Aion
Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Get 3 months for £0.99/mo
Buy Now for £10.99
-
Narrated by:
-
David Rintoul
-
By:
-
C. G. Jung
About this listen
Aion is one of the major works of C.G. Jung's later years.
The title comes from the Greek word for aeon or age and refers to the age of Christianity, for, in Aion, Jung is concerned with the collective psychic development that the Christian era represents. How did it come about when it did? What psychic change did it represent? In exploring these questions, Jung (1875-1961) draws upon Christian symbolism and, in particular, the figure of Christ as a case study in the archetype of the Self.
The book begins with an account of the important concepts of the ego, the shadow and the anima/animus (here referred to as the syzygy). Jung then continues with his exploration of the Self archetype as represented through Christian symbolism and the figure of Christ. In particular, a discussion and critique of the Christian view of evil is provided. The symbolism of the fish, which recurs as a symbol of both Christ and of the devil, is examined in detail and a wide range of alchemical, pagan and gnostic material is drawn upon. The final chapter of the book proposes a model for the structure of the Self.
Aion is one of the most important volumes of the Collected Works and complements The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Translated by R. F. C.Hull.
PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying PDF will be available in your Audible Library along with the audio.
©1959 Bollingen Foundation Inc (P)2022 Ukemi Productions LtdParadise
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Thought provoking and well narrated
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
However, the narrator is simply horrible.
That he has a nice voice and good diction means little if he continuously stresses the wrong words and assigns inaccurate energy and tone to sentences. More often than not he will read something in a way that comes across pompous, erroneous and frankly irrelevant.
When it comes to books like this one, you need to be a professor with 30 years of experience to read it accurately. Therefore, the best thing to do is to simply read. Read it nicely and in a calm manner that will aid in digestion of material. If you do anything else you'll only take away from the content and that is not something some meaningless narrator should do.
The book is important, the narrator is horrible.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
But it's also a dull excuse to theory craft around obscure 16th century astrological manuscripts. That's what you're getting. I feel sorry for any of his students who might have had to study this as part of his classes. It's on the level of post-modern mumbo-jumbo like Derrida.
Not what you think
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
loved it 💯
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.