Loved it, but some philosophy background needed.

The book begins with a quote that says “you can’t do much carpentry with bare hands and you can’t do much thinking with your bare brain.” The first chapter catalogues some “tools” of philosophy designed to help thinking such as reductio ad absurdum, Occam’s Razor, and other useful ones that Dennett and his colleagues have invented more recently. These tools may have originated with philosophers, but they have application outside the world of philosophy and are generally helpful “tools” for critical thinking.

But after this short introduction, Dennett primarily focuses on debates native to academic philosophy. He does so using “intuition pumps,” i.e., thought experiments. Just a fair warning: these are tools for thinking about specific puzzles in academic philosophy. Unlike a concept such as reductio ad absurdum, these intuition pumps really aren’t transportable outside of the specific philosophical puzzles they are designed to explore. So, the book’s title, “Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking,” should have a subtitle: “…about Certain Problems in Academic Philosophy.”

Topics explored include: meaning, evolution, the nature of consciousness/materialism (including extensive discussion of the Chinese room and Mary in the black and white room); and free will. Dennett seems to presume some familiarity with these topics. And, it’s hard to imagine that a reader would really enjoy the discussion without some prior interest or background. As an undergraduate and graduate student (years ago), I read many of the papers Dennett discusses.

This is dense and challenging listening, but well worth the reward -- if it's your thing. I usually have a few audible books going at one time, and I found myself choosing to listen to this one over the others. I did make a conscious effort to avoid listening when distracted or tired because it is more demanding than other audiobooks.

In the wrong hands, I fear this narration could have been trouble, but I cannot say enough good things about this heroic narrator, Jeff Crawford. His voice crackles with intelligence, clarity, and playfulness too. While a lot of that is Dennett shining through, Crawford must share the credit. This is dense stuff, but Crawford never sounds weighted down. When I finished this book, the first thing I did was to look up the other books Crawford has narrated. I'm sad to see he has only narrated a handful of others and nothing else like this.

25 people found this helpful

Not a book for listening

Any additional comments?

Dennett starts off with some simple and obvious propositions. Then things get complicated. This is probably an interesting and book to read but to listen to? Fuggedaboutit. Books like this I want to go back and reread a section, ponder a thought, etc. If you are momentarily sidetracked while gardening, driving, etc., you’ll probably lose the thread. I did. Audible should consider a warning label books of this ilk: Caution – deep thinking required, cannot be listened to while doing anything else.

26 people found this helpful

Not a book that can be effectively listened

Any additional comments?

This is not the book for listening. It requires a lot of concentration and moving to and fro both within and across chapters, which you can't do with an audio book. Perhaps it was the subject matter that made me feel that the narration was a tad fast. Should perhaps get a text version if you are interested in this.

10 people found this helpful

A bit like parallel parking a train...

Where does Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking rank among all the audiobooks you’ve listened to so far?

In the top 20
The most challenging.

Which character – as performed by Jeff Crawford – was your favorite?

The author - he is a character

Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?

I did algebra in my head just to relax after reading.

Any additional comments?

Through some un-natural selection I got Dennett’s book and I must say I admire it’s intelligent design.
It is, however, a bit like parallel parking a train….in a blizzard….on a hill. I thought of myself as a philosophic thinker but I renewed my subscription to Mad Magazine because I just realized that my brain never left 5th grade. I’m betting that Dennett’s thoughts actually have measurable mass and gravity and will likely speciate at some point.

This is the most challenging book I’ve read/listened to in recent memory. I don’t know if it would be any easier in material form, as some reviewers have suggested. Considerable portions of the book are devoted to everything that has ever been uttered (plus Dennett’s thoughts) on natural selection. I’ll go out on a limb and suggest that experienced Dennett readers will be using the 30 sec advance button. The 20 or so unfamiliar with Dennett will be using the 30 sec rewind. It’s not a hike, but rather a vertical climb, with one arm asleep (if you’re me).

7 people found this helpful

Science book written by philosopher

This book reads more like a science book than a philosophy book. The author, a philosopher, uses the tools of philosophy to fill in the blanks about how we proceed with science.

The book starts off by how we sometimes can be mislead by 'intuition pumps", thought experiments, and how we should correctly use them. He sets up the listener in how to think about problems and then delves into some big problems, such as design within the universe and what does it mean, and what is consciousness and how to think about it.

The author is a philosopher but is much more interested in understanding the scientific method as opposed to the meaning of words.

I've listened to most of the science books audible has available and a book like this helps me see beyond just the science but also how to think about the science.

This author had a theme throughout this whole book. That the start of all understanding first comes about by realizing the role of evolution in the design of all non-trivial systems.

I will read more of this author's work.

11 people found this helpful

Great listen, despite the warnings

Thought it was great a a very useful book too, valuable tools for any researcher

3 people found this helpful

Great introduction

In this book Dennett writes about tools for thinking rather than about specific topics. He does, however, use his usual topics as examples. As a book on thinking tools, it is interesting, but not great. As an introduction to Dennett's thinking, it is a great book. You get an easy and entertaining summary of the thoughts of one of the most important philosophers of our time. If you have already read a number of his books, this one might serve to remind you, but will not contribute much new and original thought.

7 people found this helpful

Awful book!

This is an awful book. The title is misleading. This book is an extensive rant trying to promote The THEORY of Evolution. The author seems to think that if he drones on long enough he can declare the second law of thermodynamics as null and void. Evolutionists argue that it does not apply because the Earth is not a closed system. However, the UNIVERSE IS a closed system and the Earth is just a part of that closed system, so the law does apply. The complexity of the systems that make up life as well as the conditions under which life can exist are absolutely mind-boggling. Anyone who has a comprehensive knowledge of the sciences cannot possibly believe that all of this happened by chance even when given an infinite amount of time.

1 person found this helpful

My goodness Daniel...

His ability to navigate ideas left me speechless. His views on consciousness are immensely compelling and I find myself entranced in thought over them.

1 person found this helpful

very nice

you guys will have to use the go back 30 seconds button if you want to get the must out of this audio book.

1 person found this helpful