McMindfulness
How Mindfulness Became the New Capitalist Spirituality
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Get 3 months for £0.99/mo
Buy Now for £11.99
-
Narrated by:
-
Jeff Harding
-
By:
-
Ronald E Purser
About this listen
Mindfulness is now all the rage. From celebrity endorsements to monks, neuroscientists and meditation coaches rubbing shoulders with CEOs at the World Economic Forum in Davos, it is clear that mindfulness has gone mainstream. Some have called it a revolution.
The evangelical promotion of mindfulness as a panacea for all that ails us has begun to give way to a backlash, with questions arising whether its claims for achieving happiness, wellbeing and career success have been over-sold. Expanding on his influential essay ''Beyond McMindfulness'', Ronald Purser debunks the so-called ''mindfulness revolution'', arguing its proponents have reduced mindfulness to a self-help technique that fits snugly into a consumerist culture complicit with Western materialistic values.
In a lively and razor-sharp critique of mindfulness as it has been enthusiastically co-opted by corporations, public schools and the U.S. military, Purser explains why such programs inevitably fall short of their revolutionary potential. Simply paying attention to the present moment while resting snugly in our private bubbles is no mindfulness revolution. Mindfulness has become the new capitalist spirituality, a disciplined myopia, that mindlessly ignores the need for social and political change.
©2019 Ronald Purser (P)2019 W. F. HowesSome fantastic points - the great hijack of mindfulness
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
The first is the author's exact stance towards the practices. He's a Buddhist himself, and there are times when the argument assumes a necessary sanctity to Buddhist religious thinking that not everyone might be willing to extend. As an example, he acknowledges that Buddhism has been co-opted in the past for repressive and statist uses but does not, for the religiously sceptical, fully explain why this is less a part of Buddhism than the revelatory and liberational potential he sees in it. Connected to this is his insistence that mindfulness cannot itself teach ethics and is therefore suspect or useless - but he does not consider how mindfulness might fit in with someone's extant, non-buddhist, ethics as a supplement. I base this on my own experience; I find mindfulness a useful adjunct to my practices, which include a functional ethics.
Probably the most significant issue is his uneasiness about whether or not mindfulness actually works. Obviously, the claims for mindfulness in the early stages were greatly exaggerated. His attack on the methods and reporting employed to do this is a strong area of the book, and more sober reviews has swept many of those claims away - but it leaves a problem for the book. If mindfulness doesn't really work, why should we care if the idiots of capital expend resources on its use? His argument about how it can still be used to shift responsibility for self management onto the individuals, rather than allowing for a critical examination of the connections around us, is still pertinent, but the extension - mindfulness itself shaping us as neoliberal agents - becomes less convincing.
Still a cracking listen/read, though!
Jon Kabat-Zinn? Jon Kabat Burn, am I right?
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
If you're already Marxist - you'll love this; otherwise, I can't see how most of the critique is relevant.
just for Marxists
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Brilliant!
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Included in my favourite books list.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.