The Circle Podcast — two therapists, no script, thinking out loud. kapak görseli

The Circle Podcast — two therapists, no script, thinking out loud.

The Circle Podcast — two therapists, no script, thinking out loud.

Yazan: Ari Shapero Candice Hamilton-Miller
Şimdi ücretsiz dinle, üyelik gerekmez

Season's Savings | £0.99/mo for 3 months

£5.99/mo after 3 months - terms apply. Cancel monthly
The Circle Podcast is an unscripted, fireside chat between two therapists. No theme, no lesson plan — just Candice and Ari sitting down to think out loud about the real work of being a clinician: the conversations we usually only have with each other, the questions that don't have clean answers, and the things nobody teaches you in training. It's the same thing we try to do in the therapy room: Just stay curious, drop the expert act, and see what we find when we wander around a good question together. Pull up a chair and join us.2026, CHM, The Therapist Circle Biological Sciences Hygiene & Healthy Living Philosophy Psychology Psychology & Mental Health Science Social Sciences
Bölümler
  • Yummy Vibes

    Yummy Vibes
    2 Oct 2026
    The helper’s bind. Candice opens with something she keeps running into: the moment the business side of practice meets the professional side, taking care of yourself starts to look like selfishness. Charge what you charge, take a day off, hold a boundary, and someone will call it selfish. Ari knows the feeling from music, where a musician trying to break in is expected to be grateful for the chance to play and never mind the pay. The helping professions carry the same unspoken rule: you love the work, so that should be enough. As Candice puts it, if only good vibes kept her stomach full.When your values and a client’s collide. From there they ask when a therapist gets to say no to a client. Candice walks through the examples that come up again and again on professional discussion boards: a religious therapist whose client has had an abortion, therapists on opposite sides of the vaccine divide during COVID, and a queer therapist whose long-standing client began spending sessions condemning a family member who had come out, without knowing the therapist's own identity. Do you disclose, challenge, let it go, or refer on? Ari shares how he once named a concern gently ("some relationship experts might consider some of what's going on to be toxic") rather than telling a client what to do. Candice describes an intern who was angry and frustrated with a client who kept choosing to stay with an abusive partner, and the supervisory work of separating our own wishes for a client from the client's right to choose. Ari offers a friend's line that lands well: therapists are not people without judgements; we have simply learned when sharing one will be useful and when it won't.Managing energy by managing the calendar. Ari talks openly about structuring his days and weeks around a brain injury: more space between sessions than any therapist he knows, and the occasional week where he has to cancel everyone and stop. He finds it hard to watch clients insist they cannot slow down when he knows how necessary it can be. Candice describes the opposite pace, eight to ten sessions back to back three days a week with two days fully off, and how she needs a mix of case types through the day to stay sharp. The clinic's new practice management system lets clients book themselves in, and she has been surprised by the sigh that comes with each "someone booked in" notification. She realised she had been managing her energy by managing her calendar. Ari compares it to being on call: exhausting even if nobody rings. He moved his online booking cut-off from twelve to twenty-four hours so nobody can slide into home plate without him knowing. Candice's single session clinic runs on a four-hour window, which regular clients have discovered too. Her workaround is simple: if she doesn't want the late slot, she blocks it in the morning. Then comes the guilt of open slots nobody is using, which she suspects is worse than parent guilt (blanket on, blanket off, blanket on again).Humour as a way of stepping back. Ari notices that clients who can find something funny in their situation tend to be in a healthier place, and that he worries more about the ones who can't find any humour at all. Candice connects this to naming anxiety and telling it to be quiet, and to an activity she uses with young children, borrowed from the boggart lesson in Harry Potter: take the thing they fear and make it ridiculous. The burglar they worry about is now wearing pink spandex. In her experience, humour and fear are hard to hold at the same time. Both of them talk about analogy and naming as ways of stepping away from a problem far enough to see it, and Ari mentions two podcasts that do this with their titles alone: The Hilarious World of Depression and You Made It Weird.Where each of us is rooted. Candice spots Ari as a narrative therapist at heart, and he agrees that narrative therapy found him: a musician, storyteller and improviser who always thinks in storylines. He compares it to his music: he plays many styles, but everything runs through punk rock. Candice calls herself intentionally eclectic, choosing a narrative move for distance, a Gestalt empty chair, or somatic work depending on what a client needs in the moment. They land on the idea that most of us have a base way of understanding the world, and the other models we learn fill the gaps it leaves.Therapy, coaching, and the strangest business model. Ari has been asked the difference between a coach and a therapist and tries out an answer about who holds the expertise: if therapy is done well, the client leaves feeling like the expert in their own life. Candice, who also does some coaching work, describes coaching as following a process towards a goal and therapy as helping someone understand themselves, with counselling somewhere in between. Her favourite line: therapy should be a lifeline, not a life sentence. If she is doing her job well, she is putting herself out of business. That brings them ...
    Daha fazlasını göster Daha Az Göster
    47 dk.
  • Brain Zings

