Good book, poor performance

While (as the book's ending will show -- no spoilers here) the decision to have the story read in a female American voice is logical, the actor chosen here is not an ideal choice, as she clearly has a much smaller personal vocabulary than the author. She constantly mis-stressed and mispronounced words (steepled, basso, Hades, concupiscence, mountebank), substituting more familiar ones in some places ('connection' for 'contention', 'slivers' for 'silvers', etc). Surely one of the jobs of those at Whole Book Audio should be to ensure that the performance represents the book accurately, otherwise one might as well get a free LibriVox recording. I have decided to write this review (something I rarely do) because I have noticed the same fault on too many of Whole Book Audio's other recordings, and they really need to improve this aspect of their business (the second narrator in David Mitchell's _The Bone Clocks_ was a particularly egregious example).

_Golden Hill_ is set in New York City of the early 18thC and includes a cast of characters with a variety of accents, some of which the reader executed more successfully than others, with her attempt at Scottish sounding very East European. _Golden Hill_ also includes brilliant set-pieces of performance within the novel: a Sinterklaasavond feast, Bonfire Night ('Pope Night'), and the performance of a play. In the last of these, it is central to the plot that two of the characters are much better actors than the others, but the reader was unable to portray the differences between the terrible acting and the great acting, flattening them out to much of a muchness.

I've focused on the performance here because I found it detracted from my enjoyment of what, had I merely read it in my head, would have struck me as a well written, entertaining, and unusual story. Until a better recording is produced, I recommend buying the book and reading it yourself!

33 people found this helpful

I so wanted to love this book..

...but it just didn't quite work for me. It's been reccommended to me often as a match for many authors I like and mentioned in the same breath in reviews... but I found it rather slow and found myself muttering 'get on with it' towards the end of the book.

This isn't helped by the narration. As mentioned in many other reviews, there are strange pronunciations and even stranger accents. I found the 'african' ones particularly wearing. I'm left wondering if I'd have loved this book more if I'd read it rather than listened to it.

I feel rather let down - it's a long listen for something that for me never quite got going. That said, I was very gripped by a long bonfire night sequence. But much less so by the other set pieces (in particular the court scene had me wishing it would move more quickly).

5 people found this helpful

better read than heard

The narrator mangled the story..She mispronounced lots of words which became annoying especially in such a literary book. For example Colley Cibber was Poet laureate and the target of Pope's Dunciad so this would have been easy to check even if the narrator wasn't familiar with English Literature. She said his name several ways, all of them wrong. The producers should have checked that Borges understood what she was reading and she should have checked the pronunciation of unfamiliar words, even when these were quite simple like "wanly". Unfortunately it really spoilt it for me.

10 people found this helpful

Narrator isn’t that bad...

There are a lot of negative reviews about this narrator, but I think she just had a problematic start. As the book progresses, so does the performance. Stick with it, as this is a truly wonderful book that I enjoyed very much.

2 people found this helpful

Most unusual

the result of.clearly deep research and nonetheless profoundly focussed on the characters. the author luxuriates in the minutiae of human reaction and inter-action. A masterpiece in its own way. and a revelation about 18th century New York.

2 people found this helpful

Play at less than normal speed

Sarah gallops through parts of this and for the first time listening to an audible book I struggled to hear the words. I’d recommend you play it on less than full speed in order to make head and tail of the experience.

1 person found this helpful

Fabulous

A wonderful book. I loved it. It's one I'll remember. Everything - plot, language, structure, surprise ending. What more could you want. On to his new book now.

1 person found this helpful

A brilliant and utterly different historical novel

I had somehow missed 'Golden Hill' but am so glad I discovered it. Set in colonial New York in 1746 it is clever, compelling and,ultimately, moving. Not one for the hordes of ghastly self-published books and their apparent admirers on Facebook and Twitter . Just superbly conceived and expertly written .

1 person found this helpful

Interesting glimpse at colonial New York

I really enjoyed this tale of the arrival in New York in 1746 of a mysterious visitor and the unintentional effect he has on the close knit community there. Great characters.

1 person found this helpful

Engaging New York romp

Would you try another book written by Francis Spufford or narrated by Sarah Borges?

Yes - lively writing and an interesting time to read about.

Who was your favorite character and why?

The monster - really 'orrible

Would you be willing to try another one of Sarah Borges’s performances?

I enjoyed the narrator's voice but there were quite a few mispronunciations of words

Do you think Golden Hill needs a follow-up book? Why or why not?

Not really - no spoilers but it's pretty complete

Any additional comments?

Good book -worth a go and keeps it's pace up nicely - I particularly liked the Tabitha character and the card game scene.

1 person found this helpful