This episode provides an update on recent activity involving the use of food additive titanium dioxide (TiO2). It includes a brief background on the use of TiO2 followed by the recent inquiries into the safety of TiO2 in France and Europe, and a recent statement by FDA confirming the safety of the food additive. Dr. Ivan Boyer, a staff toxicologist at Keller and Heckman, shares his insights on the scientific data and the deficiencies in the EFSA assessment that underpinned the recent European ban on TiO2 as a food additive.

This episode explores California’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, also known as Proposition 65. Partner Sophie Castillo, an attorney from Keller and Heckman’s California Proposition 65 and Litigation practices, shares her insights on complying with Proposition 65. Sophie provides background on the law, the significance of a Proposition 65 warning, preemption and other legal challenges, as well as Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessments (OEHHA) and bounty hunter activity. Additionally, the episode dives into trends in the chemicals and product categories targeted by bounty hunters.

The 8th episode of Food & Chemicals Unpacked dives into the inner workings of the National Advertising Division (NAD), the advertising industry’s self-regulatory mini court. Keller and Heckman attorneys Katie Bond and Samuel (Sam) Butler, both from our Advertising and Promotion practice, join us to provide an overview of all things NAD. We cover its origin, the structure of NAD proceedings, the interaction between the NAD and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), what types of companies participate in NAD challenges, the appeals process, and more. The episode highlights the findings of a new analysis by Katie and Sam on changing outcomes at the NAD over the past few decades.