    Brain Zings
    28 Aug 2026

    What happens to our boundaries when the instinct to help follows us home? This one starts with the therapist reflex to fix (in friendships, in parenting, in our own relationships) and the honest question of whether the deeper look we do is us being the expert or us happily admitting we don't know. Then the brain starts zinging: the head-tilt theory that runs away with the conversation (lean left for thought, lean right for feeling), whether we could tilt on purpose to shift a session, the way clients walk away remembering a version of what we said that we never actually said, and the birthday Ari went to work only to have one of five booked clients show up. Underneath all of it sits one freeing idea: we are not a crisis service, we are at best a speed bump, and people mostly survive the session we miss. A conversation about holding the work a little more lightly.

    A note on the science: the head-tilt idea we get excited about in this one (lean left to think, lean right to feel, a little extra blood to one side of the brain) is a great story that doesn't hold up. Head position doesn't route blood to one hemisphere, so that part isn't real. There is a smaller, more defensible idea underneath, that a deliberate gesture can cue a shift in your own attention, and we dig into the whole thing in the members' resource inside The Circle.

    Content note: strong language throughout, and a brief, non-graphic mention of suicide and clinical risk in the context of crisis-service limits.

    Like the way we think? The Circle is where we keep the conversation going with clinicians like you. Come find your people: https://tinyurl.com/th3c1rcl3

    Like the way we think? The Circle is where we keep the conversation going with clinicians like you. Come find your people: The Therapist Circle
    Daha fazlasını göster Daha Az Göster
    33 dk.
  • Fascinated with Humans

    Fascinated with Humans
    31 Jul 2026

    Fascinated with Humans

    Two therapists sit down without a plan and follow a good question wherever it goes. What starts as "how close is too close to a client?" turns into an honest conversation about talking about suicide without flinching, why the mandate to keep people safe depends on going deeper rather than backing away, and what happens to the work when we stop trying to be the expert. Along the way: curiosity versus judgment, the difference between fixing and understanding, why nobody grows from being comfortable, and the idea that we, not the office or the toolbox, are the space the work happens in.

    Content note: this episode includes open discussion of suicide and MAID (medical assistance in dying).

    What we get into:

    - How close is too close to a client: transference, countertransference, and the "friend zone"

    - "Who are we to say suicide is wrong?" A colleague's question, MAID, and the gray areas mental health still occupies

    - Why the safety mandate needs the deep conversation, not less of it, and how documentation protects you

    - From understanding to fascination: curiosity and judgment can't share a room

    - Letting go of the expert seat

    - Fixing versus understanding, and the idea that maybe nothing is wrong

    - Nobody grows from being comfortable

    - "We are the space": the real room is the conversation between two people

    - Aging, burnout, and getting the magic back

    Links:

    - Join The Circle (free two-week trial): https://tinyurl.com/th3c1rcl3

    Like the way we think? The Circle is where we keep the conversation going with clinicians like you. Come find your people: https://tinyurl.com/th3c1rcl3

    Like the way we think? The Circle is where we keep the conversation going with clinicians like you. Come find your people: The Therapist Circle
    Daha fazlasını göster Daha Az Göster
    32 dk.
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Henüz yorum yok