Must suspend disbelief - about awful narration

Would you recommend this audiobook to a friend? If so, why?

Without hesitation. Especially to a Star Trek hater, or worse, a Star-Wars-is-better-than-Trek malcontent. This book provides rich ammunition to explain why Star Trek is so much more than a mere Sci-Fi entertainment franchise: it's an institution deeply woven into the fabric of American culture, ethics and technological progress that has literally changed history, and continues to do so.

Who was your favorite character and why?

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. See below for explanation.

What didn’t you like about Kim McKean’s performance?

Star Trek fans are singularly capable of suspending disbelief (hello warp speed, time travel, and at times even terrible acting and props that came straight out of a middle school woodworking class). But I would sooner see Capt. Picard pray at the altar of Luke Skywalker, or Lt. Uhura join the Maquis and murder a million innocent bystanders, than have to hear Ms. McKean's bright chipper voice refer one more time to Star "Track," Lt. "Uhawrah," the "Markee," or innocent "bystandards." Her verbal atrocities are all the more glaring because they are not limited to Trek-specific terms and they stand in such stark contrast to her otherwise dilithium crystal-clear diction. I'm not exaggerating, and I'm not prone to oversensitivity. I tried to treat it like a game at first (in fact, paired with Romulan ale or even prune juice it would make an epic--albeit lethal--drinking game), but by Chapter 8 I couldn't take it anymore. This is what it must sound like to hear George Bush (either one) recite French poetry. At least they don't even try, let alone get paid to do it. Please, please -- I'm no professional, but I would volunteer my time as a community service to record this program again if Audible would agree to send a free copy to every poor soul who had to listen to this version. My qualifications are that I have a pulse, have watched more than 20 minutes of a single Star Trek episode or movie in my life, and can read and pronounce correctly nearly every word on my 8th grade spelling test.

Did you have an extreme reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?

No joke, I choked up a little when I learned that Martin Luther King Jr. personally implored Nichelle Nichols not to depart the cast after the first season because of the profound impact her presence had on the civil rights movement, both in terms of America's perception of and exposure to black people, and as a role model. He said it was significant not merely because she was a black actress on primetime network television, but because her character, while supporting, was not relegated to some traditionally subservient "black" role -- she was the chief communications officer and fourth in command on the bridge. I mean, seriously, Star Trek has genuinely affected the course of history in the 20th and 21st centuries in myriad ways; this is just a particularly shining example.

Any additional comments?

Not all of the essays in this book contain sweeping revelations about the societal significance of Star Trek, nor are they intended to. There is a surprisingly diverse mix of subject matter viewed through the lenses of different academic disciplines, not all of which will appeal to everyone. I admit I was tempted to skip several chapters. But overall I was surprised at the breadth and quality of the analysis. It shed new light on episodes and themes with which I was already very familiar, which alone is worth the price of admission for Trekkies. But I think the writing and context provided would be very approachable and at least as interesting to someone with only passing familiarity with the Trek universe. Overall, highly recommended except for the catastrophically failed narration. And even that should not be a deal-breaker because at least it is eminently comprehensible, as long as you suspend disbelief.

12 people found this helpful

Brace yourself for massive mispronunciations.

I found 'Star Trek and History' a worthwhile read, despite Mrs. McKean's best efforts to throw me off track.
First, the book. The book itself is a collection of essays from various authors delving into Star Trek storylines pulled from the full spectrum of the series and movies and how those episodes and topics relate to history, current technology and social issues. Overall, the chapters are very interesting and delve deeply enough into their respective areas to make for some lively post reading discussion. In fact, this book would be a great addition to a middle or high school science or social studies curriculum. The topics are board enough and cover enough familiar territory that students would have a wonderful time watching an episode mentioned in a particular chapter and then discussing it in the terms set forth in the book.
Some chapters are stronger than others. For example, you can hardly go wrong with discussions on how Star Trek's visionary technology has shaped our current lives (flip phones and iPads anyone?) and the impact it has had on our space program. I even found the chapter on cartography quite interesting, especially in the context of stellar cartography and the future of mapping our known galaxy. Other chapters however fall quite flat. Yes, "Facebook as the Borg" makes for a fun Internet meme, but the analogy really does fall apart if you put any real thought behind it.
My overall impression is that the book is a fun, insightful look at some of the serious (and not so serious) topics tackled by the Star Trek writers.
Now, the narrations. The only reason Kim McKean did not get 1 star from me on performance is that she spoke English and I was at least able to understand the words that came out of her mouth. Other than that, I felt her reading was stiff and stilted. You can almost hear the end of a line as she scans down to the beginning of the next line ... to ... read ... to ...you ... the ... very ... next ... word ... she ... sees ... on ... the ... page.
Aside from that, you can sort of get lost in the cadence and get wrapped up in the concepts of the book ... until she mispronounces a word. Repeatedly. Now, this isn't Star Trek's famous techno-babble she is getting hung up on. While she does mispronounce character names (it took me a while to figure out who "Tee Pole" was), she also mispronounces historical figures and some common words. I eventually started to make a list. Words like "Maquis", "Uhura", and "Locutus of Borg" were constantly, jarringly mispronounced. But even non Trek words and names like "Leonidas", "Yamamoto", and "omnipotent" were butchered.
That being said, as bristled by the narration as I was, I still found the subject matter engaging enough to keep at it and be entertained as well as challenged. It is a worthwhile listen, or better yet, this might be one to get in dead tree form. Then at least you have your own voice in your head to contend with.

