Behavioural Economics
Psychology, neuroscience, and the human side of economics
Ürünler eklenemedi
Üzgünüz, sepetiniz kapasiteye ulaştığı için bu ürünü ekleyemedik.
Sepete ekleme başarısız oldu.
Lütfen daha sonra tekrar deneyin
İstek Listesine ekleme başarısız oldu.
Lütfen daha sonra tekrar deneyin
İstek listesinden kaldırma başarısız oldu.
Lütfen daha sonra tekrar deneyin
Kütüphaneye ekleme başarısız oldu
Lütfen tekrar deneyin
Podcast takip edilemedi
Podcast takibi bırakma başarısız oldu.
3 ay boyunca aylık £0,99
Teklif 29 Ocak 2026 tarihinde saat 23:59 GMT itibarıyla sona erer.
10,97£ karşılığında satın al
-
Seslendiren:
-
Dan Bottomley
-
Yazan:
-
David Orrell
Özet
For centuries, economics was dominated by the idea that we are rational individuals who optimise our own ‘utility’. Then, in the 1970s, psychologists demonstrated that the reality is a lot messier. We don’t really know what our utility is, and we care about people other than ourselves. We are susceptible to external nudges. And far from being perfectly rational we are prone to ‘cognitive biases’ with complex effects on decision-making, such as forgetting to prepare for retirement.
David Orrell explores the findings from psychology and neuroscience that are shaking up economics – and that are being exploited by policy-makers and marketers alike, to shape everything from how we shop for food, to how we tackle societal happiness or climate change. Finally, he asks: is behavioural economics a scientific revolution, or just a scientific form of marketing?©2021 Icon Books Ltd (P)2021 W. F. Howes Ltd
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
It lacked in the evolutionary psychology, or neuroscience, perspectives, but you can't have everything; and lots of factors were discussed with examples.
Then it all fell apart in the last hour when he abandoned objectivity on three "hot topics" (at the time of writing, I suppose):
Brexit
Covid
Climate Change
He clearly has strong opinions on these, and his biases oozed out. As just one example of many, he held up the Chinese response to Covid as a model that should have been followed in Britain. Whether he's right or wrong is irrelevant - he should have stuck with objectivity or at least chosen subjects that aren't still sensitive to many people and which don't have easy answers.
Pity - because he was much more balanced through the rest of the book. As he himself stated about us humans that experience something is that we tend to remember how things end. I will remember this book as leaving a sour taste in my mouth at the end.
It Was All Going So Well....
Bir sorun oluştu. Lütfen birkaç dakika sonra tekrar deneyin.
amusing with errors
Bir sorun oluştu. Lütfen birkaç dakika sonra tekrar deneyin.