Tim Harford: The Accidental Economist cover art

Tim Harford: The Accidental Economist

Tim Harford: The Accidental Economist

Listen for free

View show details
Tim Harford is one of Britain's best-known explainers of economics — author of multiple bestselling books including The Undercover Economist, longtime columnist at the Financial Times, and presenter of BBC Radio 4's More or Less. But as this episode makes clear, almost none of it was planned. Tim talks to Paul Johnson and Michael Kell about a career built on curiosity, accident, and a willingness to follow what genuinely interested him rather than what seemed sensible. The career in brief Tim grew up in the south of England, a self-described nerd who wanted to write fantasy novels and published a role-playing fanzine as a teenager. He read PPE at Oxford — almost dropping economics at the end of the first year before a handwritten note from his tutor changed his mind — then spent a year teaching at University College Cork, returned to Oxford for a master's degree, and briefly considered academia before being told directly by his thesis supervisor that it wasn't where his comparative advantage lay. After an unhappy stint in management consultancy and a more interesting period working on Shell's scenarios team, he began writing The Undercover Economist in his spare time with no agent, no publisher, and no clear plan. An internship at the Financial Times, a stint at the World Bank, and then in 2006 everything came together at once: the book was published, the FT offered him a full-time role, and Radio 4 came calling. He has been presenting More or Less ever since. On almost not studying economics Tim is disarmingly honest about how little thought went into his academic choices. He ended up at Brasenose College partly because his father had been there. He chose PPE because it let him hedge between arts and sciences. He nearly dropped economics at the end of his first year and would have done so had his tutor, Peter Sinclair, not bothered to write him a letter. "If Peter had not written that letter, we certainly wouldn't be having this conversation," he says. It is a recurring theme: small moments of intervention or accident that redirected everything. On being told you're not good enough for academia When Tim was considering a return to academia, he phoned his thesis supervisor Paul Klemperer — a formidably brilliant economist — and asked what he thought. Klemperer told him plainly that it wasn't where his strengths lay. Tim recalls not feeling wounded by it at all. "He wasn't saying I was incompetent. He was saying this was not where my comparative advantage lay — and he was completely right." It is one of the episode's most memorable moments: the value of someone who respects you enough to tell you the truth. On writing The Undercover Economist The book began over coffee at Shell, when Tim told science writer David Bodanis he wanted to write something like E=mc² but for economics. Bodanis's response: "Are you waiting for permission? Who's stopping you?" Tim spent the next five years writing the book in his spare time, sending it to agents who responded with "maybes" rather than rejections, doing an internship at the FT, working at the World Bank — and then in 2006 it all clicked. The book caught a wave partly created by Freakonomics, which had come out six months earlier. Tim is modest about its success but characteristically analytical: "Sometimes books are popular because they're popular." On explaining economics without dumbing it down Tim is thoughtful about the craft of economic communication — finding the starting point in everyday life, making the familiar seem strange, and then explaining why it's strange. He's also clear-eyed about the limits: the book was written in the mode of a student rather than a reporter, with no interviews, no sources, just reading and observation. That constraint, he suggests, may have been part of what made it accessible. On More or Less and why numbers matter Now in his eighteenth year presenting More or Less, Tim makes a compelling case for why the programme matters: the BBC using its authority to take statistical claims seriously, to ask whether numbers are actually big or small, and to correct misinformation before it hardens into accepted wisdom. He gives a recent example spanning the menopause's effect on women's workforce participation and Manchester United's financial valuation — a range that captures exactly what the programme does. He is also honest that they make mistakes, and that the ones most likely to slip through are the ones where no one expects Tim to be wrong. On what economists should understand better Asked for the most important economic ideas he'd want people to grasp, Tim offers two: the possibility of non-zero-sum gains — that situations exist where everyone can be better off, and that economics is largely the business of finding those hidden free lunches — and the importance of scale, of asking whether something is actually big or small rather than just expressing it in impressive-sounding units. His third observation is...
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_c
No reviews yet