We interviewed the authors of 'The Arbitration of Commercial Disputes: International and English Law and Practice', 2nd Edition, Dr Masood Ahmed and Mr Andrew Tweeddale, about their path to co-authorship and the challenges encountered.The authors explained that progress was initially delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic and later by the Law Commission of England and Wales review of the Arbitration Act 1996. However, this delay proved beneficial, allowing them to incorporate recent legal developments, including the Arbitration Act 2025, as well as evolving practices influenced by technology and AI in arbitration.The book adopts a focused approach, dealing exclusively with commercial arbitration, unlike the first edition. This Second edition is structured chronologically, tracing the development of arbitration and guiding the reader through each stage of the arbitral process.

It also includes selected comparative perspectives beyond the UK, enhancing its global relevance.Mr Andrew also addressed developments in arbitration costs, although this discussion was cut short; no worries, this topic was explored in detail in the book.Overall, the book is a key resource for both practitioners and non-practitioners and remains a leading text in the field of arbitration.Sending love, light, peace, hope and faith,C &T, co-hosts.#arbitration #commercialarbitration #adr #disputeresolution #arbitrationlaw #england #wales #uk #education #awareness #highereducation #legalscholarship #lawbooks #arbitrationpractice #aiinlaw #legalInnovation #accesstoJustice #internationalarbitration #legaleducation #lawstudents

In this episode, we critically examined why apologies are often trivialised as mere interpersonal gestures, despite their significant legal and organisational implications. Within adversarial systems, apologies are frequently conflated with admissions of fault, creating a tension between expressing remorse and avoiding legal exposure.

Jon drew an important distinction between moral accountability and legal liability.

We further explored whether there is an apology law; its role, and its effectiveness in safeguarding individuals and organisations that express remorse, assessing whether such frameworks genuinely encourage openness or merely provide limited legal reassurance.

The discussion also addressed the organisational consequences of withheld apologies, particularly how leadership's reluctance to acknowledge harm can erode trust, damage workplace culture, and entrench conflict. In contrast, we identified the key elements of an apology within professional settings.

Finally, Jon analysed how power imbalances shape both the delivery and reception of apologies, demonstrating that in workplaces, credibility is often contingent not only on the content of the apology but also on the perceived authority and vulnerability of the speaker.

#adr #apologyinlaw #disputeresolution #conflictresolution #workplaceculture #leadership #accountability #legalliability #mediation #arbitration #apology #peace #peacemaking #restorativejustice #corporategovernance #organisationalleadership #psychologicalsafety #ethicalleadership #apologylaws #podcast #research #Justice #lawandsociety #professionalethics #evapodcast #usa #world #DEI #education #highereducation #awareness

The passing of Robert A. Baruch Bush feels deeply personal both as a scholar and as someone formed, in part, by his ideas. For many of us in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), the award-winning book, The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict, presented a fundamentally different vision from the dominant, settlement-driven paradigms of mediation. At a time when legal education often prioritises outcomes, efficiency, and closure, this book / his work invited us to slow down to see conflict not simply as a problem to be solved, but as a human interaction to be understood. Its central insight that mediation should be grounded in empowerment and recognition reshaped how many of us viewed justice itself. It challenged the assumption that resolution must be measured by agreement alone, and instead advanced the idea that transformation subtle, relational, deeply human may be the more meaningful outcome. I was drawn to his work as an LLM student in Dispute Resolution at Kingston University London where I returned to his ideas repeatedly in my family mediation assessments. There was something profoundly compelling about a model of dispute resolution that does not impose solutions, but intentionally creates a safe space: a space for voice, a space for dignity, a space for change. At the time, many of us particularly those trained within adversarial legal frameworks were captivated by the possibility that disputes could be addressed without confrontation, without the rigid architecture of the courtroom. We did not simply study the book; we were shaped by it. It gave us hope that peacemaking is not separate from justice, but a core part of it. Yet these encounters were never merely academic. His work demanded reflection. It invited questioning. It unsettled assumptions. It became something I carried with me into my PhD at the University of Brighton, and into my subsequent scholarship and teaching. I remain especially grateful to Pamela, my family mediation lecturer at Kingston University London, who introduced me to both family mediation and this remarkable sacred textbook. God bless her. That introduction was not simply academic; it was formative. What distinguishes Professor Bush’s contribution is not only its theoretical precision, but its humanity. He reminded us quietly but powerfully that mediation is, at its core, is about people. About how individuals understand themselves, about how they perceive one another, and about the possibility that, even in conflict, there can be recognition, growth, and transformation. This perspective has remained with me not only as a researcher, but as an educator. Each time I introduce his ideas to students, it feels less like teaching doctrine and more like opening a door into a different way of seeing conflict: one that privileges dignity over dominance, understanding over expediency, and transformation over mere settlement. Today, the transformative model Prof Bush championed has extended far beyond its original conceptual boundaries. It is now applied across diverse contexts family disputes, workplace conflicts, community tensions, organisational challenges, and even public policy dialogues. Yet its essence remains unchanged: a steadfast commitment to the moral and relational dimensions of human interaction. And so, his legacy continues/endures not only in books or citations, but in practice. In the mediator who chooses to listen more deeply, in the parties who begin, even tentatively, to see each other differently, in the quiet, often unseen moments where conflict shifts from destructive to constructive.

Description /tribute continues on Expert Views on ADR (EVA) Vid/ Podcast Show #Youtube.Sending love, light, peace, hope and faith,

C x

#tribute #inmemory #legacy #restinpeace #Podcast #honouringalegend #adr #mediation #lawstudents #researchimpact #DEI #world #expertViewsonadr #EVApodcast #adrpodcast #legalpodcast #thoughtleadership