Thank you Neil!!! Carroll is my new favorite.

If you could sum up White Apples in three words, what would they be?

Surreal, hilarious, mind-stretching.

What was one of the most memorable moments of White Apples?

The entire concept of being dead while being alive.

Which character – as performed by Victor Bevine – was your favorite?

Vincent

Was this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting?

Yes, but unfortunately that is impossible for me, but I couldn't wait to get in my car to and from work.

Any additional comments?

If you enjoy Murakami, Gaiman, Mieville, or Scalzi you might as well go ahead and get this one. I listened to Land of Laughs first and enjoyed it so much I immediately went for White Apples. I feared it wouldn't live up to "LOL" but it was just as fun to listen too.

7 people found this helpful

In one word: "Delicious"

I like White Apples for the same reason I like Neil Gaiman's own writing. It's strange and interesting. Like the nightmare that you kind of, almost don't want to wake up from. Victor Bevine was the perfect choice for a narrator. His voice, and the beauty of Jonathan Carroll's language, and the fascinating character driven story... just... delicious.

3 people found this helpful

Phenominal

What made the experience of listening to White Apples the most enjoyable?

Victor Bevine is extraordinary. He lights up the beautiful text with his voice and seamless transitions. They could have a spell it read this book and I'd still cry, the story is that interesting. But the marriage of Carrol and Bevine makes this book less of a story and more of an experience.

If you were to make a film of this book, what would be the tag line be?

I doubt they could do this book justice, but if Tarsem or Fincher gave it a shot it would be something like: How far would you go for love?

Any additional comments?

Listen to this. Don't think, just download.

3 people found this helpful

Thought provoking but too long and drawn out

Would you recommend this book to a friend? Why or why not?

I would recommend but with caution. It was pretty long and drawn out and though artfully written it was like treading through a dream. Some parts seemed disconnected. With that said, however, there were some incredibly thought provoking parts....particularly in the beginning with the ideas that the main character is dead - and how does he really know he is no longer here.

What was the most interesting aspect of this story? The least interesting?

The most interesting was the idea of the strory was the mosiac and the role of chaos with respect to the mosaic. This was amazing and outstanding!! It definitely changes your view of life after death - or rather what comes after the end. Forever changed my view of chaos and the role it plays in life (or afterlife) if one ascribes to it!

Which character – as performed by Victor Bevine – was your favorite?

Favorite character by Victor Bevine was Isabelle - and her amazing, flawless accent.

Could you see White Apples being made into a movie or a TV series? Who should the stars be?

It did remind me some of What Dreams May Come. Scarlett Johansen for Isabelle and Jude Law for Vincent

Any additional comments?

The credit was worth it for the accent, the mosiac and the chaos!

2 people found this helpful

I loved and hated this book

I really had troubles arriving to the end. I really dislike the character of Isabelle, and the fake Austrian accent did not help at all.
the story is great, but sometimes too much romance (cheap romance I must say)!

1 person found this helpful

Why Neil, why?

Would you try another book from Jonathan Carroll and/or Victor Bevine?

No. The beginning of this book is so inane and idiotic in its description of the main character's flirting with women that by the time things started happening beyond the flirting I just couldn't tolerate it. I get this character is a philandering would be lothario but present him in an interesting way at least. The writing felt amateurish and bordered on the edge of Danielle Steele-ishness. If you're into poorly written stories about possibly dead, debatably debonaire douche bags then I guess this one might be for you. But NG, you let us down with this one. You can't win 'em all.

What do you think your next listen will be?

Probably not something from the Gaiman collection.

Who would you have cast as narrator instead of Victor Bevine?

No one. This book should have remained un narrated and lost in the graveyards of used bookstores' bargain bins.

You didn’t love this book... but did it have any redeeming qualities?

None.

Any additional comments?

Don't bother.

3 people found this helpful

A lifeless, poorly thought out book

i rarely leave reviews here, but Carroll's "White Apples" warranted it. The first half of the book set the scene and created an enthralling setting wherein the reader questions what is death, what is real, and what will happen next. Disappointingly, the second half of the book pure exposition, where the author spent several chapter trying to explain a sort of metaphysical overarching plot that was hardly even suggested or foreshadowed at any point. The latter parts of the book were convoluted and a missed opportunity to develop the characters and relationships in a meaningful way. Honestly had to force myself to finish the book because at a certain point, I stopped caring about the often unlikable characters

Unprecedented

Beautiful, touching, funny, and unprecedented in it's creativity. I've never read anything like it. Thank you Neil Gaiman for sharing this.

Interesting at times, but not a strong book

Would you try another book from Jonathan Carroll and/or Victor Bevine?

Possibly. The story was interesting and different, and in different hands it might have worked better. It's not hard to imagine Steven King writing this book, and it would have benefited from King's ability to build believable characters who really sound like regular people.

What was the most interesting aspect of this story? The least interesting?

The 'mosaic' explanation of God is fascinating. The characters were, unfortunately, the least interesting aspects of the book. Carroll told us things about them, rather than showing us. Vincent was a great father. Vincent was a master marketer. Vincent had great penmanship. But there was precious little evidence for any of this. In particular the rather far-fetched claim that he was a great father--in fact, he walked out on his family for his Great Love of another woman, and only interacts with his family in one brief scene (his son does appear, much later, to make the statement, "My father was a great guy." Really? Not as far as I could tell, but if Carroll says so.) He and Isabelle seemed a collection of quirky behaviors and syrupy romantic interludes, not fully formed characters. Carroll doesn't help make these characters any more real by referring to them by their full names again and again, right through the end of the book, perhaps in case you forgot which Bruno he was talking about. One other quirk of writing that made the book less enjoyable for me is Carroll's tendency to start sentences with "ing" verbs. "Lifting his head up, he saw Bruno." "Reaching into her bag, she took out her gum." Once you notice that writing tic, it's hard to stop waiting for the next one, which won't be long in coming, since every third sentence starts this way.

What do you think the narrator could have done better?

The narration was very good. Bevine handled the Austrian accents well and without caricature.

Did White Apples inspire you to do anything?

Unfortunately, it inspired me to be more careful in following Neil Gaiman's recommendations. Viriconium, another recommendation from Gaiman, was hard to get through. I love Gaiman's writing so was hoping for more.

Astoundingly Resonant

I found this book to be philosophically resonant in a manner that I was certainly not expecting from the genre. There is a story, yes, but the elements that really stayed with me when I finished were not plot based but thematic. Life and death and everything in between.