amazon.com, this is a compelling read. It is an evenly paced, extremely well written story that obviously needed (re)telling, as MacArthur's astounding achievements in Japan are today largely forgotten. My knowledge about MacArthur, gleaned from reading about the Pacific theater, was of an accomplished general, but a flawed, vain and self-centered man. This book changed my perception about him completely. I certainly am going to read more about MacArthur and I hope I can find more biographers like Mr. Morris, who give MacArthur the credit he is due.

What about Charles Constant’s performance did you like?

The reader did his job very well. He has a very pleasant voice, not much of an accent and a tempo that suited me fine. I hate overbearing, brass voices, with heavy American accents.

3 people found this helpful

Strains of Hagiography....

Would you try another book from Seymour Morris and/or Charles Constant?

Perhaps.

How would you have changed the story to make it more enjoyable?

Its non-fiction, but I would have put in more human interest stories rather than broader policy debates and discussions.

Still, there is plenty of human interest and its gripping.

What did you like about the performance? What did you dislike?

Its an interesting story well told. But its worship of MacArthur gets monotonous. After all, he was a man, and had his flaws. For instance, the decision to sweep war crimes under the carpet was hugely significant. The book largely veers away from discussing the graphic details of those crimes, as well as how the perpetrators got away.

It does discuss the commander of Unit 731, but largely in the context of how MacArthur had no choice but to let him off scot free.

Did Supreme Commander inspire you to do anything?

Nope.

2 people found this helpful

Balanced and Well Researched

This was an excellent book; well researched and was written in a very balanced manner. With General Mac, from my previous research, the authors either loved him or hated him and texts were written accordingly. This book has to go down as the most balanced I have read to date.

2 people found this helpful

Factual mistakes make me question his conclusions

Is there anything you would change about this book?

MacArthur never lived near the sea, we are told by Morris, even though he lived in Manilla (a port city). The US advance in Korea stalled out near the 38th, we are told, even though it was had plenty of momentum when it stopped voluntarily north of the parallel. The subject matter is fascinating, but the slipshod research makes me question the entire work.

1 person found this helpful

Very well written

Great story about a very complex man and nation. Author glosses over a few warts on both but stays pretty close to the truth.

1 person found this helpful

Interesting history, excellently narrated

Would you recommend this audiobook to a friend? If so, why?

Douglas MacArthur was one of the greatest and most fascinating war leaders America every produced, I think the only General to be awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor. But as this book shows, MacArthur also excelled in his peacetime achievements. Almost no one expected that the bushido culture of Japan, steeped in militarism, could be turned around. Yet MacArthur did it. Morris's book also tells a lot about economics and politics, relating how MacArthur set the nation on a course to prosperity and democracy.

The book is excellently narrated by Charles Constant. He has done other WWII histories, and has become a world-class vocal chronicler. I enjoy how he paces his story, and how his voice inflections can be grim, enthusiastic, momentous -- whatever is called for by the material. He's an extremely versatile narrator. Constant is becoming my first choice for voice acting of serious works.

Any additional comments?

There are historical errors in Morris's book. My major quibble is that he doesn't take MacArthur to task for his treatment of General Yamashita, who was convicted of war crimes and executed. MacArthur pushed hard for Yamashita's execution. The verdict was appealed to him, and he refused to reduce it, even though it was clearly established that Yamashita was not responsible for the Phillipine atrocities. It was his subordinates who committed the Manila and other atrocities, in direct contravention of Yamashita's orders. For a very good recounting of this incident, and the flaw in MacArthur's character, read James Webb's "The Emperor's General".

Overall, this book is interesting and informative. And the narration is excellent.

Craig.

2 people found this helpful