Cynical Theories kapak görseli

Cynical Theories

How Activist Scholarship Made Everything About Race, Gender, and Identity - and Why This Harms Everybody

Önizleme

Standard'ı 30 gün ücretsiz edinin

Deneme süresinden sonra aylık 5,99£. Aylık olarak iptal edilir.
0,00£ karşılığında dene
Diğer seçenekler

Cynical Theories

Yazan: Helen Pluckrose, James Lindsay
Seslendiren: Helen Pluckrose
0,00£ karşılığında dene

30 gün sonra aylık 5,99£. Dilediğiniz zaman iptal edebilirsiniz.

14,36£ karşılığında satın al

14,36£ karşılığında satın al

Season's Savings | £0.99/mo for 3 months

£5.99/mo after 3 months - terms apply. Cancel monthly

Wall Street Journal, USA Today, and Publishers Weekly best seller!

Have you heard that language is violence and that science is sexist? Have you read that certain people shouldn't practice yoga or cook Chinese food? Or been told that being obese is healthy, that there is no such thing as biological sex, or that only White people can be racist? Are you confused by these ideas, and do you wonder how they have managed so quickly to challenge the very logic of Western society?

In this probing and intrepid volume, Helen Pluckrose and James Lindsay document the evolution of the dogma that informs these ideas, from its coarse origins in French postmodernism to its refinement within activist academic fields. Today this dogma is recognizable as much by its effects, such as cancel culture and social-media dogpiles, as by its tenets, which are all too often embraced as axiomatic in mainstream media: knowledge is a social construct; science and reason are tools of oppression; all human interactions are sites of oppressive power play; and language is dangerous. As Pluckrose and Lindsay warn, the unchecked proliferation of these anti-Enlightenment beliefs present a threat not only to liberal democracy but also to modernity itself.

While acknowledging the need to challenge the complacency of those who think a just society has been fully achieved, Pluckrose and Lindsay break down how this often radical activist scholarship does far more harm than good, not least to those marginalized communities it claims to champion. They also detail its alarmingly inconsistent and illiberal ethics. Only through a proper understanding of the evolution of these ideas, they conclude, can those who value science, reason, and consistently liberal ethics successfully challenge this harmful and authoritarian orthodoxy - in the academy, in culture, and beyond.

©2020 Helen Pluckrose and James Lindsay (P)2020 Pitchstone Publishing
Education Ethics & Morality History Philosophy Political Science Politics & Government Social Sciences Society Sociology Sosyal adalet Düşündürücü Kapitalizm Liberalizm Sosyalizm Ayrımcılık Eşitlik Critical Theory
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Tüm yıldızlar
En alakalı
Finally, I understand where all this rubbish came from, why it makes absolutely no sense, and what the sane alternative is.

An aid to sanity in an increasingly insane world.

Bir sorun oluştu. Lütfen birkaç dakika sonra tekrar deneyin.

With the populist right on manouevres, the raving-mad left has been given a clear pass by those in the liberal mainstream and they've used it to bust out of their usual ivory tower and flood the mainstream under cover of social causes of undoubted value and urgency. Helen Pluckrose and James Lindsay, who both identify with the traditional liberal left, patiently and thoroughly trace the history and intellectual underpinnings of this movement from their origins with the French postmodernists in the late 60s, and the waves of postmodernism that have wound up with intersectionality, standpoint theory, queer studies, critical race theories and their equivalents for disabled and obese. I found this absolutely fascinating and enlightening (ahem) though I have a general interest in philosophy and epistemology: if you don't you might find this section rather dry. But what it does do is lay out extremely clearly the rather arch intellectual techniques used to defuse criticism and argument - including that traditional criticism, reason and argument are, in and of themselves, illegitimate expressions of male, white power which should be suppressed.

If you buy that, all hope is lost. Pluckrose doesn't and, really rather heroically, makes the case for a return to traditional liberal modernity which has vouchsafed so much social progress to exactly those groups most animated by this new militancy.

It isn't tolerant, pluralistic or openminded at all: it is coercive, intolerant and nasty and, unlike Foucault and Lacan, it has escaped the academy and is infecting thinking in human resources departments, in media organisations, and on social media. We should be worried about this. Real people are getting hurt by it, and other real people are being disgusted by it and are thus being driven towards, not away from, far less desirable forms of populism.

Pluckrose narrates in a measured and patient tone, but, in her understated way, delivers some zinging invective along the way.

Well recommended.

Excellent, brave, necessary book

Bir sorun oluştu. Lütfen birkaç dakika sonra tekrar deneyin.

Good overview of postmodern schools of thought and how they influence social justice movements.

This book certainly isn't a light read or as entertaining as Douglas Murray's Madness of crowds but it's essential read if you want a much deeper understanding of what's going on with race/gender/etc activism.

Highly recommended

Good overview of postmodernism

Bir sorun oluştu. Lütfen birkaç dakika sonra tekrar deneyin.

Two thirds of the book detail the collective madness known as critical theory, unless you are an anthropologist interested in the delusions of left wing arts and social sciences graduates this is likely to be tremendously boring.. but as this theory is using brownshirt tactics to shutdown the serious subjects at university like science and has captured media, the corporate world and government you can't dismiss its reach. For me Pluckrose gives it far too much validity and the answers in the final chapters seem inadequate but we have to hope I'm wrong or the west and its many and varied citizens are screwed.

tedious but necessary

Bir sorun oluştu. Lütfen birkaç dakika sonra tekrar deneyin.

I knew very little of Theory before reading this beyond what I had witnessed in practice, and I knew that some of it didn't quite sit right with me. This book does a really good job of explaining how this particular style of social justice emerged and why it is problematic. My biggest criticism is a technical one - the authors go to great lengths to use capitalisation to distinguish between different schools of thought, but since this is an audiobook this does not convey at all.

Very accessible and clarified my viewpoints

Bir sorun oluştu. Lütfen birkaç dakika sonra tekrar deneyin.

Daha fazla değerlendirme gör