Episode 5 of the Intentional Leadership series with Dave Payne is out. It's the final one.

We saved the big stuff for last: intentional leadership, what really matters, education, friendship. And a few things neither of us planned to say.

The line I always come back to when I think of Dave is ''Intentional leaders are ambitious for their people''!

Thank you, Dave.

And thank you to everyone who sent in questions. Several of them took us places we'd never have gone on our own.

To everyone who listened, commented and shared your own experiences along the way: you turned a conversation between two friends into something much bigger. Some of your stories stayed with me long after I'd read them.

A single conversation can change a life, then change a team, then change a community. Lewis sits down with Dave Payne and follow a chain of moments that starts with a simple leadership question, “Are you committed or are you interested?”, and expands into a set of stories about mentorship, E-Colours, and what it really means to pay it forward. Along the way, he and Dave revisit how leadership development becomes real when it leaves the classroom and shows up in the decisions people make under pressure.

One thread runs from Steve Craig to his daughter Kami, and all the way to the USA Olympic Water Polo training camp. We talk about coaching, communication, and why understanding different working styles can unlock teamwork fast. We also reflect on bringing students from Southwest Schools into that world, and why those experiences matter for confidence, aspiration, and long-term opportunity. The theme is constant: the ripple effect is not a metaphor, it is the actual mechanism of culture change.

We also get practical for engineers, HSE, and operational leaders. Dave shares what he wishes he had learned at 22: process safety, barriers and safeguards, human performance, risk, and the hierarchy of controls, plus a memorable “red glove day” lesson in unintended consequences. Then we tackle AI in engineering and the future of wells, keeping it grounded: don’t buy the hype, learn to use AI to make yourself better, and protect the human edge of innovation and judgement. We close by reframing legacy as something you build in real time through the people you develop, whether that’s at work, in schools, or across a massive volunteer ecosystem like the Houston Super Bowl host committee.

If this gave you a nudge to mentor someone, rethink your own legacy, or sharpen your safety thinking, subscribe, share the episode with a colleague, and leave a review. What’s one ripple effect you hope your career creates?

A leadership motto can either gather dust in a slide deck or become the sentence people carry into hard decisions. We sit down with Dave to unpack how “Clear Leader” actually takes shape during the Chevron and Unocal integration, why he says he gets too much credit for it, and what happens when you swap a complicated corporate paragraph for a phrase people can remember and choose to live by. Along the way we look at why being “second best” quietly trains an organisation to accept less than it is capable of.

The surprising twist is that a small booklet nearly derails the whole effort. Borrowing a cue from Starbucks’ old green apron book, the team drafts a Clear Leader booklet, takes it to a focus group, and then hears the line that forces a complete rethink: “I find it comforting but not inspiring.” That moment becomes a masterclass in listening, psychological safety, and the difference between messaging that sounds nice and language that actually moves behaviour.

From there we shift into practical culture tools and high-stakes governance. We talk about e-colors, personal intervention, and simple cues that help people pause and choose a better response. Then we tackle WellSafe and functional governance: business unit pushback, the importance of independent assurance, why “exceptions” break systems, and how leaders keep standards alive through reorganisations. We finish on the sharp edge of leadership: compliers versus believers, what a blunt question in Thailand revealed, and why consistency and non-negotiables are the only way culture survives a change of boss.

If you care about leadership development, organisational culture, and safety assurance that lasts, press play, then subscribe, share with a colleague, and leave a review. What’s one standard you refuse to compromise on when you lead?