Send us Fan Mail

Get vidIQ Boost for an exclusive price! https://vidiq.com/podcast

Want a 1 on 1 coach? https://vidiq.ink/theboost1on1

Join our Discord! https://www.vidiq.com/discord

Watch the video: https://youtu.be/_kUOrWhNynw

“Engaged views” sounds like a simple metric until you actually test it, and that’s where this conversation starts getting useful fast. We share what we’re seeing in real-world experiments, why the number can behave in surprising ways, and how that changes the way you read YouTube analytics when you’re judging hooks, browse performance, and the true impact of impressions.

From there, we pull back the curtain on YouTube MADE in New York and what it’s like when YouTube brings creators into the room, briefs them under NDA, and rolls out a slate of new features. We talk about the contrast between the negativity creators feel online and the consistently optimistic framing you hear from YouTube employees, plus what we learned from interviewing Todd Beaupre about discovery, metrics, and why click-through rate can create “paradoxes” that mislead smart creators.

We also debate the headline-grabber: YouTube A/B testing for videos. We get into who this tool is really for, why it could be powerful for enterprise channels and major creators, and why it may feel like extra work for everyone else. Along the way we touch on subscriber trends, Goodhart’s law, and the uncomfortable truth that the algorithm may be getting so good that viewers don’t need to subscribe to keep watching you.

If you care about YouTube growth strategy, the YouTube algorithm, and the metrics that actually matter in 2026, queue this up, then subscribe, share it with a creator friend, and leave a review. What’s your take: are engaged views and A/B testing going to help creators or just add more noise?