Can artificial intelligence outperform traditional fund managers? And how much of successful investing is genuine skill rather than market luck?

In Part 1 of The Most Important Thing, Alan O’Sullivan speaks with Dr. Philip Seager, Head of Portfolio Strategy at Capital Fund Management (CFM), about the science behind quantitative investing and what it means for constructing more resilient portfolios.

Drawing on his background in experimental particle physics and more than 25 years at CFM, Philip explains how systematic investors use large datasets, statistical testing and increasingly AI to identify investment opportunities. He also explores why impressive backtests can be misleading, how market beta can be mistaken for manager skill, and why traditional diversification may fail investors when they need it most.

The conversation examines trend following as a potential source of genuine diversification, including its behaviour during prolonged equity drawdowns, the limitations exposed by rapid market reversals, and the difference between trend following and buying downside insurance.

Topics include quantitative versus discretionary investing, alternative data, AI and neural networks, overfitting, active management, the 60/40 portfolio, trend following and crisis alpha.

Read Philip’s Financial Times article referenced in the conversation:

Philip Seager — Financial Times: Beating the Market Is Even Harder Than You Think

https://www.ft.com/content/299b4cd0-9ce8-431e-aaec-3f7b8d704910

Capital Fund Management on LinkedIn

https://www.linkedin.com/company/capital-fund-management/

Additional resource

https://share.google/7AWCMqojgoG1tyZpc

The Most Important Thing Podcast | Hosted by Alan O’Sullivan

Important Disclaimer

Any statements regarding market events, future events or other similar statements constitute only subjective views, are based upon expectations or beliefs, involve inherent risks and uncertainties and should therefore not be relied on. Future evidence and actual results could differ materially from those set forth, contemplated by or underlying these statements. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that these statements are or will prove to be accurate or complete in any way. All opinions and estimates included in this document constitute judgments as at the date of this document and are subject to change without notice. CFM accepts no liability for any inaccurate, incomplete or omitted information of any kind or any losses caused by using this information. CFM does not give any representation or warranty as to the reliability or accuracy of the information contained in this document. The information provided in this document is general information only and does not constitute investment or other advice. The content of this document does not constitute an offer or solicitation to subscribe for any security or interest. The interviewer selected the graphs and images; CFM was not involved in that decision.

In this episode of The Long & Short, Ivan Yates and Dr Alan O’Sullivan revisit the Wall Street Crash of 1929, the 2008 global financial crisis and today’s concerns around AI valuations, defence stocks and changing investment regimes. From speculative bubbles to excessive private debt, they explore why crashes happen, what investors can learn from previous cycles, and whether the old investment playbook still works.

Featuring insights from previous conversations with financial historian Edward Chancellor, economist Professor Steve Keen and investor Jesse Felder, alongside an additional perspective from financial historian Professor Russell Napier.

Topics covered: historical bubbles and market psychology; the role of private debt in 2008; falling interest rates and the shift towards real assets; bull and bear markets; AI and dot-com comparisons; contrarian positioning; economic cycles; and lessons from Ireland’s financial history.

Previous guest interviews featured in this episode:

Edward Chancellor — The Price of Time and historical market bubbles

Professor Steve Keen — How he predicted the 2008 crash

Jesse Felder — The market paradigm shift since the 1980s

Professor Russell Napier — The New Rules of Money (Part 1)

Subscribe to The MOST Important Thing for interviews and commentary on markets, investing, economics and geopolitics.

For information and educational purposes only. Nothing in this episode constitutes personal investment advice. Investments involve risk, including possible loss of capital.

#FinancialMarkets #Investing #MarketHistory #FinancialCrisis #AI #Economics

Are Bonds a Buy?

This episode explores whether bonds are becoming attractive again amid sticky inflation, rising fiscal concerns, and the AI spending boom. Alan argues that bond markets are pricing in deeper risks, but the best opportunity to buy may come after a significant sell-off in US stocks.

Key topics

• Why Treasury yields have fallen despite hotter-than-expected inflation
• How public debt, fiscal deficits, and bond-market volatility may affect equities
• Why corporate bond yields could be an early warning for stocks
• How falling real yields could make gold more attractive
• Europe’s weak growth outlook and pressure on the euro
• Inflation, interest rates, and the resilient US economy
• Why Alan’s verdict on bonds is “not yet”—and what he’s watching next

Timestamps

00:00 — Are bonds a buy?
01:56 — Falling yields despite hot inflation
03:32 — The potential link between an equity correction and a bond-buying opportunity
05:31 — Debt, deficits, and bond-market concerns
06:21 — Real yields and gold
07:39 — Europe’s growth and debt concerns
08:59 — Inflation and the possibility of more Fed hikes
13:31 — Why the US economy still looks resilient
14:46 — Final verdict on bonds