The Inner Level cover art

The Inner Level

How More Equal Societies Reduce Stress, Restore Sanity and Improve Everyone's Well-being

Preview

Get 30 days of Premium Plus free

£8.99/month after 30-day free trial. Cancel monthly.
Try for £0.00
More purchase options
Buy Now for £12.99

Buy Now for £12.99

About this listen

Penguin presents the audiobook edition of The Inner Level by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, read by Finlay Robertson.

Why is the incidence of mental illness in the UK twice that in Germany? Why are Americans three times more likely than the Dutch to develop gambling problems? Why is child well-being so much worse in New Zealand than Japan? As this groundbreaking study demonstrates, the answer to all these hinges on inequality.

In The Spirit Level Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett put inequality at the centre of public debate
by showing conclusively that less-equal societies fare worse than more equal ones across everything
from education to life expectancy. The Inner Level now explains how inequality affects us individually,
how it alters how we think, feel and behave. It sets out the overwhelming evidence that material
inequalities have powerful psychological effects: when the gap between rich and poor increases, so does the tendency to defi ne and value ourselves and others in terms of superiority and inferiority. A deep well of data and analysis is drawn upon to empirically show, for example, that low social status is associated with elevated levels of stress, and how rates of anxiety and depression are intimately related to the inequality which makes that status paramount.

Wilkinson and Pickett describe how these responses to hierarchies evolved, and why the impacts of
inequality on us are so severe. In doing so, they challenge the conception that humans are innately
competitive and self-interested. They undermine, too, the idea that inequality is the product of 'natural' differences in individual ability. This book sheds new light on many of the most urgent problems facing societies today, but it is not just an index of our ills. It demonstrates that societies based on fundamental equalities, sharing and reciprocity generate much higher levels of well-being, and lays out the path towards them.

Medicine & Health Care Industry Mental Health Political Science Politics & Government Psychology Psychology & Mental Health Social Classes & Economic Disparity Social Psychology & Interactions Sociology United States World Capitalism Health Socialism Economic disparity Taxation Social justice Economic Inequality

Critic reviews

The question of inequality is likely to play a bigger role in the next election than it has for more than a generation. It would be better for all of us if that debate was informed by robust statistical analysis rather than the emotive politics of envy. Any politician wishing to do so would be wise to read Wilkinson and Pickett's books. (Andrew Anthony)
All stars
Most relevant
A wider understanding of these challenging issues are vital to conceptualise and implement societal change.

A powerful argument well made

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

A thorough analysis of inequality and its devastating consequences on physical and mental health. Our society has to change to avoid complete social, economic and environmental collapse.

An urgent call for change.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

I hesitate to say the performance is quite flat which makes this a tougher listen, but the writing is superb. a genuinely brilliant follow up to their previous work.

Thoughtful, challenging

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

Incredibly interesting, it's very accessible even for non-specialist. It really changed the way I look at the world now. Highly recommended

Bind blowing

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

Compelling presentation of data around inequality but conclusions seem to be a little bit uncritical of the socialist solution. It’s as if the 20th century didn’t happen. That said, still worth a read if you still think “greed is good”.

Is research driving ideology or ideology driving research conclusions?

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.