11 people found this helpful

Dumbed Down Beyond All Tolerance

I just couldn't do it. I wanted to like this book, and I can't. On nearly every conceivable level as a geek, this book is offensive to me.

I've read the author's Star Wars and History, done in conjunction with Lucasfilm. It drew connections that aren't blatantly obvious and some that are downright esoteric (such as Leia's original "star puffs" hairstyle being drawn from photos of the Mexican Revolution). The result was an extremely satisfying read that appealed to both the fanboy and the history geek in me.

This book is the exact opposite, made worse by the fact that the narrator (I got it through Audible) is just plain bad.

Anyone who has ever seen any episode or film from any of the Star Trek series can readily identify the historical parallels because the very nature of Trek is that it draws from the culture of the time it was done and confronts social issues. That's a large part of what made it popular in the first place. The thing is, this book is presented in such a way that if you don't know the episodes by title, the short synopsis of the episode is given as nearly the complete case of the author. More time is spent on a synopsis than on drawing the parallels of history or pop culture that inspired it in the first place. Granted, with the Original Series, it's just not that difficult, and themes are repeated, but still... I expected some kind of depth. Any at all would do. As a result, this book is a dumbed down beating, made worse, as I said, by the narrator.

The narrator not only reads mechanically and sounds like her tongue is too big for her mouth, she breaks the #1 rule in my book: she can't even pronounce the name of the series. It's Star TREK, not Star TRACK. I've spent the first 40 years of my life giving non-geeks serious grief about this when they tried to use this show to tease me, back in the days when geekdom wasn't cool. Now that it IS accepted culture, it needs to be recognized that Trek has, is, and ever will be a cornerstone of that culture. Saying TRACK is not only wrong, it just comes across as stupid. I truly don't like saying it that way, but it's like I can feel the intelligence of the series being sucked right out of it... sort of like the new Abrams reboot version.

Oh well. Can't win them all.

4 people found this helpful

Just a few flaws

Most of this book is good, and pretty interesting to anyone who is a Star Trek fan. There are just a few problems though. The first is that the narrator didn't bother to find out how to pronounce several of the Star Trek specific names correctly. They are pretty big characters in the franchise as well. This won't bother most non-fans, and even a lot of fans. If you are a serious fan, ever considered calling yourself a Trekkie then I would suggest that you actually read the book rather than listening because the narrator will drive you crazy. The other thing is that, while I can't prove it, I suspect that several of the chapters are written by people who haven't ever seen an episode of any of the shows. It is possible to write about Star Trek by reading episode synopses and other academics writing about the show. If you do that though you miss a lot about what makes the show good and a lot of your assumptions don't hold up without the knowledge that watching the show brings. The section on women seemed especially guilty of this sin and was hard to listen to. Other than that though it was interesting.

1 person found this helpful

maybe an editor is needed

reader has no idea how to pronounce names, places.
makes it difficult to enjoy this book.

Should have read the blurb better

I am not a hard core Trekkie, but I grew up watching reruns of the original series and was old enough to see the movies in the theater. I wish I had read the description better and realized this was a collection of articles not a cohesive narrative. The quality of the writers varies greatly but by far the worst thing about this book is the narrator. In one of the first essays (it may even be the first one), she mispronounces the name of one of the main characters, Uhura. What's even worse is that she pronounces it correctly at first, then switches to some weird pronunciation, then goes back and forth between the two. It totally ruins the listening experience. It would have been better with a central thesis and a different narrator.

Narrator is awful

The idea of linking Star Trek to various socio political and historical themes is interesting, but could they not have chosen a narrator who knows what she's talking about?
Kim Mckean's lack of knowledge of the Star Trek universe comes out in most chapters, but none more glaringly than when she refers to Lt. Uhura as Lt. Uhara (her Irish cousin perhaps?). One could understand a single slip during the book, but it happens very frequently. One could even forgive a uniform mispronunciation of the name, but in this recording the correct and incorrect pronunciations are both used at seemingly random intervals. There even a few occasions of her flipping back and forth more than once in the same paragraph.

This might seem like a trivial complaint, but it really detracted from the listening experience. I'll be watching for her name as a narrator to avoid in future.

Good book

I love the intellectual look at Star Trek through out history but the narrator should have watched a few episodes first. Some of her pronunciations were horrible. It may have been how some of the authors wrote the words because she changed some pronunciations in certain chapters.

It's Star Trek, not Star Track

Would you listen to Star Trek and History again? Why?

Yes. This is one of the most fascinating Star Trek books I have read in, maybe forever. It's insightful, full of memorable sections, and provides a terrific social context to the episodic stories. It reminded me of why I love Star Trek, and educated me about some subtleties in history I had not correlated to certain shows. Pretty cool.

How did the narrator detract from the book?

Oh my gosh, man. In the Star Trek universe, the correct pronunciation of important terms like "Star Trek", for example, is important. How could she get this wrong? This super-slow-reading narrator destroys term after term and proper name after proper name with a shamefully incorrect rendering of them. When people mispronounce Trek terms, it's forgivable, unless it's narrating a Star Trek book. That's where it matters.

I enjoyed it!

I really enjoyed listening to this book. It offered a great perspective on how history was influenced by our favourite shows and movies. I also would recommend this book to anyone that wants to be introduced to Star Trek. I know that I'm going to ask my wife to check it out, so she knows anything she may need to know. The downside was, that the reader had obviously NEVER watched a single episode or movie of Star Trek. As evidenced by her frequently mispronouncing names of characters and planets. My biggest complaint, however, is that she never once said "Star Trek", instead saying, "Star Track". That gets us kind of riled up. Overall, a great book. Highly recommended. Thank you!