Why Battery Fire Safety on Airplanes Is Backwards
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
About this listen
Lithium battery fires on airplanes are rare. When they happen, they're dangerous, disruptive, and costly. What's interesting is how we've chosen to deal with that risk.
The aviation safety strategy for this focuses on what to do after a device is on fire — containment bags, emergency procedures, and diversion. Those measures work. They're also fundamentally reactive.
In this episode, I offer a clean way to think about the problem — using lithium battery fires as a case study. We'll examine:
- What actually causes lithium battery fires (thermal runaway)
- Why phone and laptop batteries fail in predictable ways
- How aircraft are trained to handle in-cabin battery fires
- Why containment isn't the same as prevention
- What an upstream, design-based safety approach could look like
This is a systems-level look at how aviation safety has historically improved — moving risk controls upstream into design standards, rather than relying on emergency response.
I walk through common objections, including:
- Don't batteries already meet safety standards?
- How could something such as this be enforced in practice?
- How do you reduce risk without unfairly burdening passengers?
If you're interested in aviation safety, engineering, or simply how complex systems fail and improve, this episode is for you.
📩 Subscribe for more episodes that use real-world problems to practice better thinking. 💬 Leave a comment — especially if you work in aviation, engineering, or safety.
#SystemsThinking #AviationSafety #PreventiveDesign